Sometimes, for kicks, I get on right wing web sites to see how deluded people are. Lots of wingers are STILL denying that Valerie Plame was covert.
Here's an excerpt from the Wilson v. Libby case:
The Government has
officially acknowledged, in documents filed in the Libby criminal case and at oral argument in
this matter, that Mrs. Wilson was a covert operative for the CIA, see Mot. Hearing Tr. 19:12-15,
and the Supreme Court has explained that "Totten's core concern" -- "preventing the existence of
the plaintiff's relationship with the Government from being revealed" -- is not implicated in "a suit
brought by an acknowledged (though covert) employee of the CIA." Tenet, 544 U.S. at 10. https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2006cv1258-52Seems pretty cut and dried, yes?
However, a winger responded that the charge was never tested in court. He said:
It is only a claim until someone gets charged. Until someone is charged the defense cannot contest it, which is a natural part of the course of a trial. ...Everyone who "leaked" and when they did so is known in this case, and no one is ever going to be charged, in large part because the prosecution feels the case will fall apart based on the testimony of the people who wrote the law in the first place.
This case was never anything but a politically-driven circus, conducted by fiercely partisan forces on both sides, and the spirit of the law in question was never violated.I'm not a lawyer, but is this statement accurate? It seems the government has admitted that Plame-Wilson WAS covert. If that's the case, whether or n ot it was "tested" in court seems moot.