Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The 'pig fuckers' at the Fox Networks carried Bush's address but did not carry the Democratic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:31 PM
Original message
The 'pig fuckers' at the Fox Networks carried Bush's address but did not carry the Democratic
response! Faux News Channel did.

Slam your local Fox TV networks and advertisers!!!

BTW...I don't use profane language often on this forum, but I'm 'red-faced' pissed!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. No surprise, coming from the Ministry of Propaganda.....
Fox News might as well be an official Bush Administration cabinet position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Now, now, lets be fair
What you didnt see is that Fox News Channel did cover the response. The Fox television network, the one with the real primetime shows such as American Idol and 24 was the one that didnt show the speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Fox Televison Network - the one that uses the 'public' airwaves to broadcast their signals... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. The Fox Television Network, which is probably the most liberal of the networks
When you look at their programming, they probably attract the most liberal viewers out of any network.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Indeed. Sort of like the rabbi that owns the porn shop on the corner... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Soon as a democrat is elected president, I hope we can wipe them off the air
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. How are you going to do that?
censor them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Maybe AUDIT them. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Hell no, just make their lives miserable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Yeah
Like don't let them into white house press briefings etc. Turn about is fair play ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's RNC-TV, that's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BRLIB Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Their FCC License should be revoked!
Immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. whose license should be revoked?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. That's okay. Your description of FUCKS NEWS is an excellent one! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiDuvessa Donating Member (285 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. In fairness...
Didn't some of the Democrat presidential candidates refuse to participate in a debate cosponsered by Fox News?

There is no fairness doctrine anymore. Fox is not required to cover the Democratic response. I think it's stupid of them but they are not required to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC