Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry amendments to change Iraq policy: report in 90 days, withdraw in nine months, no stalling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 09:47 AM
Original message
Kerry amendments to change Iraq policy: report in 90 days, withdraw in nine months, no stalling
Edited on Fri Sep-21-07 09:48 AM by ProSense
SA 2966. Mr. KERRY submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 1585, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2008 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:


At the end of subtitle C of title XV, add the following:

SEC. 1535. POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES ON A VOTE BY THE PARLIAMENT OF IRAQ ON THE UNITED STATES MILITARY MISSION IN IRAQ.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:

(1) Section 1314(d) of the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-28; 121 Stat. 125) states that ``he President of the United States, in respecting the sovereign rights of the nation of Iraq, shall direct the orderly redeployment of elements of U.S. forces from Iraq, if the components of the Iraqi government, acting in strict accordance with their respective powers given by the Iraqi Constitution, reach a consensus as recited in a resolution, directing a redeployment of U.S. forces''.

(2) President George W. Bush stated on April 24, 2007, that if the Government of Iraq ``said get out now, we're tired of the coalition presence, U.S.'s presence is counterproductive, we would leave''.

(3) In May 2007, a majority of the members of the Parliament of Iraq reportedly signed draft legislation calling for a timetable for the withdrawal of United States forces from Iraq.

(b) Policy of the United States.--It shall be the policy of the United States to request that the Prime Minister of Iraq submit to the Parliament of Iraq a resolution stating that it is in the interests of the people of Iraq to transition the United States military mission in Iraq to (1) training, equipping, and providing logistic support to the Iraqi Security Forces, (2) engaging in targeted counterterrorism operations against al Qaeda, al Qaeda-affiliated groups, and other international terrorist organizations, and (3) protecting United States and Coalition personnel and infrastructure, and redeploy United States forces not necessary to complete such missions by not later than nine months after the date of the enactment of this Act.



SA 2967. Mr. KERRY submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 1585, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2008 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:


At the end of subtitle C of title XV, add the following:

SEC. 1535. CONDITIONING OF UNITED STATES SUPPORT FOR GOVERNMENT OF IRAQ ON MEETING KEY POLITICAL BENCHMARKS.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:

(1) On November 27, 2006, Prime Minister of Iraq Nuri al-Maliki stated that ``he crisis is political, and the ones who can stop the cycle of aggravation and bloodletting of innocents are the politicians''.

(2) On January 7, 2007, President George W. Bush stated in a speech to the Nation that the purpose of sending more troops to Iraq was to provide ``breathing space'' to the Iraqis to achieve national reconciliation, and that ``America will hold the Iraqi government to the benchmarks it has announced''.

(3) On September 4, 2007, the Government Accountability Office reported that the Government of Iraq had met only one of the eight legislative benchmarks necessary for political reconciliation.


(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the United States strategy in Iraq should be conditioned on the Government of Iraq meeting key political benchmarks, as told to members of Congress by the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and reflected in the commitments of the Government of Iraq to the United States and to the international community, including--

(1) forming a Constitutional Review Committee and then completing the constitutional review;

(2) enacting and implementing legislation on de-Ba'aathification;

(3) enacting and implementing legislation to ensure the equitable distribution of hydrocarbon resources of the people of Iraq without regard to the sect or ethnicity of recipients, and enacting and implementing legislation to ensure that the energy resources of Iraq benefit Sunni Arabs, Shia Arabs, Kurds, and other Iraqi citizens in an equitable manner; and

(4) enacting and implementing legislation establishing an Independent High Electoral Commission, provincial elections law, provincial council authorities, and a date for provincial elections.

(c) Comptroller General Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress an independent report setting forth--

(1) the status of the achievement by the Government of Iraq of each of the benchmarks described in subsection (a)(3); and

(2) the Comptroller General's assessment of whether or not each benchmark has been met.

(d) Withdrawal of Political Support.--If in the report under subsection (c) the Comptroller General determines that the Government of Iraq has not met each of the benchmarks described in subsection (a)(3), the United States shall immediately withdraw political support for the Government of Iraq under Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki and support efforts by the Iraqi Parliament to form a new government.


Vote on that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. These bills should at
least be brought to the floor for debate. They did Kerry-Feingold, introduce these into the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed
And they should just keep proposing other similar ones, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not only will they not pass, but today we lost two Dems on ending the war. It's hopeless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Introduce them anyway! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It is not hopeless
It is never hopeless. It is hard yes. But remember what you are fighting for and why. It's not about me or you, it's about doing something for our country. That need never dies, never goes away, never gets less and never stops.

This fight was never going to be easy. There are powerful forces arrayed against us. They have shown that they are willing to do or say anything to get their way. They have no scruples, morals or conscience when it comes to their agenda. Always keep in mind that this is what you are up against and that the people you are fighting want you to give up and lose hope.

We fight because we have to. Most people I know in politics would rather be involved in getting solutions to problems, not fighting a frustrating battle over keeping things from getting worse. Maybe at a later date we can get to those solutions. Right now, we fight because, without us, there is no one else to do it. If we give up, they absolutely win. I could not live with that and could not leave that to my kids.

Hope is what sustains you. It is what gets you through the bad times and keeps the ideal of a better way in front of you. We cannot live without hope. If you are in short supply of this needed item, put out a request for some. There are people here on DU who will lend you theirs. I guarantee that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thank you for that kind post. I am just feeling dispirited after this
Edited on Fri Sep-21-07 01:43 PM by wienerdoggie
week's body-blows--first the defeat of the Webb amendment, then habeas corpus, then the Cornyn amendment passes (MoveOn), and now the Levin Reed amendment fails, and we actually LOST Democrats to the pro-war side. You are right, gotta have hope, or you have nothing. I'll try to buck up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. hmmm..... what else IS there to do - go along and march with the fascists?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Thanks for that inspiring post, Tay Tay. Sometimes a good old
fashioned pep talk and being told what the broader goal is is important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. We lost them because the amendment was too weak. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. He could get elected in '08 on that alone.
Reelected, I mean. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC