Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don't use condum, take the vaccine. Don't look over here now, Merck's vaccine doesn't work.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:44 PM
Original message
Don't use condum, take the vaccine. Don't look over here now, Merck's vaccine doesn't work.
In a disappointing setback, a promising experimental AIDS vaccine failed to work in a large international test, leading the developer to halt the study. Merck & Co. said Friday that it is ending enrollment and vaccination of volunteers in the study, which was partly funded by the National Institutes of Health.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070921/ap_on_he_me/aids_vaccine_fails

But take the vaccine anyway, it makes Merck a ton of money. Okay?

Well good then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Um, the vaccine doesn't make Merck any money.
They're working on an HIV vaccine. It failed.

Let's see you come up with an HIV vaccine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. When the flying fuck...
...did Merck ever tell anyone not to use a condom? Is your argument actually so weak that you have to resort to completely making shit up?

Never mind, you can't even fucking spell condom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Just what sort of person...
is giddy when an experimental HIV vaccine fails?

Yeesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, Pat Robertson, for one.
Mazbe neo-nazis? Freepers? Certainly nobody who's ever had a friend with HIV. Jesus Christ.
But then AIDS was probably all an evil bushco plot, anzway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Drug companies
Drug companies make far more from treating symptoms than they ever could from a cure or vaccine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Then why is Merck testing an HIV vaccine?
Guess that proves you wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Not necessarily
Edited on Fri Sep-21-07 06:52 PM by Prophet 451
Merck may feel they could make even more money marketing the vaccine to populations unlikely to get the virus anyway.

EDIT: Also, if a vaccine was successful, they could charge whatever they liked for it, making up the loss of profits from treatment drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. I liken their STD vaccines to laser eye surgery: a luxury
but not necessarily a luxury I would want to risk going blind/dying for. The risk of dying from their HPV vaccine is very minimal... but still... How do you explain something like that to everyone? How is an HPV vaccine death justifiable in any way, when a simple safe sex lesson would have sufficed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That's why I'm against condoms.
Why put somebody at the risk of a potentially fatal latex allergy, when simple abstinence would suffice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. I'm against condoms when some joker puts em on his head.
That's just wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Fancy looking drink though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. Why use latex condoms?
Polyurethane condoms are available. They are completely latex-free, and they feel really good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. What shocks me is any DU member happy that Merck's HIV vaccine failed
Edited on Fri Sep-21-07 06:06 PM by tammywammy
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. What surprises me is that any DU member supports Merck
and it's drive to make sure that every female little child is forcibly injected with Merck's mandatory vaccine.

You support Merck and their huge flow of immoral funding of lobby money to congresscritters for mandatory immoral injecting unproven drugs into American female children.

I do not.

That is the way it is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. When did I say any of this:
"You support Merck and their huge flow of immoral funding of lobby money to congresscritters for mandatory immoral injecting unproven drugs into American female children."

I find it deplorable that in your hatred of Merck that you'd be happy that their HIV vaccine would fail. Disgusting.

I'd get the HPV vaccine if I could, and I'm all for insurance covering it and being widely available to people. I'm not for forced vaccination of Gardasil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. 'kay
Sorry.

I strongly desperately wish there is a solution for HIV positive, even if hater Merck was the one to deliver it.

Don't mean to dump on another hopeful believer.

Again, sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You're insane.
Edited on Fri Sep-21-07 06:20 PM by yibbehobba
You're against the creation of a vaccine that could save literally MILLIONS of lives if it works. How the hell do you justify that? Have you ever known anyone who has died of AIDS? It isn't a pretty sight. So quite frankly you can take your concerns about lobbying money and shove it, mkay? Fortunately, most people in this world are more reasonable than you.

Ya, I support the creation of an HIV vaccine. There, I said it. Must make me a freeper, eh? Jeezus, some people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. If Merck invents an HIV, more power to them.
Give them billions of tax payer buck. Give them fucking Disneyland. They'd earn it.

"You support Merck and their huge flow of immoral funding of lobby money to congresscritters for mandatory immoral injecting unproven drugs into American female children."

You confused the HPV vaccine with this experimental HIV vaccine, didn't you? Did you even bother to read it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Of course he didn't read it
All he had to see was "Merck" and "failed" and went off on his rant against how evil Merck and pharmaceuticals are. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. You don't have any clue what you're talking about, do you?
Beyond that, yeah, I know that an HPV (not to be confused with an HIV) vaccine interferes with the agenda of uptight fundy assholes who are deluded enough to think that the daughters they dragged to the purity ball will never have sex... and sometimes their neo-luddite agenda overlaps with the agenda of deluded anti-science neo-luddites on the "left".. but the truth is, no one is going to be forcibly injected with anything.

And vaccines save lives. I have a relative who still suffers from post-polio syndrome. Thank god my kids don't have to worry about THAT.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I think these people are one in the same.
Back a few months ago when all the debate was HPV vaccine, if you scratched the surface of these "deluded anti-science neo-luddites" underneath you'd find a sexist conservative prude who are really worried about women having promiscuous sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I noticed that, too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
28. Big Pharma is into BIG $$$$$$$$$$$$
They take university research, create a drug, and then make hundreds of millions.....


WE paid for the research (Universities) THEY get the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. You spelled "condom" wrong.
But don't let me interfere with your nonsensical rant against what is an extremely worthwhile pursuit, namely, the attempt to find an HIV vaccine.

Oh, sorry, I forgot: Bad, evil drug companies! Bad! Bad! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. well i think i have found one thing truly evil at du -- this OP.
Edited on Fri Sep-21-07 06:40 PM by xchrom
through their hatred of things ''Big Pharma'' they wish disease and death on others who would be other wise helped or cured or even prevented from contracting a horrifying and deadly disease,.

ronald reagan didn't sink this low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
focusfan Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
24. If a vaccine does work we will never get it anyway
I wonder if anyone in the federal government has ever died from AIDS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. oh ffs
Shut up with the :tinfoilhat: crap, you're disrespecting real people with a real disease, not engaged in some goofy theoretical exercise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
27. I know there are those that immediately attack you w/ these posts
to those I say



HA HA!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC