Dem. Rep. Jerrold denier Nadler is scared

[donsu]

he was on Wash. Journal this morning and a caller had spoken about 9/11 being an inside job.

In a state of fright Jerrold quickly stated that it was absolutely, positively, not an inside job (my wording)

and the conversation went on to something else.

disappointing.

[karlrschneider]

1. What was -his- wording?

...

[donsu]

4. he said what I said but in House of Rep. Speak

c-span will have it on radio and video

[Kelly Rupert]

2. Apparently saying "nope" makes you scared.

Let me tell you, when I'm at McDonald's and the girl asks me if I want to upgrade to a large, I'm in a state of absolute terror before I tell her that I absolutely, positively, do not.

I hope nobody ever uncovers my dark secret.

[Kingshakabobo]

40. We KNOW you killed The Hamburglar - CONFESS!!!!

[Kelly Rupert]

61. I did it all for the Slurpee. n/t

[coco77]

3. I saw it they all run away from it..

and so do the hosts. I have been sick and tired of that damn host Greta for weeks now, finally callers have been calling her on her shit. I am beginning to think that Washington Journal is the Greta show. She hangs up on the good callers who have a good points and makes sure that it is usually Dems.

She reads papers and takes up all of the time, and once a repug calls in with some bullshit she jumps to the papers again and then goes right back to a repug. When a caller told her about it she said Dems weren't calling in with her lying ass.
Whew! that felt good I have been screaming at the tv for months now. Where are the rest of the damn hosts they have her on almost everyday...

[donsu]

5. yes, said the samething to myself this a.m. - Greta again?!

maybe the other hosts are finishing up vacations

[Catherine Vincent]

7. So far, she's been okay to me.

I think she's trying to prove herself as being serious since she is the youngest of the bunch.

[coco77]

10. She must be trying to prove it to the CONS..

When the guy ron took over he was never on this much. When I hear her voice I begin to walk out of the room because she will be reading papers for five or ten minutes, then take a call and start reading again... Peter lets the callers go at it...

[immoderate]

16. Rob? They brought him along slowly because...

He had trouble reading on the air. They even had him on with co-hosts to read for him. He's OK now, but I always thought he was OK.

Also, Rob started about the same time as Pedro.

We all remember things hosts do that we don't like. Things we like are credited to the guest or the caller. The hosts never do anything we like. That's a good thing. (What do you think the freepers say?) I'd wager though, that if non-partisanship can be found, no one is more committed than C-SPAN.

Edit to add:

Greta seems OK, but new.

--IMM

[coco77]

21. I think his name is Rob..

the black guy. Whatever,this Greta woman is on too damn much.

[AndyTiedye]

25. The Repiglickin' Media Is Just Getting Warmed Up For Election Season

It is going to get a lot worse by November 2008.

[OPERATIONMINDCRIME]

6. Well, Like, It Wasn't An Inside Job. So He's Pretty Much, Like, Spot On And Stuff.

You're angry at him why?

[donsu]

11. what makes you think it wasn't an inside job?

nt

[OPERATIONMINDCRIME]

13. Common Sense, Healthy Reasoning Skills, And Mental Sanity. n/t

[donsu]

15. lol, sorry

nt

[BuyingThyme]

18. No reasonable person can conclude that the Bush administration

blocked all 9/11 investigations because they weren't involved in the crime.

No reasonable person can conclude that people like Condoleezza Rice lied about things like the 8/6 memo because they weren't involved.

No reasonable person can hear a witness explain the reasoning and timing behind the decision to implode Building 7 and then deny it was ever imploded.

No reasonable person can believe that the Bush administration was not involved in allowing, if not orchestrating, the attacks of 9/11.

No way.

[ProfessorGAC]

43. Why?

Why wouldn't people lie to cover their gross incompetence?
The Professor

[hang a left]

49. Your right teacher...

It is a massive cover-up for a bunch of people running THE country that don't know what the fuck they are doing.

Why didn't I come to you in the first place?

I feel so much better now.

[hang a left]

8. Remember what happened to the last congressman/woman

that dared utter a word regarding CT.

Well then, now you know why.

Nadler was excellent yesterday.

[hang a left]

9. Here is what Jerry said:

“We must not forget the lessons of history. Both the Fourth Amendment and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act were responses to abuses by government officials who thought they were above the law. We all agree that we want to protect our national security and that foreign intelligence gathering is fundamentally different from domestic surveillance. However, we should also agree that the power to invade people’s privacy must not be exercised unchecked. As we consider how to fix the Protect America Act, we must restore the fundamental freedoms that have been lost because of our recklessness. We must focus surveillance on terrorist activity and provide meaningful court review to protect the rights of Americans who will be spied on in our country. We must not trust this or any other administration to police itself. We must act now to restore much-needed checks and balances into this damaged law. We must restore respect for our Constitution that this Administration clearly does not care about.”

[NYCGirl]

12. Doesn't sound like my fine congressperson is scared at all. NT

[donsu]

14. you are changing the subject

yes, what you wrote is what he said about that subject. not what he said about 9/11.

why do you want to change the subject?

[hang a left]

17. Well you must have missed my first post...

So let me just ask you personally.

Do you remember what happened to Cynthia McKinney??

Do you think that Nadler has the same death wish??

I am not changing the subject at all but it is really not fair for you to call Nadler out when ANY representative from the government (congress, judiciary, executive et al) would have had the same response.

The public is not ready for this. Especially at this most fragile of times.

[donsu]

19. what makes you think the public isn't ready to hear the truth of 9/11?

what fragile times? the public knowing the truth about 9/11 will upset what fragility?

[hang a left]

28. Well here at our liberal and open minded Democratic Underground....

those conversations are relegated to the dungeon.

Just like Mc Kinney's career as a congresswoman.

Next question DONSU.

BTW. I never see you in the 9-11 forum. Since you are so devoted to the topic you oughta drop by some time.

[2rth2pwr]

20. Is Cynthia McKinney dead?

that's news to me.

[donsu]

22. no, she is still fighting the good fight

nt

[hang a left]

27. No she is not dead, but she no longer represents Georgia

on the account of accusing the current executive of having foreknowledge of the events of 9-11. After her congressional loss is 2002, she traveled the country giving lectures and talks regarding 9-11. She was a willing martyr.

snip>>
Other factors in her defeat were her controversial statements regarding Bush's involvement in 9/11,<8><9> and her opposition to aid to Israel and a perceived support of Palestinian and Arab causes and alleged anti-Semitism by her supporters. On the night before the primary election, McKinney's father stated on Atlanta television that "Jews have bought everybody ... J-E-W-S" in the election, presumably referring to AIPAC involvement in orchestrating the "erase Cynthia" campaign.<8>

snip>>>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynthia_McKinney

[onenote]

30. I thought she no longer represents her district because she lost an election.

Oh, it was the Jews that did it. I see.

:sarcasm:

(although the sarcasm smilie isn't really the right one -- we need a get a grip smilie)

[hang a left]

34. Hey onenote you are fucking brilliant.

This is what happens when representative discuss the undiscussable ya tard:

I mean isn't this what this thread is about. Or did you forget??


"We know there were numerous warnings of the events to
come on September 11," McKinney said that day. "What did this administration know and when did it know it, about the events of September 11? Who else knew, and why did they not warn the innocent people of New York who were needlessly murdered? What do they have to hide?" McKinney thought she knew the answer. "What is undeniable," she explained, "is that corporations close to the administration have directly benefited from the increased defense spending arising from the aftermath of September 11th."

It was all downhill from there. On April 12, 2002, a synopsis of the interview appeared in the Washington Post. Democrats began distancing themselves from McKinney. She released a statement admitting she was "not aware of any evidence" proving "President Bush or members of his administration have personally profited from the attacks of 9/11," but "a complete investigation might reveal that to be the case." Then again, it might not. For that matter, McKinney might have had no idea what she was talking about.

Appearing in print just months after the September 11 attacks, McKinney's charges couldn't be excused. Nor could her list of campaign donors, which included both terrorist sympathizers like Abdurahman Alamoudi, the former executive director of the American Muslim Council, and apparent actual terrorists like former college professor Sami Al-Arian. Nor could her October 12, 2001, letter to Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal, in which she rebuked New York mayor Rudy Giuliani for returning the prince's post-9/11 "gift" of $10 million and urged bin Talal to donate the funds to "charities outside the mayor's control," especially those that dealt with "poor blacks who sleep on the street in the shadows of our nation's Capitol." Giuliani had returned the Saudi's money because it came with the implicit condition that America "address some of the issues that led to such a criminal <9/11> attack," among them "its policies in the Middle East," where "our Palestinian brethren continue to be slaughtered at the hands of Israelis while the world turns the other cheek." To Giuliani, such a statement made excuses for terrorism. This wasn't a problem for McKinney.


CONTINUED
1 2 Next >
Print This Article

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/079tehyf.asp









snip>>>

[onenote]

44. I just didn't realize that her district had so many Jews in it.

I thought it was a mostly African-American district that nominated and elected another African-American to represent them largely because she had become an embarassment.

By the way, the "Jews" comment was made after her defeat in 2002. She was elected again in 2004 when her successor vacated the seat to run (unsuccessfully) for the Senate.

I guess the Jews were busy doing something else in 2004.

[hang a left]

46. Actually it was 2002

You don't remember the Osama ads. The same ads that nixed Max Cleland.

[hang a left]

47. Anyone ready for some more straw...

man????

[2rth2pwr]

45. Yes, her constituents tossed her out on

her ear. That happens when they find out your a loon.

[hang a left]

48. Oh I get it....

You came to a thread that was a complaint about a congressman who didn't speak up regarding 9-11...

only to call McKinney a loon for doing so.

Got anything else to do today???

Just hoping.

[2rth2pwr]

50. and you wonder why you don't get any responses

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1847398

[Name removed]

51. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[2rth2pwr]

52. Watch out, I've got a Taser. nt

[hang a left]

54. Oh I see...

So you refuse to return to the subject at hand.

Hmmmm.

I was right in my assessment. Exactly what I thought.

[2rth2pwr]

55. The subject at hand is Nadler and the accusation that

he has knowledge of 911 complicity by "insiders" but that he is too scared to admit it.

McKinney spoke out about this and her constituents preferred someone else in the next election.

you may begin.

[Name removed]

56. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[hang a left]

58. Let. Me. Make. It. Real. Simple. For. You.

Original OP:

Dem. Rep. Jerrold denier Nadler is scared

he was on Wash. Journal this morning and a caller had spoken about 9/11 being an inside job.

In a state of fright Jerrold quickly stated that it was absolutely, positively, not an inside job (my wording)

and the conversation went on to something else.

disappointing.

snip>>>>>




Now back to what we were talking about....

[2rth2pwr]

59. Oh, there you are. Nadler always looks a bit unsettled

but why do you think that if he were to expose the conspiracy he wouldn't be treated like a hero?

[Name removed]

60. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[2rth2pwr]

62. Hey! Where did you go? nt

[hang a left]

65. You are kind of funny ya know.

I took a nap. You were boring me ;-)

[2rth2pwr]

66. funny looking. nt

[donsu]

67. Oy! you are messing about with wordage

I never said Nadler had knowledge of 911 complicity by "insiders"

you made that up.

[2rth2pwr]

68. Ok , what is your implication?

You said:
"he was on Wash. Journal this morning and a caller had spoken about 9/11 being an inside job.
In a state of fright Jerrold quickly stated that it was absolutely, positively, not an inside job (my wording)
and the conversation went on to something else."

What is he frightened of?

[Cessna Invesco Palin]

33. her "thread" was sent to the "dungeon"

so she could be amongst only other sooper jeenyuses?

[hang a left]

35. What are you talking about...genius???

[2rth2pwr]

23. "a conversation" thanks to tinrobot

BUSH: So, what's the plan again?

CHENEY: Well, we need to invade Iraq and Afghanistan. So what we've decided to do is crash a whole bunch of remote-controlled planes into Wall Street and the Pentagon, say they're real hijacked commercial planes, and blame it on the towelheads; then we'll just blow up the buildings ourselves to make sure they actually fall down.

RUMSFELD: Right! And we'll make sure that some of the hijackers are agents of Saddam Hussein! That way we'll have no problem getting the public to buy the invasion.

CHENEY: No, Dick, we won't.

RUMSFELD: We won't?

CHENEY: No, that's too obvious. We'll make the hijackers Al Qaeda and then just imply a connection to Iraq.

RUMSFELD: But if we're just making up the whole thing, why not just put Saddam's fingerprints on the attack?

CHENEY: (sighing) It just has to be this way, Dick. Ups the ante, as it were. This way, we're not insulated if things go wrong in Iraq. Gives us incentive to get the invasion right the first time around.

BUSH: I'm a total idiot who can barely read, so I'll buy that. But I've got a question. Why do we need to crash planes into the Towers at all? Since everyone knows terrorists already tried to blow up that building complex from the ground up once, why don't we just blow it up like we plan to anyway, and blame the bombs on the terrorists?

RUMSFELD: Mr. President, you don't understand. It's much better to sneak into the buildings ourselves in the days before the attacks, plant the bombs and then make it look like it was exploding planes that brought the buildings down. That way, we involve more people in the plot, stand a much greater chance of being exposed and needlessly complicate everything!

CHENEY: Of course, just toppling the Twin Towers will never be enough. No one would give us the war mandate we need if we just blow up the Towers. Clearly, we also need to shoot a missile at a small corner of the Pentagon to create a mightily underpublicized additional symbol of international terrorism -- and then, obviously, we need to fake a plane crash in the middle of farking nowhere in rural Pennsylvania.

RUMSFELD: Yeah, it goes without saying that the level of public outrage will not be sufficient without that crash in the middle of farking nowhere.

CHENEY: And the Pentagon crash -- we'll have to do it in broad daylight and say it was a plane, even though it'll really be a cruise missile.

BUSH: Wait, why do we have to use a missile?

CHENEY: Because it's much easier to shoot a missile and say it was a plane. It's not easy to steer a real passenger plane into the Pentagon. Planes are hard to come by.

BUSH: But aren't we using two planes for the Twin Towers?

CHENEY: Mr. President, you're missing the point. With the Pentagon, we use a missile, and say it was a plane.

BUSH: Right, but I'm saying, why don't we just use a plane and say it was a plane? We'll be doing that with the Twin Towers, right?

CHENEY: Right, but in this case, we use a missile. (Throws hands up in frustration) Don, can you help me out here?

RUMSFELD: Mr. President, in Washington, we use a missile because it's sneakier that way. Using an actual plane would be too obvious, even though we'll be doing just that in New York.

BUSH: Oh, OK.

RUMSFELD: The other good thing about saying that it was a passenger jet is that that way, we have to invent a few hundred fictional victims and account for a nonexistent missing crew and plane. It's always better when you leave more cover story to invent, more legwork to do and more possible holes to investigate. Doubt, legwork and possible exposure -- you can't pull off any good conspiracy without them.

CHENEY: Hey, why don't we put Ted Olson's wife on that fictional Pentagon plane to make it look even more real. He won't mind hiding his wife for the rest of her natural life.

BUSH : Can I stand on the wreckage with a megaphone?

[karlrschneider]

26. Nicely done! But it will zoom way over a lot of heads around here...

:eyes:

[bdamomma]

29. sounds about right.

[snooper2]

32. That was the funny as shit....

RUMSFELD: Yeah, it goes without saying that the level of public outrage will not be sufficient without that crash in the middle of farking nowhere.

:roflmao:

[Cessna Invesco Palin]

37. i started writing something similar ages ago.

the main difference being that lieberman was the mastermind, and cheney's pacemaker was an electroshock device implanted my mossad, to be triggered by lieberman when cheney "got out of line."

[hang a left]

41. I have received so many PMs about you being an asshole...

I always defended you.

Not. one. day. longer.

[Cessna Invesco Palin]

53. i've never asked for anyone to defend me.

and i'm sorry that i appear to have let you down for whatever reason. I don't appear to be saying anything in this thread i haven't said 100 times before.

[Kelly Rupert]

38. That was absolutely wonderful. n/t

[LSK]

24. how the hell would Nadler know if its an inside job???

And why ask the question if he thinks its MIHOP? Why not ask if he believes the Official Story and ask him for further investigations???

But no, go straight to tinfoil.

[Bucky]

63. A flawlessly executed plan involving numerous moving parts and no press leaks?

How can you doubt that 9/11 has all the hallmarks of a Bush Administration scheme?

[Cessna Invesco Palin]

31. not insane = scared?

eh?

[hang a left]

36. Damn!!

Your intelligence and insight is JUST baffling.

[Cessna Invesco Palin]

39. i never claimed to be smart.

i only claim to not be a fucking retard.

[hang a left]

42. I wouldn't be sure...I mean...if I was you and all...

[Cha]

57. And he knows this for a fact ..

because?

[Bucky]

64. I just want to go on record saying "Jerrold denier Nadler" is the most lame-assed nickname ever

Please tell me you can do better than that. Like Jerrold "Go" Nadler.