Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BIDEN Issues Statement After Senate Fails to Restore Habeas Corpus Rights of Detainees

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 11:56 AM
Original message
BIDEN Issues Statement After Senate Fails to Restore Habeas Corpus Rights of Detainees
http://biden.senate.gov/newsroom/details.cfm?id=283631&

September 19, 2007
Press Release

BIDEN Issues Statement After Senate Fails to Restore Habeas Corpus Rights of Detainees

Washington, DC – Former Chairman and senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, U.S. Senator Joseph R. Biden, Jr. (D-DE), voted in favor of an amendment (#2022) to the Defense Authorization Bill to restore habeas corpus rights to those detained by the United States. The writ of habeas corpus, a judicial safeguard which finds it roots in the Magna Carta, grants those being held the right to contest their imprisonment in a court of law. Habeas corpus ensures that if the United States detains an individual, it does so with full respect for the Constitution and the rule of law. The Senate failed to adopt the amendment.

“Habeas corpus was conceived to prevent someone from being locked up illegally, with no chance to contest his/her imprisonment. It is not a get out of jail free card. And it will not result in the release of dangerous terrorists,” said Senator Biden. “As I’ve said before, the terrorists win when we abandon our civil liberties. The way we win is to show them that we can fight this war without changing our character as a nation. I hope the Senate reconsiders this issue once again”

In 2006, Congress severely curtailed habeas review for detainees when it passed the Military Commission Act. Senator Biden fought against the provisions in the Military Commission Act that deprived detainees of habeas corpus and has been a strong proponent of measures to restore habeas corpus to detainees, especially in the years since 9/11.

Today’s amendment would have made clear that all detained terrorism suspects held by the United States could invoke habeas corpus to challenge their classification as an unlawful enemy combatant and their conviction by a military commission of a war crime.

“The position urged by the Administration, that we must choose between Constitutional rights and fighting terrorism effectively, is simply wrong. Our strength as a nation, and our status as a world leader, is based in part on the fact that Americans do not choose between national security and liberty; we demand both,” said Sen. Biden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. "terrorists win when we abandon our civil liberties" I agree .
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 12:04 PM by Mountainman
Ever since 9/11 we have been giving up our freedoms in hopes of gaining security. We are no more secure than we were on 9/10 yet we are less free. The terrorists have surely won by turning us on ourselves.

We say the troops are fighting to protect our freedoms in Iraq while we throw them away at home. Is that supporting the troops or are we letting them die in vain? What hypocrites we have become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redneck Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Every Dem voted to end the filibuster
An amazing show of unity for a change.

"Still, the American Civil Liberties Union -- which has been highly critical of Democratic leaders on such issues -- praised this morning's vote. Every Democrat voted to break the filibuster, along with Republicans Specter, Hagel, Richard G. Lugar (Ind.), Gordon Smith (Ore.), Olympia J. Snowe (Maine) and John E. Sununu (N.H.). The only senator absent for the vote was Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.)."

More at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/19/AR2007091900873.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Next time I will have to call all the republicons and see if it makes
a difference. The ones I called voted for it. Makes me ill that any senator could stop a bill that would protect the very people they are supposed to be serving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redneck Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. My guy (subooboo) voted for it
He's running scarred. He's up for re-election and he's been trying to distance himself from the bushies for a while now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I have to agree
For once, the "redstate" Dem Senators did the right thing.

It is an anomaly I wish to see continued.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thank you Senator Biden! Sen Clinton should also make a statment please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks. K & R. I missed this and posted a dupe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC