Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No end in sight for defense budget bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 07:27 AM
Original message
No end in sight for defense budget bill
No end in sight for defense budget bill
By Rick Maze - Staff writer
Posted : Friday Sep 21, 2007 13:40:56 EDT

After 13 days and more than 80 hours of debate on the 2008 defense budget, Senate leaders still have not found a way around the partisan divide over Iraq policy that will enable passage of the $647 billion policy measure.

Concluding a week in which the Senate couldn’t get enough votes for any Iraq-related amendments to overcome parliamentary roadblocks, Senate leaders said they need to do something.

“At some point we have to find a way to end this,” said Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., the Senate Armed Services Committee chairman and floor manager of the defense bill.

At least two more Iraq-related amendments are scheduled for debate Monday and Tuesday, with no signs that anyone can get the 60 votes needed under Senate rules to end debate and force action on legislation.

On Friday, the Senate deadlocked 47-47 on a Levin-sponsored amendment that called for a re-deployment of U.S. combat troops in Iraq, away from direct involvement in quelling sectarian violence and toward missions of training Iraqi forces, chasing down terrorists and protecting U.S. forces.

“I hope we can finish up the Iraq amendments as quickly as possible and move to the more than 100 amendments we have on the bill itself,” said Sen. John McCain, the Republican floor manager for the bill.


Rest of article at: http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/09/military_senate_defensebill_070921w/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. I just wanted to kick this in the hopes that some of our more "conservative" friends notice
that we're talking about spending 2/3 of a trillion, that's trillion with a 'T', dollars that we don't have in welfare to corporations worth hundreds of billions and that pay virtually no taxes.
:kick:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, tremendously profitable companies like Blackwater
that can kill innocent civilians without fear of accountability. And their indiscriminate killing of those civilians puts Americans troops even further at risk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. They're quarrelling over Iraq measures but...
no one seems to think that 647 billion is a bit much for a defense budget?

Add to that the supplementals, off-budget expenses, Homeland Security, CIA and other hidden and covert spy budgets and we're spending a TRILLION or so a year on "defense"!

And no one thinks this is just a little out of line?

Or asks what we're getting for it?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. I see this is still being ignored, well here's another kick. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC