Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

INTERIOR ATTORNEY PLACED ON PROTECTED WITNESS LIST

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 06:37 PM
Original message
INTERIOR ATTORNEY PLACED ON PROTECTED WITNESS LIST
This trust fund is one of the biggest screw ups ever. And now to compound the felony I guess they feel the need to shoot the dude who drug that dirty laundry out into the open to try and start giving a wash.
--##--

original-peer

For Immediate Release: September 17, 2007
Contact: Carol Goldberg (202) 265-7337

INTERIOR ATTORNEY PLACED ON PROTECTED WITNESS LIST

Secrets Case on Assets Mismanagement Elevated to Presidential Appointee

Washington, DC — An Interior Department attorney who revealed extensive mismanagement of Indian properties has been named as a witness against his own agency in a multi-billion dollar lawsuit, according to filings released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). At the same time, the decision whether to fire that attorney for disclosing government misdeeds has been elevated to the Interior Solicitor, a presidential appointee.

Robert McCarthy, a Field Solicitor based in Palm Springs, is charged with violating the Trade Secrets Act, an obscure criminal statute, for revealing major ongoing mismanagement to a newspaper reporter. Now McCarthy has been named as a witness against the government in a decade-long lawsuit brought by tribal members to force an accounting of Indian trust funds collected by the federal government. This legal battle in which plaintiffs claim $28 billion is owed is called Cobell v. Kempthorne after its lead plaintiff and the current Interior Secretary.

As a result of being named a witness, McCarthy becomes subject to a special court order enjoining any “retaliatory action or making threats of such action against any person who has been identified as a Potential Witness in this case.” Paradoxically, Interior is proposing to fire McCarthy for the very same disclosures that have made him into a protected Cobell witness.

The decision about whether to act on the proposed firing of McCarthy was originally assigned to Deputy Solicitor Larry Jensen but Jensen recused himself because he is in charge of defending against the Cobell case. Jensen referred the matter to the Solicitor David Bernhardt, who was confirmed by the Senate in September 2006 to head the 300-lawyer office. The matter has sat on Bernhardt’s desk for the past two weeks without any decision.

“No one doubts that Robert McCarthy is telling the truth about the extent of losses to members of Indian tribes due to government incompetence, neglect and malfeasance,” stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch, whose organization is representing McCarthy along with the Government Accountability Project. “In this quintessentially Washington drama, the only issue is whether a government lawyer will be allowed to speak the truth.”

The main concern that McCarthy has repeatedly raised to the Inspector General, Congress and the media is that millions of dollars a month in lost revenues to tribal members are continuing to this day. In turn, the government and taxpayers are liable to repay those losses, according to the Cobell litigants.

“Interior’s inability to even track revenues owed to Native-American property-holders is only compounded by the attempt to cover-up that failure,” Ruch added. “The Interior Department and its Solicitor’s Office are daily becoming more entangled in the webs of their own deceptions.”

The Cobell case is slated to begin hearings before the federal district court in Washington, D.C. on October 10th although extensive pre-hearing motions are expected.

###





complete release including links to related sources here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. whoa.
this should make for some interesting reading come October. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Cobell case
is big!
Billions of dollars owed and they have won in every court this has been brought.
The Documentary Channel has run a film about this - hope they show it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. This scandal goes back DECADES
through Presidents of BOTH parties. A real, proper, full investigation is going to take years and will show dirt on both sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The American way: Stealing from paul to peter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is a monumental screwup that has grown beyond any hope of an accurate accounting...
Judges have issued contempt citations and lies have been told by people in charge, and yet those attempting to set the record straight are facing an impossible task of determining exactly how much money is missing, how much interest should have compounded, and how large the trust fund should be today.

Anyone who is honest will admit that the Government has no idea how much money should be repaid to the mismanaged Trust Fund, but that it is huge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC