Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kay Bailey Hutchenson on cspan talking of funding $200 BILLION that Patraeus wants.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:37 AM
Original message
Kay Bailey Hutchenson on cspan talking of funding $200 BILLION that Patraeus wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. She said she sees no hesistation from Dems for this funding and that Patraeus worked
hard on this budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I must have missed the part where I elected Petraeus to office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. The military -by law is under civilian leadership: Bush has turned this around!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. She's spinning.
Hillary won't vote for it. I doubt Obama will. Kerry won't. Leahy and Sanders won't. Feingold won't. Kennedy won't. Boxer won't. I'm sure there are more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. She and Marsha Blackburn are
two of the most useless people in Congress. Marsha is in love with herself and Kay likes to show her ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. I Saw That She Was Up Next And Decided I Just Couldn't Listen To
her. Some may call it denial, I just call it "I KNOW" what she's going to say and it's plain HOGWASH to me! When Hillary and her got together earlier this year, I wonder what they talked about. When I heard that Hillary had gone to Texas to talk with her, it confused me because Ms. Kay is one HUGE Idiot LOVER!

I would research the visit, but I can't remember when it was... I just REMEMBER thinking it was ODD that Hillary was courting her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. Kay Bailey Hutchinson scored 100% with the Christian Coalition, though!
Although she's a total whore for defense contractors, she knows how to suck up to religious fanatics, too.

http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/Kay_Bailey_Hutchison.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. total distortion of Kids Healh car plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Ha--she is being asked about Craig ('terrible time for him"-ethics investigation
in the Senate she says)/
I read long time ago about the ethics probe but no follow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChickMagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
8. After fighting over how little to fund
children's insurance, asking for beau coup bucks for the war should look really bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. is that pin she's wearing a harpie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. asked id Judge throws it out should he come back to Senate?--She is beating
around the bush and will answer the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. In other words---She did not condemn his behavior (says he put in a quilty plea)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
14. Republican callers are kicking her ass too!
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 09:02 AM by Lasher
Guy just called her out on the flypaper ploy.

She's just plain lying. Says we're safer now than we were in 2001.

Oh now listen to this caller. She's really getting beat up.

Edit: I can't believe this! Now she's saying "We knew he (Saddam) had chemical weapons." That is soooo 2003. "He (Junior) was trying to protect us from another 9/11 with WMDs." Is anybody alive still buying that snake oil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
15. " ... when THEY put a missile into the Chinese Embassy." -- WTF?
unfuckingbelievable

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1766

Action Alert

U.S. Media Overlook Expose on Chinese Embassy Bombing

10/22/99

(Click here for an update on this story)

A detailed investigative article in the October 17 London Observer reported that NATO deliberately bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade last May, after discovering that the embassy was relaying Yugoslav military radio signals.

The report contradicted the public assurances of NATO leaders that the missile attack had been an accident. The Observer's sources included "a flight controller operating in Naples, an intelligence officer monitoring Yugoslav radio traffic from Macedonia and a senior headquarters officer in Brussels."

So far, the reaction in the mainstream U.S. media has been a deafening silence. To date, none of America's three major network evening news programs has mentioned the Observer's findings. Neither has the New York Times or USA Today, even though the story was covered by AP, Reuters and other major wires. The Washington Post relegated the story to a 90-word news brief in its "World Briefing" (10/18/99), under the headline "NATO Denies Story on Embassy Bombing."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
16. IIRC wasn't she the sponsor of the pentagon weather control program? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC