Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No Genocide against Native Americans in past!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
azndndude Donating Member (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 12:57 PM
Original message
No Genocide against Native Americans in past!
According to this idiot, The US government had no PLANNED policy of extermination against the Native people of this land.
http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/MichaelMedved/2007/09/19/reject_the_lie_of_white_genocide_against_native_americans?page=full
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. The white supremist privileged males think they can erase the truth
they think they can buy history.

They'll certainly try.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff30997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. What an ignorant fool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wonder what the Sand Creek Massacre was
Edited on Thu Sep-20-07 01:01 PM by Selatius
An example of a government and government troops accidentally wiping out a bunch of people?

http://home.epix.net/~landis/sandcreek.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Removal policy alone proves Medved's a liar.
BQ is another government invention aimed at slowly eradicating the indigenous people of the US. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bassic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. In other news,
Edited on Thu Sep-20-07 01:10 PM by Bassic
Adolf Hitler was a great guy to have a beer with. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. I wonder what he'd call intentionally passing out blankets last used by...
Edited on Thu Sep-20-07 01:17 PM by warren pease
...smallpox victims to individuals of various tribes, including Cherokees, under the guise of keeping them warm in winter? Just another fucking accident?

There were an estimated 12 to 15 million people living in North America around the time Columbus "discovered" Hispaniola and, to the detriment of millions, decided to take a right and sail north. By the time "the west was won," most of the original inhabitants had been slaughtered by "guns, germs and steel," as Jared Diamond's brilliant analysis of westward expansion by the same name makes clear.

If that's not a planned, well-executed program of ethnic cleansing, then my name isn't Manifest Destiny.

Oh wait... it's not. Well, you get the idea.


wp


edited for clarity (sort of)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Sheridan was notorious for his supposed declaration that "the only good Indians I ever saw were
Edited on Thu Sep-20-07 01:26 PM by shain from kane
dead" -- an attribution he steadfastly denied."

Ronald Reagan played Custer in "The Santa Fe Trail". Another actor played Sheridan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. They decided to sell Indian lands in Ohio when their first bank went bust.
The threw off King George, whose law would not allow invading Ohio.

There are more Revolutionary War officers buried in Marietta, Ohio, than anywhere else
(there near the first building, a fort with gun slots), because the officers got all
the best land grants in the new Northwest Territory. No Indian title was recognized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. Correct context?
The notion that unique viciousness to Native Americans represents our "original sin" fails to put European contact with these struggling Stone Age societies in any context whatever, and only serves the purposes of those who want to foster inappropriate guilt, uncertainty and shame in young Americans.


Contorted reasoning and revisioning.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDenton Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. if you look at it from a technology standpoint
There is just no way you could have European contact and have the Native American cultures survive intact. Cultures like the Cherokee started changing soon after after European contact. Even the Plains Indians cultures were highly artificial/evolved, being created by horses introduced from the Spanish. Horses in North America had been extinct for thousands of years until the Spanish brought them to the plains. Yet the plains Indians had a mythology about horses, even though they had only had them for a few hundred years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is such a disgusting article in so many ways. I don't even
know where to begin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDenton Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't think the US had a policy of genocide
Edited on Thu Sep-20-07 02:34 PM by PDenton
in a systematic manner throughout its history, though some campaigns that were carried out bordered on genocide, especially against plains Indians. Mostly the campaigns against Indians were based on forcing them to leave lands that white settlers were entering and comming into conflict with the native Indians. They were also moved onto reservations and often encouraged, directly or indirectly by the government, to adopt different ways such as farming vs. nomadic life. That is hardly a history to be proud of but it isn't genocide. "Ethnic cleansing" might be a better description.

The article is essentially correct, however I'd take issue with the last few paragraphs, as I believe it is important to remember that many of the lands in the US were not given up willingly or easily, and at least according to modern sensibilities, were taken with a great deal of brutality, rather unjustly. Accidental exposure to infectious disease destroyed most Native American cultures and individuals. You need to be very careful when you use a word like "genocide", because it has a specific meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Wow


Um, a cursory review says you are probably wrong.

Not only did the whites repeatedly break treaties and settle on Indain hunting grounds, when the feds rounded them up and put them on 'agency' property they failed to provide these former hunters with enough food to survive. Whites who felt they were more entitled let them starve. LET THEM STARVE.

They killed off all the buffalo and settled natives in places like Pine Ridge - oh yeah you red people can grow all sorts of crops IN DUST!

The slavery of entire tribes prior to the Revolution, the Trail of Tears, the many massacres of women and children, the relentless pursuit of those who only wanted to keep some acreage for hunting purposes. If that wasn't genocide, I don't know what the hell is.

And we don't have the excuse that 'their ways couldn't mesh with white ways." The Cherokee were living as white people in the South, farming, owning slaves (as bad as that is and it is evil), attending church, publishing their own newspaper, but when gold was discovered in Georgia, GREED said that native people had to go far, far away. And walk there in the dead of a brutal winter.

That's what they got for assimilating....death and misery. And genocide.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yeah.. those smallpox blankets were a "coincidence"
That's a disgusting rewrite...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. i can not remember reading in my books about the indians
dieing of disease in the upper midwest that was brought in by the french...dam now i`m going to have to look this up tonight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC