Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Armchair Psychologists: What does it say about someone

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 05:38 AM
Original message
Armchair Psychologists: What does it say about someone
Edited on Mon Sep-24-07 05:42 AM by Laura PackYourBags
who has absolutely zero reaction --completely reaction-less -- when
someone blatantly accuses them of something bad?

Watching HRC on MTP - Tim repeatedly accused her of of mismanagementof
the health care initiative and that she could have been the cause of stagnation
in this effort since the early nineties. Because of her, more and more people
have not been covered. Very accusatory question.

It did not faze her one iota. Wouldn't a normal person show some hint of
defensiveness to those remarks. Sure, she responded (in a much too lengthy
manner, IMHO) but no ruffled feathers.

Maybe she is just too cool for school - but for a moment there she scared me.
Like a Bush with different colors. He doesn't react to criticism either.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sociopath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. that's it! "Does not perceive that anything is wrong with them" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. No. It's not.
I say this without taking any position on Senator Clinton as a candidate. She is not a sociopath, and to suggest that she is, is a rather tortured mis-use of the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. That does not apply
to Senator Clinton. Context is everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Context? How does that apply. I don't think it has
anything to do with the subject - it was just her reaction to being accused of something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Context, as in Professional Politician on the Campaign Trail Giving Interviews
Really, you won't see any of them - not even sweet little Dennis - looking taken aback when asked about a boo-boo in their past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. How?
It applies because politicians are trained to not react in those situations. That is absolutely distinct from a sociopath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. It says that Hillary can keep her cool
I am not an expert about what went down in 1994, but from what I have read it looks like the Republican majority in Congress had decided to sink Hillary's proposals before they even read them.

They wanted to make the Clinton-Gore administration look ineffective as part of their grand plan to win back the Whitehouse in 1996.

The only problem with this plan was that they couldn't find a more dynamic candidate than Bob Dole.

I don't think Hillary feels responsible for how Congress reacted to her proposals.

But I do think she has learned from it and grown as a person and as a politician since 1994.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. PS - I have an honors degree in Psychology
And a Masters Degree in Political Science.

Just in case you were wondering ... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. And Obviously Have Better Sense than to Make Frist-Like Diagnoses!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildhorses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. i concur.
i graduated from harvard on the highway. does that count? :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I got a 98
on my 7th grade social studies mid-term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. That She's Had a Lot of Practice Sessions with those Questions
I usually don't watch MTP, but I did catch part of that interview (along with some others she's done recently) and it simply struck me as someone who has practiced answering the question the way she wanted to - just like any other politician. Russert couldn't get her to condemn MoveOn outright either; she mentioned McClellan and Kerry everytime the loaded question was asked of her.

Note: She's not my candidate - currently don't have one - but I don't loathe the air she breathes, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. What you said; she expected the question and was prepared. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. Normal people are supposed to cry at funerals, too. And if they don't there's something wrong
them, right?

I'd be careful in drawing that conclusion, about what 'normal' people do. Especially about the reactions of a public person who has been repeatedly vilified over the course of years—from her hairdo to how she dealt with her husband's infidelity—and in every public way imaginable. I imagine people build up a pretty thick skin after that. No, I don't gauge someone else's reaction by how I myself or how I suppose other people who I arbitrarily deem 'normal' would react.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDenton Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
14. it means the question was not unexpected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC