Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DOJ appeal reopens battle over Jefferson raid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 09:08 PM
Original message
DOJ appeal reopens battle over Jefferson raid
DOJ appeal reopens battle over Jefferson raid
By Susan Crabtree
September 21, 2007

The Justice Department is seeking to overturn a D.C. Circuit appeals court ruling that the FBI raid on Rep. William Jefferson’s (D-La.) office last year violated the Constitution.

The decision is reopening a separation-of-powers battle over how much protection federal lawmakers should have from government prosecutors’ investigations.

Federal lawyers are challenging a three-judge panel’s August decision that the 2006 FBI raid on Jefferson’s D.C. congressional office violated the Speech and Debate clause of the Constitution, which protects the separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches of government. Specifically, the judges found that an FBI review of Jefferson’s paper files when the search was executed exposed legislative material to the executive branch, and therefore violated the clause.

more...

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/doj-appeal-reopens-battle-over-jefferson-raid-2007-09-21.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. So it's ok to violate the constitution when the DOJ wants to
but they won't let employees answer questions about bush and the members of the DOJ violating the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'd like to know who lit a fire under the federal judges? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. surprise? They don't even have to bother to appear non-partisan....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The DOJ? Well, that there's the problem, isn't it? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. kicking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC