Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's Intelligence Czar admits he uttered untruths to the US Senate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 10:40 PM
Original message
Bush's Intelligence Czar admits he uttered untruths to the US Senate
Think Progress:

Earlier this week, in testimony before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell claimed the new expansive FISA legislation passed by Congress prior to the August recess — the so-called Protect America Act — had helped to thwart a an alleged terror plot in Germany.

A government official later told the New York Times that McConnell was wrong, and that the intelligence had been collected under the old FISA law which required warrants. A chorus of House Democrats immediately raised concerns about McConnell’s claims.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) demanded McConnell back up his sworn statement. Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ) said the Protect America Act “played no role in uncovering the recent German terrorist plot.” House Intelligence Committee chairman Silvestre Reyes urge McConnell “to issue a public statement immediately” correcting his remarks.

In a statement released today, McConnell unapologetically acknowledged he lied to the Senate:

During the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing on September 10, 2007, I discussed the critical importance to our national security of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), and the recent amendments to FISA made by the Protect America Act. The Protect America Act was urgently needed by our intelligence professionals to close critical gaps in our capabilities and permit them to more readily follow terrorist threats, such as the plot uncovered in Germany. However, information contributing to the recent arrests was not collected under authorities provided by the Protect America Act.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Isikoff has the story here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Right. A mistake.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not "a mendacity"
as Jimmy Swaggart would put it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's cool. I used to talk to Hosenball on the phone in DC in the 80s
when he wrote for Fairchild.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Whoops!
I guess the old law WAS working just fine after all. Well, too bad for all of those Republicans whom will now be at the mercy of the wiretapping authority of President (Democrat). Of course, I'm sure that the GOP will simply demand an immediate repeal of the law as soon as a Democrat becomes President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Also, no more signing statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Unfortunately, the meme has been loosed upon the world.
And will now be repeated as gospel by all the true believers. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hand me my thumbscrews and a bucket of water
We will get to the truth we want ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. hmm don't we call that PERJURY?
just asking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. No longer called Perjury. When Rethugs lie to Congress it is
merely mis-stating. That's alright these days since the Pres., the VP, Sec. of State, Sec. of Defense, the AG mis-state all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. McConnell is an epaulet-wearing loony! Remember how he insisted
that the 4th amendment had no mention of probable cause--even after a reporter quoted him the text? He didn'yt aplogoze then either, just acted like the reporter was a moron!

we are screwn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. I take this back ! --I'm mixing up my Mikes and McConnells
This one is the insufferable pencil-necked geek, not the epaulet wearing loony, Mike Hayden.

apologies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
13. Sometimes I think it would be easier to track the instances
of these bastards telling the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Sad but oh so true.
There might be some rare occurrence.

Here is one: 'It would be easier to run the country if there was a dictator & I was the one.' Something along that line from Busholini.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
15. Marcy Wheeler suspects Joe Lieberman of tipping McConnell off that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Swager
I cant wait until next year, when we get more Dem Senators elected and
slam the door on smokin Joe Lieberwhiner.............:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC