Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Before you take the word of people here at the DU that you are AUTHORITARIAN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 12:53 PM
Original message
Before you take the word of people here at the DU that you are AUTHORITARIAN
Edited on Sun Sep-23-07 12:55 PM by renie408
Take this test.

Does anybody remember The Political Compass?

I have been told several times lately that I am an authoritarian because I disagreed with Andrew Meyer's behavior and I felt that, while it was an overreaction by authorities, the incident at the airport with the MIT student was somewhat understandable. The fact that I think people should be civil about their disobedience and take some responsibility for their choices has gotten me singled out as an authoritarian. I have heard a lot of nasty little 'good German' comments aimed at many people here.

But before you believe the insult du jour here on the DU and start to think you are Authoritarian, take the test.

BTW...I fell -6.75 left/right and -7.08 libertarian/authoritarian.



ooops...forgot the link!

http://www.politicalcompass.org/index
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. and read Altemeyer's online book, too
Edited on Sun Sep-23-07 01:00 PM by 0rganism
http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~altemey/

This is an excellent free guide to authoritarian characteristics, from the guy who literally "wrote the book" on authoritarian psychology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Thanks.
What I have noticed is that the people pointing fingers and yelling 'AUTHORITARIAN' the loudest have a VERY black and white view of things. You either believe with them that any and all behavior should be allowable. If you think that people should work within a civil framework, you are not a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
31. Yes, here on DU
we are getting to be like the freepers.

We've always pointed to their seeing the world in black and white, lacking the ability to see the shades of gray, of nuances. And we've often thought of ourselves, still do, as being open minded and able to judge every issue on its own merit.

Sadly, many on DU (and on many Internet boards) hide behind their anonymity and hurl insults at others often before they even read the whole post. And a "suggestion" to un-recommend a DU thread is now being proposed and supported.

Not everyone who supports Bush on any issue is a bad guy; not everyone who hates Bush is a good one; not everyone who supported the war is evil and not everyone who wants our troops out, immediately, now, is a good one - see the adoration of Libertarian Ron Paul on DU.

And not everyone who challenges authority while inflicting harm on others is a good person. I wonder how many DUers would have supported the 60s group the Weathermen who planted bombs and injured and killed people for the sake of... was never clear to me.

So go ahead and stick to your opinion and I admire your courage for posting them here.

One suggestion, though, from my own experience. Say what you have to say, stick around to reply to some genuine comments (ignore the insults) and, once you've stated them, move on. Don't bother to keep repeating the same comments. Many here do not care to learn of different points of view and they just have to have the last world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. About that last part....
I have to confess that I never quite know when to walk away.

I will also say that it is honestly something I am trying to work on. But its hard sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's a cover, often thrown out by people who don't have a better argument.
It's easier to call someone a name than to produce a reasoned defense for one's position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. That's exactly the intent of the use of that word here
EXACTLY

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
51. Maybe, I am wrong. The point wasn't BEING authoritarian but rather serving,...
,...authoritarianism,...even unconsciously, for survival sake.

On the other hand, I may have missed the accusation. I often dismiss and ignore silly RW assertions.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've taken the test several times.
My scores shift a little, based on some questions that don't offer me the "right" answer, I think. Still, I'm always a left-libertarian, slightly to the left and south of Gandhi.

More enlightening, to me, is the position of the current crop of candidates:



Whether you agree with the placement or not, and the site does point out, repeatedly, that the positions are based on global, not local, definitions, I still fall very far from the majority of the candidates. Must be why I'm not happy with them as possible nominees for POTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. It makes sense to me that someone running for political office
might fall where the majority of Dems are. A political leader here in America would tend to believe in government/order and would also tend to be more pro free market. The thing I find interesting is that Edwards falls the furthest left/libertarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
44. Are the majority of Democrats on the authoritarian right?
If so, it seems that the party has been mislabeled, or misrepresented.

Gravel is the furthest left/libertarian, followed by DK. Edwards is the least right/authoritarian of the rest, it's true. That's probably why his message resonates with those left/libertarian-leaning people who won't support someone who actually matches their positions on issues.

If I were going to choose from the "top 3," Edwards would be the obvious choice. He has some better plans than the rest. In the general, he could get my vote if he would:

endorse HR 676, H Res 333, and HR 808, plus take on the high stakes testing piece of NCLB, and refuse to sign any ed-related legislation until it is gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Most fall on the shallow end of the authoritarian/right quadrant.
With the GOP candidates WAYYY up there.

Only Kucinich and Gravel fall left/libertarian, but not THAT far left/libertarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. Ironically,
Gravel and DK are closest to the "center!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
53. Darth Cheney probably goes in the upper right hand corner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
70. How do they know how the candidates would answer?
Edited on Sun Sep-23-07 06:00 PM by bear425
Just curious about that.

Oh, and I fall below and left of DK.

Economic Left/Right: -6.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.87
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #70
78. You fall about where I do.
That's a FAQ on the site:

15. How can you determine where politicians are honestly at without asking them?

How can you tell where they're honestly at by asking them? Especially around election time. We've relied on reports, parliamentary records, ... and actions that spoke louder than words.

http://www.politicalcompass.org/faq#faq15
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
73. Here's me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #73
79. No Wonder is right.
I fall in that same general area; it shifts a bit depending on how I answer a few questions that don't have my clear position as a possible answer, but it's always in that strongly left-libertarian range.

On the opposite end of the grid from the "leaders."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've already taken that test
Edited on Sun Sep-23-07 01:08 PM by midlife_mo_Jo
and I'm practically on the same spot as Ghandi. It's too long to take again to get the numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Look Mommy, some idget on the DU who is incapable of coherent conversation says I am authoritarian
I think I will take the test's word for it. Thanks anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. LOL, good thing you passed the test, if it says so online it must be true.
Edited on Sun Sep-23-07 01:13 PM by LeviathanCrumbling
Trust the test it is after all an authority on the issues.

Edit: DON'T QUESTION THE TEST!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. It's the first rule of ONLINE TEST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Instead, you should just accept the position of some anonymous internet poster with an agenda.
Geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Too bad authoritarians are immune to irony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Like the one who posted #6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. You're right. I should just consult my crystal ball. Or maybe you?
I guess I should just take the word of anonymous people here on the DU than a test developed to evaluate your responses without bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. I just took the test. I'm in Gryffindor!
http://www.thealmightyguru.com/reviews/harrypotter/docs/quiz-house.html

Crap, seems like none of my magic powers are working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. I am ashamed to say that just went 'whoosh'...
right over my head.

I feel so inadequate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #36
62. They're mocking you.
The references are to Harry Potter. Apparently, it's supposed to be funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #62
76. I got that part.
I didn't get why it was supposed to be funny. So I guess if you didn't think it was funny, either, maybe I am not as dense as I thought I was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. LOL! It's Hufflepuff for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. Then it is safe to say that you are not an authoritarian. Gandhi was in Hufflepuff.
Edited on Sun Sep-23-07 02:26 PM by LeviathanCrumbling
edit: Just to add one more time, DON'T QUESTION THE TEST!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's one thing I've never been accused of
There's cranky, opinionated, wacky, wrong, bizarre, too far left----and I wear them all proudly.

Authoritarian? Never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
60. DENIAL!
:)

Yep. I think that's why I used to be a stoner kid. Oops, I've said too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kdmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. I've been accused of being authoritarian a couple of times
Turns out I'm almost completely the other way:

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.41

Who would have thought someone could be further left than Ghandi?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Nooo...I would have to say that you are NOT authoritarian!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm a good little Nazi!!! NOT

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
39. LOL, mine are reversed
Economic -5.25
Social -6.05

I hesitated a bit about inflation vs. employment (chose employment) since high inflation, as was in Nazi Germany, could be used as an excuse for a "strong man" to take charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. Pretty far Left Libertarian...
Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.36

http://www.politicalcompass.org/printablegraph?ec=-9.12&soc=-6.36



TC




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. Kinda fun. Thank you for posting this.
I gave it a whirl and came up with -6.82 on the Left green quadrant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
19. Disagreeing with Meyers' behavior is understandable.
Condoning the way police silenced him is not. Normally, the crowd boos a person like Meyers into respecting everyone else and shutting up. I saw that happen recently in a town hall meeting with my congressional representative. One guy was butting in, speaking out of turn, yelling, the crowd took care of him without any physical contact. Various people simply told him to be quiet and wait his turn. He was very obnoxious, but he soon got the message. As Bill Maher pointed out in one of his shows, the shocking thing that was not touched on was the that the U. of Florida audience was so passive. They were just letting this guy ruin everything. That is more shocking to me than Meyers' behavior. Meyers had the right to speak. So did the crowd. I have a feeling that had you been there you would have said something to the kid and encouraged others around you to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. My specific problem
was that I didn't think that ALL of Meyer's behavior was covered under his right to free speech. No one interfered with his right to say what he wanted to say. When I said that his right to free speech shouldn't be allowed to interfere with the rights of everyone else at the speech, I was called Authoritarian. I also said that the right to free speech does not give you the right to resist arrest. Again, "You are just a good little German".

I have a confession to make...I don't get in the express lane when I have more than twelve items. I stop at stop signs. I believe that society needs some rules to function smoothly. In fact, I will go so far as to say that as a species, human beings WANT to know where the lines are drawn. Mindlessly following rules that impinge on your civil rights...THAT I don't agree with. I disagree with Bill Maher when he says that wiretapping is OK.

Anyway, the whole thing just pisses me off. It feels to me like the people shouting "AUTHORITARIAN" the loudest are the ones trying to bully others into falling into line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
40. It was Steven Colbert, with Solitarity
and I agree with you. Yes, he was obnoxious and should have been removed, but with four or five burly men, taser was too much.

But then, on DU, one post compared him to Jesus Christ!

And my comment was similar to Colbert, about the younger generation just being passive, clicking on nodding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. I think baiting authority is inane and counterproductive. Therefore I'm considered
by some on DU to be "authoritarian." What. The. Fuck. Ever.

If it makes some DU "victim" feel better to call me that, fine and dandy.

BTW, I've taken that test many, many times and always come out pretty left and VERY libertarian.

Who knows if the DU victim brigade or the internet is correct? I personally couldn't care less either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
46. "Baiting authority." Good term.
That's often what it is.

At least, it's what DU gets worked up about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. The few times
The few times I've been accused of it, I considered the source, read some of his other posts and realized it was just some kid who thinks prety much everyone not an anarchist is an authoritarian.

Give all due consideration to the accuser-- even if it illustrates him as nothing more than a youth. I began perceiving it as I would if some kid were in the car next to me, telling me I must be a part of the System because I stop at red lights and don't speed through school zones.

I just can't get too worked up about them. After a while, they become a bug on the windshield-- annoying, but innefectual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
23. Oh, This Is Hilarious
Renie, I've been accused of the same recently, and my results are right between Gandhi and Nelson Mandela.

Ah yes, the insult du jour. That's got me scratching my head, how liberal, "free thinkers" can be such absolute ideologists/moralists. And ironically, those likeliest to accuse you of being a lemming, sheep, or a good little German are the first to scorn the fact you are thinking independently of THEM.

Guess I'm only entitled to their opinion. Go figure. THANKS FOR THE TEST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. DING DING DING...if you think other than me, you are a good little German
You should all think the way WE do. WE are the only TRULY Democratic people here.

Gee, sounds like the GOP, just change the words a little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
27. I thought Meyer was an asshole and I'm -5.5 on the Libertarian-Authoritarian axis.
I'm -8.25 on the economic axis.

I get the feeling that some posters think that unless you are an outright anarcho-socialist you are a authoritarian "good German" :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
28. I just LOL and consider the source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAnotherGen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
29. This is funny
Thanks for the link!

Between Ghandi and Mandela . . . but ended up a bit more towards the bottom left hand corner than those two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
32. Depends On My Mood
Economic Left/Right: -3.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.26
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. Thanks for speaking out for some who just don't want to get involved...
in this divisiveness and name-calling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
34. There's a big difference between expecting civility and authoritarianism
If not, then I guess we should consider holding a protest sign to be the same thing
as blowing up a building (oh, wait, right-wing fundies do that).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
41. I don't feel like taking the test but...
When people support Meyer but not the MIT student there's something wrong with that. Personally I think the MIT student was within her rights but not Meyer. I can only humor the accusations that I am authoritarian from people who support both Meyer AND the MIT girl's actions.

Even then, I guarantee there will be moments these anti-authoritarian types will (or have) taken advantage of authority, or exerted it themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
42. Almost off the chart....economic Left/Libertarian -8.88 Social Left Libertarian -8.6
Your political compass
Economic Left: -8.88
Social Libertarian: -8.6

http://www.politicalcompass.org/facebook/pcgraphpng.php?ec=-8.88&soc=-8.622

The questions seem different to me from the last time I took this quiz.. They must change them periodically.

I was almost off the chart I'm so far Left.:7.....HOWEVER, I'm nowhere NEAR an Authoritarian....I'm as far away as one can get! FAR BOTTOM FAR LEFT on the chart.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
47. Here is where I fall
Economic Left/Right: -7.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.00

And I have found I have become radilcalized over the years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snarkturian Clone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
49. ya got me!
Economic Left/Right: -2.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.38
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
50. People are outraged about showing a receipt when something like THIS is
going on:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1883772

Where is the outrage there??

Fucking UNBELIEVABLE, what is going on on this board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. It's all symptomatic of the same thing. Obviously the outrages committed
in Louisiana are far worse, but it come down to the same mindset that pervades our nation.

As the noose tightens, the flock will begin to panic and they will go off in all sorts of ways, many that are self-destructive.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
52. The issue is the reaction
Every one of these stories gets this flood of DUers contratulating themselves that they would never suffer these consequences because they would never behave in any fashion that the authorities deem threatening.

But it could happen to anybody. You never knew when you're going to be deemed "obnoxious." It's a variation on the Nothing to Hide argument.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #52
59. Now Stop Making Sense. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vektor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
54. I'm with Nelson Mandela.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -7.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.38


I had no problem with the tasering that took place, yet I'm not terribly authoritarian. In fact, according to the test, I'm very much the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mogster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
56. I was a centrist in 2003
But have drifted left to about exactly in the middle of the left-lib square. We can do with a little _real_ governnment right now, though, and I'll support anybody wanting to reverse the proto-fascist global surveillance society we're sailing into at the moment.

Look at this:

http://www.politicalcompass.org/usprimaries2007
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Look at our candidates. My God. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaJudy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
58. Woo Hoo!
I'm hanging out with Ghandi, Nelson Mandela and the Dalai Lama.


Great neighborhood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. Whoo Hooo, me too!
Edited on Sun Sep-23-07 05:14 PM by ClayZ
"I'm hanging out with Ghandi, Nelson Mandela and the Dalai Lama."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #58
63. same here
economic/left-7.25, libertarian -7.44
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. You're further left and more libertarian than Gandhi
Gandhi is not quite as libertarian as all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
64. That was fun
-6.5 Left/Right
-5.59 Libertarian/Authoritarian

Less libertarian than you are, yet I disagreed with your stand on the Andrew Meyer incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. Further left than the Dalai Lama and more libertarian than Nelson Mandela n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
67. Economic Left/Right: -9.50; Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.92
But I've definitely been accused of authoritarianism. Go figure.

I fall somewhere to the left of Gandhi on both...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
68. I'm a Leftist LIbertarian--a couple of notches off from Gandhi in the lower left quadrant.
Economic Left/Right: -8.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.23

Right there with the Dalai Lama and Nelson Mandela.


I love being a contrarian and I love questioning conventional wisdom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
69. When this happens
and it always will, one help is consider that the original argument basis is flawed. I offer the salient fact that the problem is the taser. If you have kickbutt tactical SWAT forces you will be using them or you would never have them in the first place. No you have the wee problem of control, restraints and the inevitable overkill fiasco.

Taser have been SOLD to the pols(who went so far as to be shocked and force themselves to react with manly smile "he-ey-ey the water's not cold!"). The benefit? Gone the billy clubs and guns and triplicate reports, mandatory suspensions. Now victims of even brutal treatment will bear no outward trauma. And you can go on and on about the benefits, relative of course, of using tasers. So useful that they become routine. So routine that incidents like the recent one become inevitable and noticed by the accidents of celebrity or quirky interest.

Everyone talks about the tasering without talking about the taser. Everyone talks about the tasering and puts the constraints of the police a distant second in the information department. The interesting result is that BOTH the taser and in depth look at the police actions get short shrift. When done by Rove with evil, conscious manipulation we recognize the simplicity of the error. When people of good will play THEMSELVES, even Palast, we even dismiss the actual intent of the people pointing fingers and discussing. All this energetic ignorance is the murk which Rove clarifies, the ethnic strife of the political mind ready in its critical vulnerabilities to con men. That too is NOT what this particular issue is about, but is only an explanation why we are grinding gears, dividing and mounting slippery high horses.

People have tried to get to the issue but the problem is not from people coolly getting at the truth and implications of the actual incident but the ideologues, good-willed all, missing the physical point and letting the bad stuff play off against all our flaws.

It must always happen too, but among DU members as opposed to Rove, openness and awareness, not secrecy and sham, is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
71. Wow. So now an internet test trumps actual words someone posts.
Sheesh.

Talk about lack of nuance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
72. I dont' know about you in particular renie, but I wonder about some people here at DU -
If you think people should have to carry ID on them at all times...
If you think people SHOULD be "forced to go to the doctor"...
If you think it's appropriate for citizen-customers to have to submit to corporate searches without any probable cause except for being a customer of that corporation...
If you think people should be tased for
- carrying your own baby daughter out of the hospital
- going bonkers - IN A WHEELCHAIR
- just being really really annoying

You Just Might Be -
An Authoritarian!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #72
77. No, no, no, define corporate searches, no, no no...so maybe not. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
74. I am with Nelson Mandella
good company!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
75. Quite left wing, ever so slightly libertarian
Economic Left/Right: -7.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.36

Pretty much a garden variety socialist judging from the site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC