Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Officials Promise Surveillance Privacy Safeguards Unchanged = McConnell and Wainstein

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:41 AM
Original message
Officials Promise Surveillance Privacy Safeguards Unchanged = McConnell and Wainstein
Officials Promise Surveillance Privacy Safeguards Unchanged
By Spencer Ackerman - September 18, 2007
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004224.php

In response to questions from lawmakers about possible surveillance of Americans, McConnell and Wainstein both stated flatly that the Protect America Act doesn't remove robust "minimization" procedures for handling information collected on U.S. persons in the course of a foreign intelligence information. For instance, names of U.S. persons -- citizens and non-citizens -- collected in the course of a foreign-foreign warrantless surveillance investigation have to be blacked out and removed from reports based on that collected intelligence.

Under questioning from Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN), however, Wainstein conceded that there are certain situations under which intelligence analysts might disseminate information on U.S. individuals throughout the government -- if it's necessary for the official reviewing the information "to understand the foreign intelligence value" of the intercept, for instance.

Wainstein suggested that's something of a trivial and minor circumstance, but who knows? Cohen referenced a 2006 Newsweek story that said the NSA has improperly turned over 10,000 names of U.S. persons acquired through surveillance to other agencies. .......

VIDEO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. There are exceptions, meaning they break the kaw?
My informant on illegal surveillance said the route all the US communications overseas where US law does not apply. I'm sure they did not even address that issue, and the question should be reframed in that context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC