Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Found at Stars and Stripes) Gates urges veto of troop-rest measure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 01:12 PM
Original message
(Found at Stars and Stripes) Gates urges veto of troop-rest measure
I can't even imagine being a soldier in Iraq, on my 3rd or 4th deployment, and reading this. :(


Gates urges veto of troop-rest measure

By HOPE YEN
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Sunday he would recommend a veto of a Senate proposal that would give troops more rest between deployments in Iraq, branding it a dangerous "backdoor way" to draw down forces.

Democrats pledged to push ahead with the plan by Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., and expressed confidence they could round up the votes to pass it, although perhaps not by the margin to override a veto.

"The operational tempo that our forces are under is excruciatingly difficult for our soldiers, Marines, all of our personnel and their families," said Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I. "They deserve the same amount of time back home as they stay in the field."

The comments represented the latest political clash over the future course of the war. Last week, President Bush announced plans for a limited drawdown but indicated that combat forces would stay in Iraq well past 2008.

With the Senate expected to resume debate this week on anti-war legislation, Gates sharpened his criticism of Webb's proposal. It would require troops get as much time at their home station as their deployments to the war front.

Gates was asked in broadcast interviews about recommending a veto to Bush should the proposal pass. "Yes I would," the Pentagon chief said.

more...

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_IRAQ?SITE=DCSAS&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. This bunch are determined to make sure that the military
is broken. Particularly, the Army.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. k&r because it needs to get on greatest page and people need to see this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. I saw that
I also saw a bit of his press conference with Pace on Friday I think. He gave plenty of technical arguments as to why this would be such a terrible idea, with emphasis on how it could lead to increased casualties. I cannot judge the validity of his arguments, I just hope Webb and the others can and will have good counterarguments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why not let jr veto it AFTER he completes his tour of duty? AWOL becomes DESERTER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. When President Chuckle nuts vetoes this bill, it will be years
before the majority of people in military uniform votes republican again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I thought of that, but it's still cold comfort for people stuck over there
repeatedly, wondering when their 'luck' will run out. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The cold comfort is knowing they are stuck over there indefinitely,
while Bush plays politics with their lifes over oil!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
simmonsj811 Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. k and r
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC