Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If they want to force a woman to have an ultrasound before an abortion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:13 PM
Original message
If they want to force a woman to have an ultrasound before an abortion
Then they ought to force potential military recruits watch soldiers get blown to bits so that THEY too can make an informed consent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. I missed something. Who's 'they' and what would be the point? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smokey nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sam "Frozen embryos talk to me" Brownback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'm sorry sister
Brownback has legislation that would force women to watch an ultrasound of a fetus before an abortion so that she can see the life she is "killing".
If "killing" is the issue--then we need informed consent EVERYWHERE people are going to be "killed"...starting with soldiers on the battlefield.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. That's pathetic. Furthermore, who'd pay for that ultrasound? Most
people get abortions because of financial and insurance (or lack of) problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Careful, Sam. Forced ultrasounds and forced childbirth smell like socialized medicine.
A perfect example of how conservatives have no problem holding conflicting views, as discussed in an interesting thread, earlier today: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1868902

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. but it's okay because it's being forced upon women

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Sounds like a "big-gubbmint program" to me, Sam..
These repube wackos are sure mighty interested in the 'girlie-bits' aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colinmom71 Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. Actually, a lot of clinics now perform ultrasounds...
on all pregnancies scheduled to be terminated. This is done to confirm the gestational age of the fetus and to make sure the proper abortion technique is being used in order to reduce the possibility of complications for the pregnant woman.

From what I understand, there's no separate charge for the ultrasound for this purpose, and the clinic does not involve the patient in the ultrasound unless the patient asks to see it herself. Frankly, the idea of making the woman look at the ultrasound is just ludicrous. What are they going to do? Pin her eyes open to keep her from averting her gaze? But then I guess we women are just so stupid that we can't possibly know that pregnancy results in a baby unless we're forced to see an ultrasound! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Pick the fundie group or state
Edited on Fri Sep-21-07 04:19 PM by depakid
The anti-choice crowd has been proposing this around the country:

See, e.g. Abortion ultrasound-viewing advances in S.C.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17741934/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
57. Minimally these fundie groups should PAY FOR THIS BS!
And liability for any lawsuits, etc. too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. What is this about????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Senator Brownback has introduced a bill that would require women seeking an
abortion to view ultasounds of the 'baby' before proceeding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. includes laundry pins to keep your eyes open?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. That SOB. Then I want him to be made to see what all his sperm might grow up to be before he
masterbates or has sex with his wife if she is no longer having babies. He is slime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. ahah! I was thinking that
Edited on Fri Sep-21-07 04:22 PM by Whisp
but you said it better.

or he should be forced to look at his own brain scan and do the find the peanut game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. have no idea what this is about, but I agree with you! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. The fundies are gearing up to handle this new ultrasound requiremen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I think it's a good idea.
I don't think abortions should be illegal but I do think women should be counseled more. My daughter-in-law had an abortion 12 yrs ago (long before she met my son). She would love to have a baby but can't get preg., she doesn't like family get togethers because everyone else has a baby. It has left her emotionily scarred. So if an ultrasound would save a few babies, good.
I also think a women can make 1 or even 2 mistakes but after the 2nd abortion then her tubes should be tied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. How incredibly generous of you to allow a woman a few *mistakes*.
Counseling is weighing the risks, and informing the patient of possible outcomes, not pressuring someone to cancel the abortion because of the religious views of the doctor,nurses or clinic. While I feel sorry that your DIL cannot now conceive, that doesn't mean you or she gets to make the choice for any other woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. There are many women out there
that are scarred for life for having aborions. Not all women are mentally and emotionally capable to handle it. It follows some thru life. Talking to someone or watching an ultrasound might help in making an unreverseable choice. I'm not pushing religion. But all I have to do is look at the pictures of my kids, their kids, and their kids. (3 beautiful great-granddaughters, 16 mos, 20 mos, & 3 yrs.) I love them to pieces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. So?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colinmom71 Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. And funnily enough....
Some of us have been scarred for life (both literally and figuratively) by continuing a pregnancy and suffering severe physical complications from that. That also has followed me through my life. Should my husband's vasectomy ever fail, I have no choice but to terminate to protect my health. But it's "kind" of you to permit us one such incident before you'd put me through another painful (and potentially fraught with more complications) abdominal surgery... :eyes:

There is no one "band-aid" application that is right and appropriate for all women who find themselves inadvertently pregnant. And all the adorable pictures of children in the world aren't going to change that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #24
70. My daughter developed HELLP Sydrome, an extreme form of pre eclampsia, in
her pregnancy, resulting in an emergency C Section. Ending the pregnancy is the only way to stop this condition from killing the woman. Fortunately, it was late enough in the pregnancy so that her baby was nearly full term and OK.

What happened to her and what happened to you are just two examples of what many women experience with pregnancy. Health risks are 10 times as great for a woman going through a full term pregnancy than 1st trimester abortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. people face difficult decisions all the time
and most of us manage to make those decision without the "help" of religious fanatics. everyone has to live with the consequences of the choices s/he makes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Women are not some helpless creatures
that need men to legislate their morality.
Your DIL made a choice.
Everyone should be given the same opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. See that's the thing about individual freedom. Your enlightened
approach still can't be imposed on others even if it's so that they can be "protected".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Extend a Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
37. There are many women scarred for life
by carrying a pregnancy to term and then giving away their baby. I think anyone considering giving away a baby should spend a couple of months talking to birth mothers on some of the adoption news groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
42. How many women are scarred to life because they had babies they weren't ready for?
Or because they were tied for eternity to their abusive ex?

How many women are glad they had abortions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. or... how many children were scarred for life by parents who didn't want them? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
50. Rick?
Rick Santorum? Is that you, dude?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
60. And millions of people have babies who shouldn't have had them. That is irreversible.
You can always adopt a child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
61. Get this POS off our board. Yeah, asshole, women are so
"emotionally" incapable. Fragile creatures, they are. I spit in your general direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
66. If a woman is not mentally and emotionally capable of handling an abortion, are they capable of
handling a pregnancy and being a parent? or are they capable of handling a pregnancy, delivery and adopting out their baby?

Choice is about having a child when you are ready. Did you know that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
69. It's not your place to make other peoples' decisions for them.
Edited on Fri Sep-21-07 10:51 PM by impeachdubya
Other people may make decisions you don't like. Other people may do things you don't approve of. Other people may do things with their bodies you find offensive or bothersome or that piss you off or make you mad or that you, yourself, wouldn't do.

Too bad. The reason you're inside your head and NOT theirs is because THEY are in charge of their lives. NOT YOU. It is not YOUR place to say "you obviously don't know what you're doing when you make this decision". That's not for you to say.

People can make decisions.... but if they make a decision you don't like, obviously they're not behaving rationally- they haven't been "educated" (or re-educated?) enough and as such are by definition incapable of making their own decisions?

...How convenient.

Man, I've had it with control freaks. Everybody wants to second-guess people who make decisions they wouldn't, or decisions they don't like. Too fucking bad. Run your own life, let other people run theirs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDenton Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. ultrasound has nothing to do with the risks
Edited on Fri Sep-21-07 05:07 PM by PDenton
It is just psychological intimidation.

I do believe people should be informed about the risks of abortions. But in a factual manner. At some point, people choose to have an abortion, and they have to live with the consequences, good or bad.

And for your own cause, has your DIL considered adoption? It is not for everybody but my aunt adopted a korean kid and he grew up OK. She's married to my uncle who is Greek, though, so they were already sort of multi-cultural. If you think about it, adoption requires alot more selflessness than just having a kid the old fashioned way- it is planned, you accept a kid that isn't your own DNA (that whole selfish gene thing), but it usually works out OK. There are support groups and books on adopting and issues related to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
63. Agreed. An ultrasound will do nothing to make the procedure
safer -- and any surgical procedure has its risks.

That's what needs to be discussed with a woman, not the medical personnel's personal opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. And how do you think women should be forced to have her tubes tied?
Dragged off in handcuffs to the local hospital?

You are suggesting that the STATE control an individual's health care, body and choices. Does that sound like America to you?

And besides, if a woman doesn't feel she can support a child, what business is it of yours?

What an amateurish post. Really, guys, you can send over better than this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. If you don't want a child
prevent it the easy way, get your tubes tied. And I don't believe this 'can't afford' excuse. If you can't afford it don't 'make' it. Education is the only way to stop abortions. Changing laws won't do it. Why put yourself thru an abortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. Why do we get
all the dumb trolls? Sheesh, can't the GOP send us some smarter ones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. hee hee -- we're talking major oxymoron here!
brains and GOP trolls just do not occur together in the same sentence!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
43. Why don't you say what you really mean? Those that can't afford to have a child or don't want one
should stop having sex.Isn't that what you mean? Why don't you do something worthwhile like contribute to Planned parenthood to get birth control for those that can't afford it or don't know about it? That way there would be fewer "mistakes" as you call them.BTW, why is it the woman's "mistake" anyway? Why don't you suggest vasectomy's instead of tube tying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
53. Why put yourself through birth?
Birth isn't any walk in the park. I bet abortion is a lot easier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #25
67. If I didn't have an abortion I'd have been a horrible parent, been scared for life, my child also.
Edited on Fri Sep-21-07 10:45 PM by uppityperson
Just don't have sex? Right. I guess I am a slut because I had sex and ENJOYED IT!! even though I wasn't trying to make a junior uppity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. take your rw BULLSHIT talking points elsewhere, nobody believes them here
Edited on Fri Sep-21-07 06:00 PM by ima_sinnic
who set you up as god with a sanctimonious holier-than-thou busybody opinion about what OTHER PEOPLE SHOULD DO? It is ABSOLUTELY none of your stinking business how many abortions someone has, why they have one or more, when they have them, or how they have them. That is between a woman and her doctor.
fuck you and fuck yr fictitious "daughter." NOBODY is "emotionally scarred" 12 years after an abortion. That myth was destroyed yrs ago as just more of the same old right-wing dumbass BULLSHIT propaganda.

how about the millions of women who have died after back-alley abortions, before they were legal, eh? were they "emotionally scarred," you sanctimonious TWIT?

don't like abortion? DON"T HAVE ONE, MORON. you're one of those people who condemn women who get abortions and then whine about the extra tax burden of unwanted babies who are abandoned to the public system--ORPHANS that you could care less about, HYPOCRITE.

on edit: oh, just wanted to add, about your "daughter"--the only reason she really wants a kid is so she can "fit in" at family gatherings! she couldn't care less about a real child, she just wants to be "accepted." isn't that special? if she wasn't so self-centered, she might actually adopt one of those children whose mother was browbeaten into not getting an abortion by people like you and gave up her baby. BUT SANCTIMONIOUS BUSYBODIES NEVER TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE MISERY THEY CAUSE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. Huh? What makes you think she would have changed her mind?
I had a friend who had an abortion in college and the doctor tried the old "you might not be able to have a baby later" bit but it didn't stop her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. Why not just sterilize the men who cause women to have the abortion?
The last time I checked, it takes a sperm and an egg to create a pregnancy.

Besides that, what about women who must have an abortion because of health reasons or because there is something seriously wrong with the baby? You'd force these woman to look at a baby they wanted but can't have?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. Interesting idea
and maybe after a person has a car accident or two, we can amputate their feet.

Nothing teaches a lesson better than punitive surgery!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
35. I think you're a misogynist asshole.
Honestly. I find it shocking how someone can take a personal anecdote and extrapolate a far-reaching social meaning from it.

Lots of women have abortions and do not feel lifelong emotional pain because of them. And showing a distressed pregnant woman who does not want to be an ultrasound to convince her to keep her "baby" is coercion of the worst kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. really. all they have to go on is emotional blackmail. PATHETIC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #35
64. It's a fat fucking Freeptard, typing in their jammies, pretending
to be something which they are not. Surprise!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
38. Oh really? Who is going to pay for it?
1. This is largely an attempt to make abortions more expensive so it's harder for women to come up with the money. It is also an attempt to shame women. Women in crisis pregnancy situations don't need shame. They need non-judgmental love and understanding, and help with whatever decision they make.

2. Do you not think women know there is a fetus in them when they choose to have an abortion? Do you think they're stupid? What new information is the ultrasound supposed to give?

3. There is no way to predict the future. Your daughter-in-law couldn't have known she would later have problems with infertility. An ultrasound certainly wouldn't have told her that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
45. i'm sorry for your daughter in law, and can understand
that this also effects you, but please consider that even if she had had an ultra sound there is no reason to think she would have changed her decision, or that she would have a child(ren) today.

Hind sight is so addictive- and often so warped.

Unless she was more than just a few months along- until the third month there isn't much to be seen-

Another thing to bear in mind is that very little is really known about the long term effects of ultrasound on either the developing fetus, or the mother- Many Md's believe that ultrasound is a useful tool when needed, but not a toy, or something to be used as if it was completely benign.

Your DIL is not alone in her suffering- many women (and men) go through hell when dealing with the inability to concieve, including those who never had an abortion. Women (especially) tend to be very critical of everything they have done/said/thought in search of an answer as to 'why' they cannot concieve,often after years of trying hard not to.

Forcing women to have ultrasounds as some kind of 'shock' tactic, or to fill them with guilt and misgivings, is not something i support- especially in a society which refuses to acknowledge any meaningful responsibility for this life once outside the womb.

If it was for the health of the woman, that's one thing- but to pressure her or make an often difficult decision even more so, then no.


peace,
blu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
52. Get off the fence. You support choice or you don't. Suggesting a forced tubal ligation is disgusting
It just is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
59. There are thousands of babies waiting to be adopted out there. emotionally scared?
come on. If she is ready to be a mother, there are plenty of kids who need good homes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
62. Fuck you all to hell, on so many levels. Sorry DU, this
asshole makes me see red.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
65. And how would viewing an ultrasound have helped your daughter be not emotionally scarred?
How would it help her get pregnant now? Are you saying she is emotionally scarred from getting an abortion and because of this now can't get pregnant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
46. Only if the father's get a testicularogram
kinda like a mammogram to make sure their sperm can be seen too since that is potential life too. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think they ought to make men view a cartoon with little anthropomorphic sperm
before they're allowed to masturbate, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. Then just before Brownback pops a nut (assuming he can)
he needs to view video of infant children with every birth defect known to man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
29. or force people in the McDonald's drive thru to see a video
(sorry my imagination isn't vivid enough to say WHAT video they should see...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #29
47. I can, Let me help you out here.
Watch a cow being slaughtered. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #29
49. Factory farms. Slaughterhouses. Triple bypass surgery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
41. How come no one suggests pregnant women, women trying to conceive, or women seeking an abortion
be required to watch a video of childbirth? I mean, if it's about educating the women-folk and all....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. Don't forget the audio.
Need those wails of pain here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. of course, they could show the PBS version where the woman barely makes a sound
Just concentrates on giving birth.

Or, better yet, they can show that one to people the want to ENCOURAGE to have children and the more horrifying ones to the women and teenagers who they think shouldn't have children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #41
55. Or watch a video of a two-month-old baby at 3 am
Yeah, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. ha! ha! You could just make them take a child to Chuck-e-Cheese!
That did it for my sister!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
54. This is already required in many states. One state is alone in requiring that the woman SEE the
ultrasound, but many states require that they are done to confirm the exact point of gestation.

The cost is incorporated into the price of the abortion. It's a more expensive procedure in states that require this and the additional counseling with a 24 hour wait period after counseling. This drives a lot of folks to neighboring states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
58. Now that makes sense. (except for the ultrasound part.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
68. I think they should do that even without the woman/ultrasound thing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC