Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Forget Papers Please, it's Blood, Saliva and Breath please.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 02:59 PM
Original message
Forget Papers Please, it's Blood, Saliva and Breath please.
Weird how so many folks want to discount this story because it was initially linked from WND. Well here's the Colorado story with a video that explains what happened.

Many questions should be asked, beginning with WHY did the Deputy Sheriffs ALLOW this in the first place? A private company has government authority to roadblock innocent civilians and subject them to hardcore "telemarketer" tactics to give it up.

See a pattern?

http://cw2.trb.com/news/kwgn-invasive-checkpoint,0,2092732.story



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. If people were coerced, then I hope there is a major lawsuit
coming down that road. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Hi there.
So nice to see another friend around here ThomCat!

Coercion is often the sticking point. Indeed the sticking point when speaking of those awful "Good Germans."

Many here seem to think that it is no big deal to just open up your wallet, purse, mouth or vein if it's the government doing the inspectin' after all if I got nothin' to hide and I'm a law-abiding citzen...

Money was offered. Government was there allowing the proceedings to occur.

The part that bothers me the most is that a private company (and not even a big player like Halliburton) was given this kind of access to travelers.

Very odd indeed.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Hi Ripley,
I think fascist Italy is a more accurate model. Government and Corporate America are becoming so intertwined that both look at us as nothing more than a market to manipulate, or a resource to extract.

Abe Lincoln was very wrong. We don't have a government of the people, by the people, for the people. I don't know that we ever did, but if so, we certainly don't anymore. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Models.
Well, I'm not smart enough to know which socioeconomic historical model of government applies best to our situation right now. All I know is that the lack of any historical knowledge has allowed many people to become either oblivious (NIMBY) or submissive to such blatant actions documented from Ohio to Florida to Colorado to.. you name it.

But wouldn't you think that there would be agreement here that stepping stones towards those horrible governmental practices were WRONG? And that it doesn't happen over night? But in increments.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. You're absolutely right.
But if you post the defining characteristics of Fascism and point them out to most people they'll attack you as an anti-american fascist. How crazy is that? :(

People are so fanatically convinced that we are not a fascist county that they refuse to see it as it happens, which only makes it easier and more likely to happen.

People are convinced that we aren't a police state too, and that belief is making it possible for our government to get more and more invasive and intrusive. People insist on looking the other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Comforting I guess, to be in the "good student" seat.
I just got off the phone with an acquaintance who wanted me to do an "art day" at her 6th graders school. I told her what she was asking me to do was not very creative and open for the kids (too dumb and long to go into) and suggested something else. She told me Neil Boortz or however you spell it said Art was dumb anyway.

Weird stuff ensued. Never really knew this person, it seems. The minute it got political, she killed me as a friend. She even said this: I majored in Econ in college, so don't even go there!







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. once again, please call or write ORI to register a complaint
The Office of Research Integrity deals with these issues, and has authority to sanction investigators/research groups who act outside of the normal ethical bounds of research involving human subjects.

http://ori.dhhs.gov/

PIRE should definitely be sanctioned for conducting human subject research in a decidedly unethical manner (by using coercion in the "consent" process, first and foremost). Please, please, please contact ORI to let them know about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Combined with recent adds for 'Trace your ansestry with DNA' one gets curious
They looking for pure race or looking at populations for a possible genetic specific viruses?

We are the new Indians and they want us off their land. I don't put anything past the corporatists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. 'then the cop unzipped his fly and I said, Oh no, not another breathalyzer!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. which two federal agencies were they testing for?
that question remained unanswered. I would imagine TSA and DHS, but what do I know? The reason private companies are used for this shit is because they aren't bound by any of the constitutional amendments and they can close the books as to what they learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I would like to know that as well.
It's not like they're trying to cure cancer or AIDS with these surreptitious infringements on innocent people's lives.

You know if it was the IRS people would uniformly go ballistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. I find the story hard to believe because it's illegal.
You have to sign informed consent waivers to give blood and saliva. You sign them when you go in for urinalysis for a job, and they're unnecessary for field sobriety breath tests.

So my first question is, did it really happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Guess you didn't watch the video.
Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC