Verizon Rejects Messages of Abortion Rights Group

[EV_Ares]

Comment: Verizon, always seems to be on the same page as the Bush Admin. This is one of the companies that along with AT&T was ok with helping them do the wiretapping thing. It is certainly apparant where Verizon stands as far as privacy and their stand on women's rights.
________________________________________

By ADAM LIPTAK
Published: September 27, 2007

Saying it had the right to block “controversial or unsavory” text messages, Verizon Wireless has rejected a request from Naral Pro-Choice America, the abortion rights group, to make Verizon’s mobile network available for a text-message program. The other leading wireless carriers have accepted the program, which allows people to sign up for text messages from Naral by sending a message to a five-digit number known as a short code.

Text messaging is a growing political tool in the United States and a dominant one abroad, and such sign-up programs are used by many political candidates and advocacy groups to send updates to supporters. But legal experts said private companies like Verizon probably have the legal right to decide which messages to carry. The laws that forbid common carriers from interfering with voice transmissions on ordinary phone lines do not apply to text messages.

The dispute over the Naral messages is a skirmish in the larger battle over the question of “net neutrality” — whether carriers or Internet service providers should have a voice in the content they provide to customers.

“This is right at the heart of the problem,” said Susan Crawford, a visiting professor at the University of Michigan law school, referring to the treatment of text messages. “The fact that wireless companies can choose to discriminate is very troubling.”

Link to rest of story: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/27/us/27verizon.html?hp

[rodeodance]

1. I did not realize that this issue (censure) was part of the Net Neutrality issue:

....The dispute over the Naral messages is a skirmish in the larger battle over the question of “net neutrality” — whether carriers or Internet service providers should have a voice in the content they provide to customers.

[TreasonousBastard]

2. This is not a good thing. Abortion rights is not...

at all unsavory, and it is this sort of controversy that is at the heart of a democracy.

We could have a lot of fun arguing over Verizon censoring Nazi messages, but there is no excuse for this.

If we can't force them to carry all legal groups could we at least have the list of groups Verizon is blocking?