Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fuck Chuck (Schumer)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:18 PM
Original message
Fuck Chuck (Schumer)
So charming Chuck can't wait to stick his face in front of the camera, as ususal, and holds a press conference this morning to praise Mukasey, after Leahy stated again that he needed information that the Committee had subpoenaed, before a hearing could be scheduled. Here's part of what Chuck said:

Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York also repeated an earlier vote of confidence in the judge, calling him "better than any of the names" that have been floated by the White Hosue recently.

"Judge Mukasey is not a crony of the president, he is not a White House insider. That's a good sign," Schumer said, adding that the nominee has a reputation of someone with integrity who puts the law first.

"That is the most important thing right now," he said.

<snip>

http://www.myfoxkc.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=4380590&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=3.11.1

All the dems on the JC should be saying the same thing Leahy is. And publicity hungry Chuck could have had his precious presser to SUPPORT Leahy instead of undermining him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. I like Chuck Schumer
:)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And do you like him
holding a press conference to tell everyone what a good nomination this is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. So, you are saying that Chuck Schumer gave a press conference stating his support for Mukasey?
Did he say this is a "good nomination," and what did he mean by "good?" Does this mean he likes Mukasey and wants him to be AG or is there another reason he used those words, as you say?

Since I did not see it I cannot debate your point, but I would appreciate an accurate portrayal of his statement. Is this link your only reference or did you watch the entire press conference?

KoKo01's thread is vague, but she seems to be indicating it was a good press conference:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1828077

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I just have this link and
and a comment from another DUer who saw the press conference. My point is simple: Whatever he said, he should be backing up Leahy who doesn't want to hold a Hearing until he gets subpoenaed info. And it would be better if he just shutup instead of praising Mukasey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. I don't think Schumer should "shut up."
I am not ready to jump the gun and condemn Schumer just yet. If what you say is true, then I would hardily agree. Mukasey should never be allowed to serve as AG.

Maybe he and Leahy have coordinated their responses to confuse the refucklicans? I cannot say, but I really really like Leahy's idea and hope Schumer is (or gets) on board.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:42 PM
Original message
Well, you could have a point there
that Leahy and Schumer coordinated statements, but it's hard for me to see how.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
20. Schumer says "We want to confirm!" Leahy: "Just as soon as you cough up the papers."
No contradiction. :shrug:

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
21. I am watching it now --->
Check it out (4th link down):

http://www.cspan.org/videoarchives.asp?CatCodePairs=,&ArchiveDays=100

So far Schumer is praising Bushler for his choice, while damning him. :D

Schumer is saying he is a better choice than others so far, but I am not taking this as an endorsement.

Watch it. 4 minutes in he mentions Leahy's request.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Thanks.
I don't have TV, so I can't watch it,and I have dial up, but what did he say about Leahy's request?

I may have to rescind my harsh criticism, but I really wish he wouldn't praise Mukasey or the admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Here's a quote from near the end:
"Our goal is to get an Attorney General in office who puts rule of law first, who will show the necessary independence that every attorney general has had to show at times, particularly in a White House that seems to want to control the Justice Department in an undue way."

Schumer appears to be supporting his Democratic colleagues in this conference, as he deflected questions about them back to criticizing Bushler at every turn.

At the very end Schumer mentioned that he talked to Mukasey? on the phone this morning. The last question asked of Schumer was, "Do you support Mukasey??" He said, "I am open-minded and hopeful that he will satisfy the concerns that I have and other Democrats have, and he will become a consensus nominee."

I can only assume Schumer and Mukasey have an amicable relationship, and that Schumer sees him as a better candidate the previous nominees.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
39. Still waiting for the sound card later.
The freak was one of the to interrogate the first detainees, don't know under what circumstances, but do know he was a first on the bandwagon. He should not be confirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. I agree.... never make deals with fascists.
NO ONE chosen by Bushler should be allowed to serve as AG.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. I'm not a Chuck fan, but...
I think he's right here. He knows Mukasey, and has given a personal endorsement that this is a basicly non-partisan person, the kind a decent Republican would have proposed in the first place. Bush has surrendered here.

I think Chuck can still back Leahy, if he chooses. I don't know if he said he would.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qdemn7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
36. Smuck Schumer
Is a Camera Whore. He is incapable of not shoving his face into the nearest camera.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Be careful
Bush could have sent this guy up so the Republicans would shoot him down and then we get stuck with someone really, really bad! I would have rather had Myers then Alito. Bush knows how to play the game and this guy might be the best we can do.

On Air America today Sam Seder seemed to be OK with Mukasey. Sam Seder is pretty sharp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. That is NOT the point
The point is not whether he's good or bad, the point is to use the confirmation as leverage to get subpoenaed info as Leahy is trying to do, and by going on C-Span and holding a presser, praising this nomination, and not backing Leahy up, he's undermining Leahy's ability to use that leverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Didn't Schumer originally appoint Mukasey to a judicial position?
Seems as if I read that somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yeah, it's a pick designed to have an easy time with Schumer's blessing
I'm wondering if the Democrats got anything for that besides "Not Ted Olson". Or if Schumer gets anything out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYVet Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Chuck did approve of Mukasey
for a lifetime appointment for the William Rehnquist seat on the Supreme Court about 2 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Could Schmuck Schumer
supports Judge Mukasey because of AIPAC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. huh?
You mean like some sort of secret Jewish cabal? Is Mukasey even Jewish? That's just bizarre. Chuck just likes face time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. The Judge is
according to Wikipedia a prominent member of the Manhattan Jewish Community. He donated to LIEberman's campaign and I understand him being an Orthodox Jew he also is a big AIPAC supporter along with Schumer who recommended him to * to be nominated for AG. I am not suggesting that his being Jewish or a friend of Schumer is anything (using your words) "like some sort of secret Jewish cabal". I am just saying that his being an AIPAC supporter might be something that influenced Schumer to recommend him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. I doubt it.
In fact, I think that's a giant leap with no rational basis, and, well, an odd thing to think. Do you realized Glenn Greenwald also had some positive things to say about him? Do you know who Greenwald is?

I think Chuck probably thinks he's a better pick, because he is better than Olsen or Thompson. He slapped down the admin on the Padilla case, and he's not some pro-life fundy crony of bushco's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Doubt whatever you want
but AIPAC has a lot of influence on our Government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Sure it has influence, but dragging it into this
says more about you, than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. You don't
think that wondering who influences the decisions our elected make is a legitimate thought?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Sure, but hardly in a situation like this.
You're suggesting that A) Schumer is more loyal to AIPAC than to the Constitution, or B) that AIPAC is so all powerful that they could influence Schumer to support Mukasey when he doesn't actually believe that he's what Schumer said he is.

Do you understant why I think that's just a tad odd?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. I think your wrongly
jumping to a conclusion that I was suggesting anything. No I don't think it odd, I think you just incorrect in your conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. What a completely scummy remark.
Goodness, I wonder where it could be coming from?

No chance in hell that Mukasey is an honest judge? Nah, he's a Jew, how could that be?

The amount of slime at DU just boggles my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Who said
anything about the honesty of Mukasey besides YOU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. I like Chuck Schumer too and . . .
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 04:35 PM by TomClash
Mike Mukasey may deliver the subpoenaed documents anyway. And if the WH stops him, he may very well resign. He's a lot closer to Eliot Richardson than Alberto Gonzales.

I get what Schumer is doing - Mukasey is from his state and he wants to support him.

But your point is well-taken - why not force him to make that concession - and a few others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. Leahy can always appeal to the Judiciary Committee chairman to sit in the nomination.....
Oh, wait, Leahy IS the chairman of the Judiciary Committee. His opinion is the only one that really matters and I expect he'll do exactly as he pleases. I'm really glad Senator Schumer likes Mr Mukasey but I doubt that will have much influence on Chairman Leahy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. That's not the way it works in the real world
his opinion is not the only one that counts on the Committee. If he doesn't have support for holding up the nom, it'll be hard for him to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
42. Obviously we differ in how we view practical politics in Washington....
Even in a senate split 50-49, Pat Leahy can sit on any bill or any nominee for as long as he chooses. Regardless, I doubt Leahy will hold up the AG nomination for long-but not because of Chuck Schumer's opinion. He'll bargain a bit with the administration but will hold hearings and a vote soon because he wants whats best for the Justice Department and Mukasey is as good as we're going to get for the next 15 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
15. You simply want to whine about the dems.
That's easy to see. Instead of standing with them when they do stand up, you bitch. Pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. LOL
Except I don't bitch about ALL the dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Really. Which ones are pure enough for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. What are you talking about?
If you're asking what dems I admire, here's a few. And it has NOTHING to do with purity:

Waxman, Conyers, Lee, Woolsey, Welch and dozens of others in the House.
Leahy, Sanders, Boxer, Kennedy, Dodd, Whitehouse, and several more in the Senate.

None of them are perfect, but they'e all legislators that I believe do a credible job.

Is that good enough for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. WTF!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Watch it:
Check it out (4th link down):

http://www.cspan.org/videoarchives.asp?CatCodePairs=,&ArchiveDays=100

After 4 minutes he mentions Leahy's request.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Have to wait until I get home. No sound card here.
Thanks Swamper! :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. no problemo
See post #29 for more details. :hug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
23. Typical Schumer
New York can do a whole lot better than that....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
43. sometimes I think Schumer is a lot like Arlen Specter--
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 10:55 PM by bbgrunt
makes a lot of good noise sometimes, but is always the first to capitulate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
budibudinski Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
44. How much wood could a woodchuck schmuck if a
woodchuck could schmuck Chuck ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
45. They are from the same state and if I am not mistaken
this isn't the first time that Schumer has voted to confirm this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
46. Big fan of Senator Schumer here.
Chuck Schumer can lead the charge to retake the U.S. Senate for Democrats any time.

cuz I'm thinkin', well, heck. Schumer's pushing to get Webb and Whitehouse and Brown into the Senate, and I'm like, you know, enamored of those people, cuz like, well, they're Democrats too, and well, you know, I kinda like Democrats awful good.

So I turn on the tv set and there's ol' Chuck Schumer battling for the folks I like.

Son of a gun.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
47. some good pals and me, we worked some of Schumer's campaign to unseat
Al D'amato.

If you knew D'Amato like we knew D'Amato you'd revise your notions of the good senior Senator from New York, cali.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
48. I don't like the pick, but for a Bush pick it's extraordinary
Given how horrid theother AGs were.
It's probably the best we'll get out of the guy. maybe that's his reasoning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC