Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(CBS) Bob Shiefer: Bush appears to have kept most reluctant Repubs on his side re: Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 10:29 AM
Original message
(CBS) Bob Shiefer: Bush appears to have kept most reluctant Repubs on his side re: Iraq
Edited on Fri Sep-14-07 10:38 AM by sabra

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/bulletin/bulletin_070914.htm

<snip>

Bob Shiefer, who attended a White House lunch Bush held yesterday for political commentators, said on CBS News, "The Republicans who were supporting the President, who were wavering in their support, it appears the President is going to be able to keep all of them on his side. So this policy is going to go through. They have not been able to change it, the Democrats haven't."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Shieffer sounds about as flaky and incoherent as Bush.
What an asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. A permanent occupation, with no end or exit, and Repubs are OK with that?
Edited on Fri Sep-14-07 10:37 AM by wienerdoggie
That surprises me. I figured they would rally 'round the Surge and around the token withdrawal of surge forces, but what Chimpy announced last night was a whole different ballgame--a permanent, decades-long occupation of Iraq. At the very least, we have gone FAR beyond the original IWR--a new resolution needs to be drafted and approved by Congress for this bullshit. I expect a big fight, and I think if the Repugs try to defend a big, permanent occupation (which was NOT what we were sold), they will lose--there is going to be a big battle over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. This is what I've been wondering
I have had little doubt that the GOP would continue their support of the "surge" and oppose any defunding of the war, at least on Bush's watch, but I'm curious to see how they will line up on Bush's new "vision" for an "enduring relationship" with Iraq. An "enduring relationship" (i.e. indefinite long-term military presence of possibly thousands of troops) certainly isn't ANYTHING that Bush et. al suggested might be necessary or part of the deal when he blithely invaded Iraq in 2003 and I wonder if Bush hasn't shot himself (and his party) in the foot by (to his credit) finally being honest about his intentions towards Iraq. I wonder what the Iraqi people think about his proposal of us having an "enduring relationship" with them? I thought that most of them (not their government necessarily) wants us out of there (not that opinions of anybody but Bush et. al matter)? We are in for some interesting times indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. He sure did. Sen. Warner Bush to toss the Repugs a bone and he did --Christmas
present.

all is well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC