Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

From The Hill: “We can’t have a hearing until we get some of the information we subpoenaed,”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 07:44 PM
Original message
From The Hill: “We can’t have a hearing until we get some of the information we subpoenaed,”
Leahy reiterated his vow not to hold hearing 'til they get the information they need. Great article with lots of quotes and information.

Senate Republicans on Wednesday fired a warning shot at Democrats on the White House’s still-unnamed attorney general pick as Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) declared that front-runner Ted Olson would not be confirmed.

The early sparring over the successor to Alberto Gonzales, who cedes power at the Justice Department on Friday, foreshadows a brutal confirmation battle to come. Minutes after Reid declared former solicitor general Olson was too partisan for the job, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) fired a salvo at Democrats who would delay Gonzales’s replacement.

<snip>

Meanwhile, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy pointed to the panel’s investigation of controversial testimony in which Olson denied knowledge of the Arkansas Project, a conservative effort to uncover possible misdeeds by then-President Clinton and his wife, now-Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.).

“There was a feeling by many that some of the answers he gave in his last confirmation, answers under oath, were not accurate,” Leahy said.

<snip>

But regardless of the nominee, Leahy has vowed not to hold a confirmation hearing until the White House ceases withholding information subpoenaed by Democrats on U.S. attorneys and warrantless surveillance.

“We can’t have a hearing until we get some of the information we subpoenaed,” Leahy reiterated on Wednesday.
Republicans are ready for a fight over those dueling investigations, betting that Democrats will use the attorney general nominee as leverage regardless of who gets the nod.

<snip>



http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/reid-well-defeat-olson-2007-09-13.html


This is gonna be a big fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. "This is gonna be a big fight."
I sure hope so and its about time the Senate Dem,'s grew a pair and stood up to the RePukes with a good dose of their own medicine. They (RePukes) have been obstructing just about every good thing the Dem's have tried to pass so let hell freeze over while they are waiting for a confirmation hearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh, I don't think there's any doubt about that
As The Hill says; it's gonna be brutal. Why? Well, I got a theory about that: Transference. The dems are all frustrated as shit about the war, Petraeus testimony, SCHIP, and other bushit. This is where all that frustration is focused. In addition, should bush really nominate Olsen, that's like waving a red flag in front of a very testy bull.

Tempers are frayed down to the last thread in the Senate on both sides of the aisle. And what's more, this is a fight that the dems- and Leahy in particular, are just itching to have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. this is the future
this is the ONLY way to affect the republican obstructionists, by providing our own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. This is not obstruction.
It's protecting the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. what's to quibble with what I said?
I'm saying we need to obstruct the republican agenda. Call it what you want. I'm determined to block the republicans and their agenda. I don't think the American people would disagree with that effort at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. CUE THE VONAGE THEME!
:woohoo:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC