Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If not Gore, then how about Dodd?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 11:39 AM
Original message
If not Gore, then how about Dodd?
I know he's barely a blip in the polls right now, BUT, he's a smart, savvy guy who seems to be getting it right on Iraq before the front-runners. Where he is on the rest of the issues I have no idea. Any thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
connecticut yankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's my Senator
and I have the highest regard for him, but I don't think he'd be a strong enough candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why not Clinton?
Gore will endorse her, she has similar positions to Dodd without the corporate scandal... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Dodd#Criticism

If Dodd were the front runner and Clinton the underdog, people would be clambering for his overthrow and Clinton's ascendancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. 'Gore will endorse her' - do you think so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpeale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. i think Gore will endorse Edwards or Richardson
big reason: they are friends who think alike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. If Gore doesn't run, he'll endorse whoever wins the nom.
He'd have no reason to express a preference before then. I'm really not sure why Clark popped so prematurely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Yes.
Gore is a long-time politician, the son of a long time senator. He understands the game she has to play, knows what she really stands for (not all good, but not nearly as bad as some make it seem). And he's all about party unity, because he knows that's the only way to win. He knows that all too well, in fact.

I think if Obama or one of the other candidates pulled up to Clinton, things might change. I can't see him endorsing Edwards, unless Edwards just pulled way ahead in the race and it seemed inevitable.

But I have no inside knowledge, beyond what anyone can gain looking at Gore's history. I could be way off. That's just what I think will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I don't hate Hillary.
But a lot of people do. If she gets the nom, she'll be forced to run the dirtiest negative campaign in the modern history of Democratic party politics in order to push her opponent's negatives as high as hers. Frankly, I'm not sure I can stand it. That said, Hillary is a smart, tough opportunist who wouldn't hesitate to personally jam an ice-pick into Rudy Giuliani's eye socket if she thought it would get her elected. These are qualities the next president will require, I'm pretty sure--especially if he/she is a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ludwigb Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. I admire his service
but from the perspective of the Average Amerikkkan he's basically a crusty white dude, who doesn't even grant them the satisfaction of bloodthirsty talk about terrorists. Plus he hasn't been particuarly active in Congress from where I'm sitting--hasn't really impressed me. I thought he pretty much went along with the crowd on the Lieberman issue--only switching his endorsement when Holy Joe won the primary.

Nitpicking, I realize. Dodd is cool I guess--I'm just not enthusiastic about his candidacy. We have too many great alternatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Another New England "Liberal" Senator
oh sure, that's the way to win.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Uh...
So the big advantage Edwards would have is that he's from the South? Wasn't that supposed to be his big selling point in '04--that he'd help Kerry win in North Carolina, at least? How'd that work out, exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Yeah, Edwards Didn't Do Much Good
But that doesn't mean if he'd been at the top of the ticket or VP for another candidate that he wouldn't. One cannot expect the #2 on the ticket to fill the likeability/charisma gap for the person at the top. The #2 on the ticket (and this applies to governor's races) can help with a certain demographic, but will not necessarily carry it on their own if that group has little regard for the actual nominee.

I don't think any running mate would have made the difference in Kerry's campaign. There were just too many other things stacked against him. It was a bad year for Dems all around. At least five Southern Democratic Senators didn't run for re-election in 2004, each one of them was replaced by a Republican. So, I don't know that any candidate would have made a difference.

The comment about "Liberal" New England Senator was more tongue in cheek, although I'm still wary of nominating another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. If the election process was secured, there'd be a liberal in office today.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. And his name would be Al Gore. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Dodd has been sounding very much like a President should lately, but Dennis has already sounded like
a President. I've already made up my mind for the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC