|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Andre II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 04:18 AM Original message |
CNN: White Plane over White House the morning of 9/11 was military "doomsday plane" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJKDJKDJK (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 04:23 AM Response to Original message |
1. Just saw it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 04:30 AM Response to Original message |
2. And I thought it was the Jesus - Angel Spirit Jet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 04:57 AM Response to Original message |
3. k&r and thx!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 05:05 AM Response to Original message |
4. The neocons didn't quite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 06:48 AM Response to Original message |
5. ....a little morning fear from CNN... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 06:49 AM Response to Original message |
6. So, apparently, the "leader" of the country would have missed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andre II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 01:57 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 02:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. There are other people on the plane who assume the varioius duties of the government. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andre II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Why wasn't this in the 911 Commission report ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I think the E-4's were originally commercial 747-200's The Air Force and Navy both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:32 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. so the US military own 747's thats news they could be made to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:41 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. The military has always used 747's. Air Force One is the first I think and it was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andre II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:35 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. The mystery is simply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:38 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Bush was away from the White House and that may be the explanation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andre II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:40 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Sorry, please explain to me how this plane is normally used |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:44 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. The planes are used as an aerial command post. They are supposedly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
10. Here is the video |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
14. doomsday plane, NORAD asleep, no jets, no video of jet hitting Pentagon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
16. "And what the plane doing there?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andre II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:39 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Well??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:42 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. 1. Probably the head of NORAD; 2. Don't know; 3. The gov always denies shit like that, even pre-Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andre II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:45 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. And you don't think that question two deserves a better answer than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:54 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. I think the whole thing is worth a real investigation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andre II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 04:26 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. While I agree with the importance of all your points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Um, maybe this simply falls into the realm of military secrets-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 04:44 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Willy Pitt I am with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:39 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. so fly it over DC when there was another plane in the air??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:43 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. I think it was probably pretty safe...like, in the air and stuff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:43 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. one of these days... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andre II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Why do I think that being over the White House minutes after the Pentagon had been hit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #19 |
34. and No fighters to defend it when we are under attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pampango (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-15-07 06:13 AM Response to Reply #34 |
42. I vote for stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
27. So they got this plane in the air that quick.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
32. So they couldn't be bothered to scramble NORAD, but the "doomsday plane" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. exactly and they put up a supposedly defense less plane |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andre II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
36. It was part of wargame "Global Guardian" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andre II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 05:51 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Why then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
38. They had time to crank up the Doomsday Plane, but couldn't scramble fighters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andre II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-14-07 06:06 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Yes, indeed especially if you read post 36 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k-robjoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-15-07 04:12 AM Response to Original message |
40. Kick for post # 36 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-15-07 04:22 AM Response to Original message |
41. Deleted message |
Andre II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-18-07 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
43. Monitoring the sky of the US? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC