Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

While Bush pushes propaganda: "Britain’s Basra Pullback Raises Supply-Line Fears"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 09:05 PM
Original message
While Bush pushes propaganda: "Britain’s Basra Pullback Raises Supply-Line Fears"

Britain’s Basra Pullback Raises Supply-Line Fears

By THOM SHANKER and STEPHEN FARRELL
Published: September 16, 2007

WASHINGTON, Sept. 15 — As British troops pull out of their last base in Basra, some military commanders and civilian government officials in the area are concerned that the transition could leave them and a major supply route to Baghdad at greater risk of attack.

The route, a lifeline that carries fuel, food, ammunition and equipment for the war, crosses desert territory that is home to rival militias and criminal gangs. In interviews, Americans stationed in the southern provinces and Pentagon planners say they are closely watching the situation there as the British pass security responsibility to local Iraqi units.

There is little talk of increasing the American troop presence along the major supply route, which links Baghdad and Kuwait and is called M.S.R. Tampa, although officials in Baghdad and Washington say other options include increased patrols by armed surveillance aircraft, attack helicopters and combat jets.

The significant attention being paid to security in southern Iraq came as the senior allied commander, Gen. David H. Petraeus, announced plans in Washington this week to reduce American troop presence by five combat brigades across the country by next summer.

General Petraeus, in an interview this week, said he was confident that continued allied and Iraqi patrols along the supply routes, and a growing Iraqi security presence in the south, would guarantee protection of the desert roadways.

more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Brilliant move
Isn't there something in Tactics 101 that mentions securing your supply lines. But then, after 4 1/2 years we can't even secure the 8 miles of road between the airport and the Green Zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. if the iraqi`s would have had some fight in them
that mad dash in the desert to baghdad that ended up stalling south of the city could have been a major disaster for our troops. if the iraqi`s would have ied`d paved the roads to baghdad the troops would have been forced to take more routes into the desert.

leaving maybe a bigger problem than going in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. I could have sworn I heard Chuck Hagel say we are paying "tribute"
to keep the supply route open as it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes--he said that. I guess we are bribing our enemies now--pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Self-deleted
Edited on Sat Sep-15-07 09:55 PM by Kagemusha
I misread the original post's topic, sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I don't think that is what he meant. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Isn't Basra Iraq's only port on the Gulf?
Seems to me thats what was reported 4-1/2 years ago. So instead of taking the hand-off of the most critical supply point, the brilliant General Petraeus lets the Brits hand the whole kit and kaboodle over to local troops? Yeah. That'll work. They were damned f**ing lucky they weren't cut off from their supply lines going in. It came within a hair's breadth of that if I recall correctly and even then, the troops were left with virtually no food and less water for weeks if not months after they entered Baghdad. This is even more insane than usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC