MoveOn Ad Flap Likely to Be Replicated — On Both Sides — Through 2008

[babylonsister]

MoveOn Ad Flap Likely to Be Replicated — On Both Sides — Through 2008
By CQ Staff | 12:35 PM; Sep. 19, 2007

By Emily Cadei, CQ Staff

First it was the fodder for an eruption of Republican outrage. Now the full-page ad that MoveOn.org ran in the New York Times on Sept. 10 slamming Army Gen. David Petraeus, the top commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, is the target of a campaign finance complaint with the Federal Election Committee (FEC).

In the complaint filed last Friday, the American Conservative Union (ACU), a conservative political action organization, has alleged that the New York Times had in effect made a contribution to MoveOn.org Political Action, the political action committee (PAC) of the liberal group, by charging a below-market rate for the ad. Under federal election law, PACs are prohibited from accepting individual donations in excess of $5,000 in a given calendar year. The law also bans corporations from making any kind of contribution to political campaigns or committees.

ACU Chairman David A. Keene, in documents filed with the FEC, cited media reports on the rate of a full-page black-and-white ad in the Times that ranged between $167,000 and $181,000. MoveOn.org has stated that it paid $65,000 for its Petraeus ad, which ran on the first of two days of congressional testimony in which the general strongly defended President Bush’s troop “surge” policy in Iraq. The difference, according to Keene, “constitutes a corporate soft money contribution to a federal political committee” — something that, if deemed true, would be a violation of federal election law that could subject the participants to fines.

CQPolitics.com asked ACU spokesman Bill Lauderback if the complaint had anything to do with the content of the MoveOn ad, which portrayed Petraeus as “General Betray Us” and accused him of providing political cover to the president in his controversial prosecution of the Iraq war. Lauderback replied, “MoveOn.org has a constitutional right to say anything it wishes. It does not have the liberty, however, of violating federal law as it relates to the receipt of corporate contributions.”

But the New York Times dismisses the notion that the ad amounted to any sort of political contribution. While Catherine J. Mathis, the newspaper’s vice president of corporate communications, said the Times does not publicly disclose the amount any one advertiser pays, she stated that MoveOn’s fee “is the rate that we would charge normally for that type of ad under those conditions. It would be available to other similar advertisers.”

more...

http://www.cqpolitics.com/2007/09/moveon_ad_flap_likely_to_be_re.html

[Raster]

1. Please, oh pretty please, let's go tit for tat. Nine times out of ten, the NYT opinion page alone

is an illegal contribution to the Rethuglican Party. Please, let's do talk partisan bias and election law. That's a good one. Electoral law and the ACU. Why stop at the NYT? Let's look at Faux!

[Raster]

2. self-delete

[monmouth]

3. I sent MoveOn a donation for the first time....I luv them..hehehehe