http://www.suntimes.com/news/commentary/letters/552978,CST-EDT-vox12z.articleBush's Iraq strategy echoes the failures in Vietnam War
September 12, 2007
I was 11. I lived in Puerto Rico and was unable to understand why our horrible president wanted to send my brother to a country called Vietnam. All I knew was people were sent there to die.
President Lyndon B. Johnson recalled his top general in Vietnam to defend the war against criticism from Congress. There, William Westmoreland said the military had reached a point where "the end begins to come into view." There would be "light at the end of the tunnel," but "mopping up the enemy" might take two more years. I could not understand there was this thing called a "domino theory," and if Vietnam fell, it would be the "end of our world as we knew it."
It would be five years and 58,000 dead American soldiers later that Richard Nixon proclaimed "peace with honor." As an adult, I know what that means: We lost Vietnam and the world did not end.
Gen. David Petraeus gives the disturbing impression that he, too, is more focused on Washington than the unfolding disaster in Iraq. His description of the war sounds more like a football game. That serves neither U.S. nor Iraqi interests. Bush is counting on the general to restore credibility to his discredited Iraq policy. He frequently refers to the escalation of American forces last January as Petraeus' strategy, as if it were not his own creation. In effect, he is hiding behind his general.
Who is the decider? Who is the commander in chief?
Bush should not be allowed to pass on his responsibility one more time and conceal the facts from the American people.
Carlos T. Mock, M.D., Uptown