DemKR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-26-07 09:11 PM
Original message |
Edwards just kicked ass on GLBT issues |
|
I am so sick of barack and hillary...they are sounding like drones! What a bunch of wimps.
Oh...and GO DODD AND KUCINICH ---- you guys are so winning the debate!
|
Pachamama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-26-07 09:12 PM
Response to Original message |
liberalmuse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-26-07 09:12 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I wish Kucinich were more than a blip in the poles. |
|
And I must say, SHUT UP TIM! He's going one on one with Hillary. Gawd! Get over your Clinton fascination already!
|
DemKR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-26-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Look at the "TALK CLOCK" |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 09:14 PM by DemKR
http://chrisdodd.com/talkclock/nh_d_2How convenient that the non-top tier candidates don't get enough time to talk. What the FUCK??? And Gravel was told "Give others a chance!" HA! Give me a freakin' break
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-26-07 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. It's worse this time than any previous debate! |
|
Russert himself close to 12 minutes and Gravel and Kucinich down at about 3 minutes!!
ONLY Hillary is over 10 minutes!!
|
MiaCulpa
(741 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-26-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Someone commented on my site today that she received a call asking which of the Dem candidates she was likely to support in the primary. When she said Kucinich, she was told by the person that they didn't know who that was, and could she pick someone they had on the list.
this person is also a blogger I have known for a while, so I believe this is a true account. 'splains much about Kucinich's low ranking.
|
benddem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-26-07 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
12. the reason he's a blip |
|
is they don't give his or Gravel's name as a choice.
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-26-07 09:15 PM
Response to Original message |
4. He did far better than I expected ... even if not identical to MY stance. |
|
I personally don't believe "whom people love" is on any list of problems in this nation or world. It's a no-brainer ... marriage between any two loving adults should be undeniable.
|
Breeze54
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-26-07 09:18 PM
Response to Original message |
7. How? Has he changed his stance against gay marriage? |
maximusveritas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-26-07 09:19 PM
Response to Original message |
8. How is he different from Barack and Hillary on this issue? |
|
There's no difference as far as I can see when it comes to their current positions on this issue. The only difference is when you look at their past records. Edwards opposed even civil unions in 2004. Obama and Clinton both supported them at that time.
|
Xipe Totec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-26-07 09:22 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I Love Edwards, he's my first choice |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 09:22 PM by Xipe Totec
but it seriously pisses me off to see other candidates thrashed, especially on DU.
That's just not right.
Say what you want FOR your candidate, but if you speak trash of the others, that will damage us when we go up against the real threat, the Republican candidate.
Democrats are on the same team.
Try to keep that in mind.
|
DemKR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-26-07 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Disagreeing with someone's tone is not trashing them |
|
Edwards just made a pitch to those who supported gay marriage and said he's not going to enforce his views on anyone. Obama and Hillary gave the usual mumbo jumbo We'er tolerant and more people should be tolerant, Thanks Tim.
|
Xipe Totec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-26-07 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
Period. The rest is superfluous.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 11th 2024, 09:20 AM
Response to Original message |