Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will we have to endure another Bush 30 years from now?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
american_typeculture Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 02:28 PM
Original message
Will we have to endure another Bush 30 years from now?
I've seen a lot of Nixon apologists recently when people compare Nixon to Bush. How bad is the next one going to be? Are people going to be looking at each other in 30 years and saying, "Damn! Supreme Emperor Xerxon Kang makes George W. Bush look like a flower child!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sooner if the constitution isn't restored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Failure to impeach Bush will lead to another one
Future leaders know that they will be able to get away with anything without fear of punishment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes, I believe it's because of the previous miscreants in both
the Nixon and Reagan administrations were who able to slink away, go about the business of making money until they saw the opportunity to grab power again, that we are in the fix we are in now. If they had been prosecuted, tried, sentenced and thrown in jail like they should have been, it would have been a lesson future wannabe political criminals not to try it. Look where it gets you. Instead they have gotten the opposite message, you can get away with breaking every law in the book, including murder, and come out richer and more powerful than before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not even that long
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Exactly. 2012 if not sooner -- if things go the way they've been going.
:shrug: Sadly, we may be looking back at Smirk with nostalgia, much like we're looking back at Nixon.

My bumpersticker: "I Miss Nixon"

Dick wasn't anything close to as criminal and corrupt as Cheney/Bush. Not even close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. George P Bush (JEB's son) is what? 31 now?
2012 is very real...

and there's always Jeb..

and Neil's son Pierce wants to go into politics...

And as long as the thugs are never truly held accountable...they will keep coming back

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
american_typeculture Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. That is who I'm thinking.
No time like the present to start digging up dirt on the guy. Now is the time to do it too because he doesn't think he is under the publics scrutiny. He's probably right. Catch him now, while he's out coke-whoring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes. Highly probable. Because he's set all kinds of uncontested,
unchallenged, and unquestioned precedents for this. And I GUARANTEE there will be another who comes along in a few years - maybe sooner than 30 years - who'll point to this era as he (or she) builds another tyrannical dictatorship and say "WELL???????? What the hell are you complaining about? I'm not doing anything beyond what george w. bush did, and you sure didn't have a problem with him. If his actions were so unconstitutional and illegal, why didn't you stop him? You didn't do SQUAT to stop him, so it must not have been that big a deal, 'EH??????"

GUARANTEED. The precedent has been set. If there are NO consequences meted out to him for everything he's done, then that means there WILL BE NO consequences, EVER, for this.

I think you can take this to the frickin' BANK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. ITA
that's why he needs to be impeached, if only to document his crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Another Bush? Definitely, and probably less that 20 years
They are barely trying to hide anything anymore, I cannot imagine them allowing that long before installing one of their monstrous own back on the Throne.

After all, their the ones who made the big connections, whacked Kennedy (90% certainty in retrospect), kept those hostages in Iraq, subverted the Paris Peace Talks in '68 and the Israeli/Palestinian Peace talks in 2000, and all the rest of it.

It's THEIRS! THEY PAID FOR IT and did the dirty work, the wetwork, the treasonous work required to steal a great Republic and make it your slave.

"Supreme Emperor Xerxon Kang", and you can just about bet your house, car and kids that he will be here by 2100 almost certainly, 2050 likely, and maybe even by 2030 or so, after that next Caligulan Bush (George P., I'd bet) sits on the throne. Hell, Supreme Emperor Xerxon Kang might BE George P. Bush, for all we know, although I would say probably not, is coming.

Once the Republic dies fully and firmly, and gleichschaltung ("bringing into line") has advanced to the point where today's Democratic Congressional Leaders willbe compared as lions of rectitude and strength compared to the todies of Kang.

Uccch! Let's hope none of that comes to pass, although some variant is 80% likely, over the next century. Glad I won't be around to see 2100.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Absolutely, unless...
...we gut the shadow government and excise it from our body politic, and unless we utterly destroy the neocon movement and its current manifestation, the modern GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. The pendelum swings..
only so far...in the best of times. I'm not sure this country will survive this administration, let alone future ones. The ties that bind are firmly entrenched in every federal agency. And, those not in power sit on the boards of major multi-national corporations, most assuredly in the defense industry. How can the problem be fixed when attention is paid to the symptoms and not the problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. That Constitutional amendment that no one not named Bush can hold the office...
... is probably on that drawing table as we speak. And there are so many choices: Jeb, Neil, the twins, Jeb's addicted daughter... And by then the grandchildren will be of age, so we'll have a whole new generation to choose from. Clearly, the divine right of kings is making a huge comeback.

Personally, I think it's about time we had a line of succession based on genealogy in this country. Why base control of the country on the whims of the electorate? Various cutting-edge voting technologies have begun to address that problem, but an amendment would be so much more official sounding.

Of course, as with any family of inbreds, the Bushes will eventually produce a dysfunctional idiot unfit to perform even the most basic human functions -- critical thinking, coherent speech or reading comprehension -- much less the capacity to pretend to run a country. But that's what senior advisers are for, which is why the Cheney cloning project is so critical to the continued survival of America 2.0

On the downside, there will be an unprecedented volume of petitions for legal name changes clogging the courts, but that's a small price to pay given the rewards of an endless Bushean Dynasty.

The 28th Amendment: officially known as The Keep America Happy and Free from the Terrorists Act. Please sign the petition when it comes to a Walmart near you.


wp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yes. They are grooming Pierce Bush as we speak.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mentalsolstice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. I predict Jeb will win the GE in 2008 with write-in votes
...or so they'll try to convince the sleeping masses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. And when they compare signatures...
...they'll find they were all done by the same signature machine.

http://www.signaturemachine.com/

I like the ghostwriter myself, not just because I am one, but because it looks small enough to conceal and take it into the voting booth with you.


wp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. Possibilities: Noell (Jeb's daughter) is about the right age
Noell Bush mug shot:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mentalsolstice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Well, her uncle overcame his problems. Oh, wait... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. An uninformed or disinformed citizenry = You're Republic is going to die.
There can be no real representation unless the people are informed. As of yet, they are suffering from lack of information. The result is people elect people like Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC