CNN "Reliable Sources" on full court press to discredit Rather now...

[TankLV]

Utterly disgusting.

Laura Ingram/Ingraham/I Don't Care Or Respect Her To Spell Her Name Correctly as the main guest - gets 90% of the talking time.

Rather is crazy
Rather doesn't have a case
No proof
Rather a flip flopper

Now their quoting Fux's Asshole Neil Cavuto

[babylonsister]

1. There they go again, attacking the messenger instead of the message. nt

[Evergreen Emerald]

2. what a joke that show is

they are generally very adept at stretching credulity to avoid getting to the real issue. They are nothing but spin for the right wing propaganda machine.

[still_one]

3. Only television news source I watch is Bloomberg

haven't watched the MSM sources since 2004. There is absolutely nothing to be gained from them

Journalism is only entertainment as far as they are concerned

[spanone]

4. don't worry, about 8 people watch this pathetic show.

Rather's day will come in court.

[johnfunk]

5. Are Howie and Laura avoiding talk of the BIG REVELATION in the lawsuit -- about ABU GHRAIB?

Rather reveals in the complaint that the Bush Regime was applying pressure to CBS to stay silent about their discovery of torture at Abu Ghraib.

Also, keep in mind that Howie "Reprehensible Sources" Kurtz is married to a GOP operative.

[johnfunk]

6. They should retitle the show "REPREHENSIBLE SOURCES"

'Nuff said.

[BootinUp]

7. Or possibly, "Reliably Right Wing Sources". n/t

[malaise]

8. Rather is about to expose all of them

They're terrified.

Bravo Dan Rather.

[5X]

9. NPR was doing it too. Kneel down Conan and juan williams

were their usual dismissive selves on thursday.

[City Lights]

10. Reliable Sources is one of the most unreliable sources out there.

Howie Kurtz makes me :puke:.

I'm glad I'm not watching.

[UTUSN]

11. & that Ass't Prof of Journalism licking INGRAHAM---ewww!!!1 n/t

[abq e streeter]

12. They have to , really...

If they don't ,it just reveals ALL of them to be the bought and paid for prostitutes they are. I still clearly recall watching Michael Moore on the various morning shows promoting Fahrenheit 9-11, and watching Katie Couric et al going after him as if he was a serial murderer. Again, I understood it; if they gave him the credibility and respect he warranted, it would expose the fact that if these people were doing their job, Michael wouldn't need to do it for them. Same situation here; when you're about to be exposed as a fraud, you do whatever it takes to discredit the person about to expose you.

[spirit of wine]

13. Oh Good, more confirmation that the truth is surfacing

And the gatekeepers are now scared as to what how to backpedal on this with dignity. This should be fun to watch.