Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I wonder: Did Hurricane Humberto prove Bill Proenza to be correct about aging weather satellite?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 09:16 PM
Original message
I wonder: Did Hurricane Humberto prove Bill Proenza to be correct about aging weather satellite?
Of course, one of the big news items today was that Hurricane Humberto surprised forecasters with respect to its intensity. Forecasters expected it to hit Texas as a tropical depression, and it ended up being a Cat 1 hurricane.

And immediately, I thought: did the surprise intensity of Hurricane Humberto prove the former Director of the National Hurricane Center to be correct about the aging satellite system?

Bill Proenza was the director of the National Hurricane Center, but he was recently fired after he publicly voiced concern about the aging satellite system, and said that if the antiquated system was not replaced fast enough, hurricane forecasts would suffer.

This was a man who, as director of the National Hurricane Center, was trying to sound the alarm about the dangers that an aging satellite system pose to our ability to forecast hurricanes. His reward? Being fired.



Background info on Mr. Proenza's termination:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20721787/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Perhaps but storms in that part of the gulf are notorious for the 'surprise'...
Alicia in '83 is one that comes to mind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Exactly. Alicia killed more than a few people and surprised everyone.
The water in the western gulf has been getting warmer each year. It was no surprise this morning that he went to cat 1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. No, not at all
For the very simple reason that the satellite in question is still operational. Proenza's argument was that the satellite should be replaced because the data it provided was invaluable for storm tracking. The satellite is at the end of it's projected lifespan, and may fail at any time.

A replacement satellite would not have provided BETTER data, it simply would have continued to supply what the current one does. Furthermore, it's data is not useful for intensity forecasts, better data by far is provided by recon flights.

I would like to see the sat replaced, but I have to admit that from whatever knowledge I have been able to gather from being a longtime tropical storm geek that we really won't miss it much. Once a storm passes 50W in longitude it is close enough for regular recon flights and they provide superior data anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. The surprise was how quickly the intensity developed.
It wasn't the case that they weren't aware of its intensity. They were surprised that it continued to become more intense.

It wasn't a lack of data. Well, probably. It was a fault in the predictive capacity of the models. GIGO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC