Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Orthodox Jew Tapped To Replace Gonzalez

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 08:56 PM
Original message
Orthodox Jew Tapped To Replace Gonzalez
President Bush nominated an Orthodox Jew to be U.S. attorney general.

Michael Mukasey, a retired federal judge from New York, is a conservative who has criticized Bush administration policies that have kept detainees from consulting with lawyers.

Democrats have praised Mukasey, and his selection represents a shift from Bush's combative defense of the most recent attorney general, Alberto Gonzales, who resigned last month.

Mukasey's Jewishness became an issue when a defendant in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing filed a motion to remove the judge, arguing that his allegiances to fellow Jews and Israel would create a bias against Muslim defendants. The motion was dismissed as "utterly irrelevant."

---EOE---

http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/104180.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have a feeling this thread will be "dismissed as utterly irrelevant."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. hear about O.J. Spears?
caught breastfeeding in Olive Garden!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. LOL!
I wouldn't know. I stopped watching TV last week except for Animal Planet and Comedy Central.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I would have a hard time dealing without Comedy Central.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. And the Food Network...and BBCAmerica.
That's about all we watch except for Keith Olbermann.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daninthemoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. LOL. you seem to have the pulse of DU lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Really. That would be unfortunate, unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daninthemoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
34. The thing about oj spears breast feeding, not the original thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Forgive me, Swamp Rat...
But are you implying that Jews are jackbooted thugs? Since that is the topic of this thread?

Should we not have Jews in the DOJ? Or only the right kind of Jew? What would the right kind of Jew be, in your opinion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. YES!!! JEWS ARE JACKBOOTED THUGS!!!
Just kidding. :D Though, I'm not sure how you construed that from my saying this thread will be dismissed as utterly irrelevant.

Hmm, the right kind of Jew for AG? That would be ME! :D ... except I'm not an attorney. Nevertheless, I think I would do a lot better job than Bushler's pendejo:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaldemocrat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
42. Swamp rat, would you like our store to sell your art on various items and split the profits
on everything we sell that comes from your art?

Or if you sell your own items now, tell people where to buy it.

Your material looks excellent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is he an orthodox Jew or a conservative Jew?
Do you know the difference? Why does it matter so terribly to you?

What, exactly, are you a purveyor of?

That question was rhetorical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
40. Sounds like you know the answer.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
60. Must be of the conservative bent...........
The forced bowing out of Gonzo was obvious a ploy to gain breathing room and return options. This Michael Mukasey being an orthodox line would obviously put the kibosh on anymore Saturday night massacres wouldn't ya thing :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Your point being?
Yeah, let's removed all the Jews, and Muslims, and others who live by their faith from positions of authority. They cannot be trusted.



:sarcasm:

I am curious: would you post something like that had the person in question been a Muslim or a Christian?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. Certainly you shouldn't think I'd pass up an opportunity to post the same type thread
had the nominee been an 'evanglical armegeddonite'.

After all, I did not find this article on the david duke website, I read it on the JTA. They seem 'quite pleased' and so should you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. You are ignorant.
I'm not even Jewish, and I know that being an Orthodox Jew does not automatically translate into being an 'evangelical amegeddonite', anymore than being a Southern Baptist translates into being "an evangelical armegeddonite'. Think Jimmy Carter, for example, he's a Southern Baptist.

You might consider educating yourself. Ignorance is at the root of much bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Perhaps I wasn't clear in my post. I didn't equate an orthodox jew with evangelical amegeddonites
at all.

What I'm telling you is, I would have posted the story regardless.

It defined the religion of this nominee as presented for all to read from a Jewish website.

I can just imagine your unconcerning interest about the intent of the post versus the content of the article had the nominee been of Muslim faith...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. Actually, I hammer people who come down on
Muslims, everytime I see it. So shove that someplace...else. I don't like religion or culture bashing. And you're disingenuous to put it kindly. You absolutely did compare an Orthodox Jew to evangelical armegeddontites. It's right there for anyone to see.

Just delightful to see you try and deny what you wrote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Do you think being an Orthodox Jew means yearning...
...for Armeggedon? It doesn't.

It means keeping kosher, and three prayer services per day, and not turning on lights or driving from Friday night to Saturday night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. The OP doesn't seem interested
in any facts that conflict with his biases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. "They seem 'quite pleased' and so should you!" omg what? next thing you know
we might even be accepted as part of society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's OK, he'll only order illegal wiretaps through a hole in a sheet.
Yeah, sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:13 PM
Original message
That sex through a hole thing is a fallacy n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. Maybe, but it makes a really funny Upright Citizens Brigade episode. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. as a jew i'm getting quite a kick out of this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. LOL!
See #18 :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. So?
Just out of curiosity, why did you feel it was important to post this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. For the same reason I would have posted it if the christian broadcasting network
had announced a "Evangelical Baptist Tapped To Replace Gonzalez"...

Of course, I would have placed that in BN and would have probably received 44 recs by now...

/chuckle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Please read the post in which
an orthodox Jew is not necessarily a right wing wacko, anymore than all Southern Baptists are right wing wackos.

You should be ashamed of flouting your ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daninthemoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. Just hearing the name I assumed he was Italian. Thought it
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 09:45 PM by daninthemoon
sounded like Don Lucchese. Then when I saw pix of him with Giulani, I figured he was a capo.

on edit:

Is this posting AS offensive as the original thread, LESS offensive, or MORE offensive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. So fucking what.
Jehova H.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. This is as good a pick as there is going to be, it would appear. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. Don't feel inclined to answer
any questions about your need to post this, huh?

Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
23. Wait....
if they let Jews in the Justice Department, next they'll wanna be on the Supreme Court!

Thanks for alerting us to this menace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. Of course, Ruth Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer
have been holding the tide against the "Scalias and Thomases" but now we know that as Jews they should not have been nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. But, but, but......
are they :scared: ORTHODOX :scared: JEWS????!!!!!!:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #37
46. LOL!
We better find out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #31
54. It's all the fault of that troublemaker Brandeis ....
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudbase Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #23
51. And then, before you know it,
Hollywood will be crawling with them.

As an orthodox Jew, he should have a very good grasp of right and wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. Maybe he's an AIPAC stealth candidate
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 09:36 PM by cali
and hey, Chuck Schumer sent his name to bushco as an acceptable candidate. Someone on a thread about this appt., pointed that out. Maybe it's all part of an AIPAC scheme to get their man in.

That makes about as much sense as your explanation that he's akin to a fundy whacko.

Ooh, an Glen Greenwald had some good things to say about him; isn't he Jewish too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
32. I don't understand why everybody's getting on the OP's case
If the new AG is an Orthodox member of any religion, it means it's an important facet of his life. Since he's now a public figure, that's something we should at least be aware of. The article in the OP is from a Jewish source and isn't judgmental in any way.

And, for the record, I'm Jewish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. He proceeds to compare Orthodox Jews to "'evanglical armegeddonite(s)"
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 09:43 PM by Eric J in MN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whoneedstickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #35
48. He did nothing of the sort...
..he said "HAD" the nominee been....

So his point was "had the nominee presented any type of distinct religious viewpoint that might be relevant to understanding his ideology", a post would have been relevant.


There seems substantial evidence to indicate he's a Neocon of some sort (supported the patriot act, gave money to Lieberman, but not a social conservative). He may not be a direct intellectual descendant of Allan Bloom and Leo Straus (like Wolfowitz) but there is a distinct strand of conservative thought that closely ties Jewish theological orientations and public policy positions. A similar theology-ideology linkage pattern, but with a different style, is evidenced in evangelical Christians.

Somehow pointing this pattern out means one is bordering on anti-semetism. Which is complete knee-jerk nonsens because it is equally easy to make the point that Jews have been an integral (if not leading) part of American liberalism for Generations. From William Brennan to Noam Chomsky we owe them all a debt of gratitude. However, I find the Neocon position insidious, unpalatable and frankly a bit un-American in its rejection of much of liberalism and modernity (at its Straussian heart)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. That's drawing a comparison. Duh. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whoneedstickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. No, he drew a parallel. He did not compare one with the other.
You are as dense as he claims. He did not say, "just as I would if the candidate were a Satanist (or whatever) " he said "HAD the nominee been a Satanist". There is a distinct rhetorical difference that appears above your linguistic capacity to recognize. YOU made the inference. He did not make the implication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. LOL
How many angels are dancing on that pin of yours? How thin is that hair you're so laboriously trying to split? Talk about dense. Too funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. Because the headline
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 09:45 PM by MonkeyFunk
as written indicates that his religion is the most important thing about him.

Not "New Yorker appointed AG". Not "Retired Judge appointed AG."

I think it's very disingenuous to pretend not to see the problem.

It's like the old joke:

Two old men are sitting on a bench. One of the me sighs loudly.

"what's the matter, Ollie?" asks the one man.

"Well, for 30 years I built the best boats in this town. Do you think they call me Ollie the Boatmaker? NOOO!!! I raised 5 kids and have 12 grandchildren and 9 great-grandchildren. Do they call me Ollie the Patriarch? Noooo.... But you suck ONE cock..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. This comment, for one thing:
Certainly you shouldn't think I'd pass up an opportunity to post the same type thread
had the nominee been an 'evanglical armegeddonite'.

As you're Jewish, you certainly know that just because someone is an Orthodox Jew, that doesn't make him/her a fundy nutjob.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. To continue to misrepresent my equating an orthodox jew with a evanglical armegeddonite demostrates
your faulty spin of the subject at hand but it is well demonstrated, that is 'what you do'.

Carry on ole poor one. I explained my motive for posting the article, title intact from a Jewish news source.

Make what you can from it and enjoy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Yeah, like I'm the only one here on this thread who's challenged
you on it. Pitiful. Just pitiful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
36. Will he be willing
to maintain his independence from the Bush administration and follow up on the criminal investigations of the Bush administration?

I don't care about his religious preferences as long as he is committed to doing his job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
41. EEEEKKK!!!!!!!! Waiter, there's a JOOOOOOOOO in my government!!!!!!!!!!!
:scared::scared::scared::scared::scared::scared::beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
47. That's interesting but irrelevant
Kind of like "E" entertainment news on DU with a possible side of trouble-making.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
52. The ENTIRE OP is taken straight from the JTA story.
So if anyone here has issues with orthodox Jews, it the writer at JTA, not the poster of the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. so what?
Why did the OP feel this was important to post and how do you justify this remark by the OP?

Certainly you shouldn't think I'd pass up an opportunity to post the same type thread
had the nominee been an 'evanglical armegeddonite'.

After all, I did not find this article on the david duke website, I read it on the JTA. They seem 'quite pleased' and so should you!

The OP can claim he wasn't comparing Orthodox Jews to fundy nutjobs (and yes, evangelical armegeddonists are fundies) till the cows come home, but this is clearly a comparison. It would be like stating that such and such a nominee is a Southern Baptist and thus someone not to be trusted. Of course Jimmy Carter is a southern baptist.

And why would someone point out the man's religion? What's the point.

It doesn't matter that JTA wrote the piece he quoted. The JTA piece was written with a sense of pride that someone from their community had been nominated. Do you think that's the reason the OP posted it?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Keep on 'grasping'...that is pretty much all you have left. Thank you to the posters that actually
understand the reason for the article post and its context.

I remain...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. Grasping?
I hate to break this to you, but many, if not the majority of the posters on this thread, found your "reason" for posting, dubious... to say the least. Most on this thread made fun of you. But keep dissembling. You seem determined to dig that hole as deep as you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
53. A Jew! Run!
Well, I doubt he'll get confirmed from the 30% that bush has left in his favor.

He is a smoke-screen for the real nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nealmhughes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
58. Defendents argue everything they can when in a bind.
Whether the judge is Jewish or not is immaterial -- he was the one that fought DOJ for them to have attorneys!

So, what's the worst? No late court on Friday night? But he can work on Sundays!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
61. Whats your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. You go first. What's yours? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. LOL!
YOU posted the OP, and the poster you're responding to asked you, as the OP, what the point of your posting was, and you respond with "you go first"? You probably can't even recognize the irony in that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC