Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why declare permanent military stay in Iraq now? Why today?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kitkat65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:04 PM
Original message
Why declare permanent military stay in Iraq now? Why today?
Why do I feel like we're being set up? Set up the day before a highly-publicized military stand down order. Set up as in "Terrorists Hit (name blue state city here), Cite Permanent Military Presence in Iraq as Justification."

Just two days ago he was talking about some troops being able to come home. I always thought the Liar-in-Chief was merely stalling to take as much of the treasury as he could with one hand while crossing his fingers with the other but this just feels like a great big setup.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't forget Iran, coming soon to theaters near you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. I share your concerns, kitkat, but I have no answers. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Hey there friend
Check out post #4,
Therein lies your answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Y'know, that makes sense. And it's EXACTLY the type of thing they always do.
Wordgames, smoke and mirrors. All spin, all the time.

Thanks- my concerns about tomorrow's full air-defense
standdown are now a separate issue again! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Couple this with a major Iraqi figure being assassinated ...
Reminds me of what happened to Massoud of the Northern Alliance right before 9/11. I felt uneasy before and this announcement today only makes me feel moreso.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's really very simple
A permanent base is needed because you can basically "hide" soldiers there. Classic Bush-bait-and-switch.
For instance, a person stationed in Ft. Hood is not considered deployed to Ft. Hood. They are FROM Ft. Hood.
And in the same vein, a soldier stationed in Baghdad is no longer considered a deployed soldier, they are FROM Baghdad.
Make sense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. WTF
are you serious?

So I suppose this fits into Nancy Pelosi's idea of "redeployment". :grr:

Wow they're really making Idiots out of the American public and right now I feel like a fool. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bush has lost his fucking mind. We better have a strong response, like "HELL NO!" -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Rethugs are so clever. The "Enduring Bases" are named with
Arabic names, so they are Iraqi bases. The only catch is that US Troops are stationed there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. It takes the pressure off Republicans running in ALL races for 08.
Consequently, lots of cover for those supporting the Cheney administrations push to empire.

In the end, Iraq will provide permanent bases in SW Asia in order to advance U$ $trategic intere$t$ during the $econd Cold War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. There's been some recent legislation re: permanent bases.
I've no idea what the status of it is though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC