Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary wouldn't even answer a baseball question

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
u2spirit Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:26 AM
Original message
Hillary wouldn't even answer a baseball question
Cubs or Yankees. she said she would alternate. The only answer she gave about anything last night was in regards to Sanctuary cities. It was better than anyones. She is a joke and I see right through her. Tweety was actually correct last night in saying she sidesteps every question so she can bash anyone else who comes out with a plan. I have never posted a bash Hillary thread and don't plan on doing it again but her performance last night had my head hurting. Seems to me Kucinich and Edwards were the only 2 making sense or doing any straight talking, and I am an Obama supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's because a poll hasn't told her what to believe yet.
And those are major primary states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
u2spirit Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Of course potato head's questions
were classic gotcha attempts on every candidate. I wonder if he'll hammer the rethugs as hard next month. Regardless, her answers were terrible. When he questioned her judgement on healthcare and Iraq, she talked around the healthcare issue and didn't address the Iraq vote at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
31. wrong post
Edited on Thu Sep-27-07 08:16 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a kennedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. I always thought Bill Clinton's presidency was run on polls too...
he'd give a speech, put forth some ideas, and see if they'd float. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. You Mean Like The Elected Leader Of A Republic Or Something?
Governing on the polls means putting forth ideas based upon the polls. Putting forth ideas and seeing what the citizenry thinks of them is NOT governing by the polls. It's what a good elected official does.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
u2spirit Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. There's a fine line
between leading and following. Leading is being bold and speaking forcefully and clearly on ideas. If the ideas are rejected you try something else. Following is making a speech giving broad, vague ideas and then sitting back and seeing how the debate goes before you decide what details you choose to make your own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Still A Lot Better Than. . .
. . ."i don't govern based upon the polls." How's that working out for us?
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. That would have worked well for segregation, gay rights, immigration, civil rights.
Right Mr. Professor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
u2spirit Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. excellent point
NM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. No It's Not
Those initiatives occurred based upon exactly what i said.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Read It Again
In fact, it's EXACTLY what happened. A president made bold statements about what the planned to do, and then determined it's acceptability, and furthered it based upon it's acceptance. (See FDR, JFK, Truman and LBJ.)

You just told me i'm correct.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #15
32.  Unlike Our Current President Who Brags About Ignoring The Polls And Not Giving A Shit What People
Think
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #32
39. That Was My Point, Too
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. And yet she was the clear winner.
Go Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
u2spirit Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. She was?
Everyone is entitled to their opinion but I find it hard to pick a debate winner with 7 or 8 debaters where each get a limited amount of time. If she won, no one else lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Actually if she didn't lose, she won.
With her standing right now, her performance last night did not hurt her in the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
u2spirit Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. The beltway types are saying that
because of the horse race aspect. However, her inability to be forthcoming about absolutely anything will hurt her chances of winning the general because people like me are not going to feel any extra motivation to campaign for her. Sure, she can metaphorically stand and wave and say nothing and potentially win the nomination, but that will not light a fire under anyone to help her in the general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazyriver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. I'm with you on that. I've tried to keep an open mind about Hillary
but after watching her "performance" last night (and that is exactly what it was, and a bad one at that), I have lost whatever faith I had in her. I wouldn't have supported her or voted for her in the primary as I think there are better Democratic candidates, especially given the times in which we live. After witnessing her cackle at most of the questions posed to her (as she's doing regularly now) and then hearing her robotic evasive answers, all I see is a big fake. Combine that with her back door support for the Iraq War and her enabling of Bush and I would certainly not work for her in the general election. I now have doubts about casting a vote for her at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
49. I have NEVER criticized a candidate on appearance or personal traits, BUT
Hillary, LOSE the phony cackle.
It has become like fingernails on a blackboard, especially when being asked questions that involve LIFE or DEATH for thousands/Millions of Human Beings.
NOT a laughing matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. OOPS! I must post a retraction.
I once criticized Biden for his hair plugs.
Lately, I've been softening in my opposition to the Bankruptcy Czar.
He sounds like a positively acceptable alternative when sharing a stage with Clobama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beer Snob-50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. the only ones who are forthcoming about anything
really stand very little chance of winning. I would love to support Kunsich (I know I mangled his name so burn me) but I feel he has no chance of winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
u2spirit Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. I think Dennis would be a great leader
and that shows how utterly fucked up our election process is. By the end of January Hillary, Obama and Edwards were deemed by the lamestream press as the frontrunners and by god they can't be wrong so it's not as much that those 3 have been shoved down our throats as much as the others get no airtime or even an equal chance during the debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beer Snob-50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. but couldn't it be said that dennis tells it like it is
and that scares people too much? someone yesterday looked for someone who always told the truth, this nation cannot handle that type of politican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
36. People like you, and i am assuming
would rather shoot a nail in their eye with a nail gun than to EVER vote for HRC. Just guessing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
40. Or even bother to go out and vote
My mother is from the church of vote early and often, but she didn't bother with a recent local primary because none of the candidates represented anything but more of the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
47. She was? Just becuase Timmy says so I don't think so
of the first tier, Edwards won

Of the seocnd tierit was a tie between Dodd, Biden and Kucinich

And in some things, like foreign affairs, Todd and Biden ate her lunch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnotherGreenWorld Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm glad Russert asked the tough questions!
Like what's your favorite baseball team! That's my issue!

God, Russert's an idiot. I hate that piece of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. I Remember Her Getting Slammed Wearing A Yankees Cap
I think it was during the 2000 campaign. Supposedly she was pandering by wearing the cap. Sheesh...get a grip.

Sidestepping a stupid question? You bet. I'm not electing a handicapper, I'm looking at a candidate who can restore some balance to this country. I could care less about anything else.

BTW...as an Obama supporter...and he's my junior Senator...can you explain why he failed to vote yesterday, but was able to show up at the debate? As a constituent, his voice on the Senate floor is what I want to hear, not in a TV game show.

Cheers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
u2spirit Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. I have been dissapointed in him lately
He was too sick to fly to DC and vote on the Biden and Liarman ammendments but had the moxie to show up and put on what can best be described as a non inspiring debate performance. If he continues to play softball on the campaign trail, my primary vote will be up for grabs. Just because I love Obama doesn't mean I have to defend him to the death the way it seems Clinton supporters do. I think quite frankly that one of the reasons DU anti Hillary types are bothered by her is that her supporters refuse to acknowledge even one negative thing about her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #16
34. Very Good Observations
As always I must put my caveat that I am blissfully uncommitted...I don't support any candidate nor do I dismiss any. All have brought something of value to the campaign and I'm listening to it all and will see how things play out as the primary season really gets going. I proudly voted for Senator Obama in '04 and will gladly do so again should he seek re-election in '10...and I appreciate the fresh approach and people he's brought to the party, but I do have concerns about his resolve and experience in being effective in the fishbowl of the beltway. I tend to believe his time hasn't come yet...and that he'll be both a far better manager and candidate if he learns from this process.

I'm no Hillary fan, either, but I can't ignore her qualifications and organization. She's run a very good campaign and brings a boatload of experience that will be needed in cleaning up the messes that are sure to be awaiting whomever takes over on 1-20-09. I have plenty of concerns about her corporate ties, but I also can't ignore the polls and surveys that say she'll be the party's nominee. There is no perfect candidate...anyone who believes this is sure to be letdown sooner or later. I can and will support whomever the primary voters feel is the best candidate, but until those votes come in, I'll remain an observer.

Cheers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
u2spirit Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. I think the one thing about Hillary that IS like Bush
is that her strength is in organization and campaigning, not necessarily governing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. I Thought The 90's Were Goverened Pretty Well
Here's the irony. People around here call Democrats "spineless" but hate Hillary cause she's too much of a partisan fighter. When she appears to compromise, she's "Bush-Lite" but when she attacks or stands up, she's divisive? There's no winning for her here on that front.

Many of the slams I hear about Hillary here...as well as on the street, are right out of GOOP talking points. They're images that have been crafted through the corporate media over the years that also appears to fuel a distorted image of her. So much of the anti-Hillary stuff I read here are the same as I hear from Rudy supporters...almost verbatim..."she's un-electable, she's "bitchy", she's a panderer..." it's like they're boxing a cartoon rather than the candidate and the issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. calling her out on her hawkish views are certainly not a GOP talking point..
Edited on Thu Sep-27-07 12:54 PM by frylock
they embrace her for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #41
52. Partisan fighter?
I really don't remember Hillary taking the lead in any significant Congressional fight since she has been in the Senate.
There WAS that Video Game thing, and the Flag Burning. She was clearly a leader on those controversial issues.


Refresh my memory and mention a couple of the tough fights where she showed that she was "a partisan fighter".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Vast Right Wing Conspriacy Ring A Bell?
Jim Webb is the first Senator I can recall in a long time who, as a freshman, was able to sponsor some substantial legislation. I don't recall anything Senator Obama has done nor do I recall any major legislation ever fronted by Senator Edwards. Inversely, I can recall Senator Biden taking the lead on several important fights over the years and you see how much credit he gets for his controversial stands. Six of one, half a dozen of the other. The Senate is a byzantine organization...still an old boys club where "experience" trumps ideas.

From the moment she entered the public stage in '92, she's had a target on her. She's had a far rougher time than people dare give her credit for. Not sure why. Maybe you can enlighten me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Speaking of VRWC,
Yes, the VRWC did attack Hillary, and Hillary has proved she can take a punch.
But WHERE has she ever gone on the offensive AGAINST them?
Her husband even offered the VRWC the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

By all appearances, Hillary has joined them, not fought them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #16
43. Damned if he did, damned if he didn't
If he hadn't shown up last night, the stories today would all be about how he was afraid of Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. well joy for you. if this is not bashing hillary on complete frivolity
i dont know what is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
u2spirit Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I said it was a bash Hillary thread
I just said I hadn't done it before and don't plan on making a habit out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. yeah but find something substantial to bash her with, this is just stupid.
and more reflective of your pettiness than her attitudes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
u2spirit Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. The baseball non answer
is just a metaphor for nearly every question asked that she refused to give an answer. My point was that if she won't even answer a qustion about baseball, well you know the rest. She refused to talk about Social Security, her Iraq vote, Iran. Is that enough substance for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
38. What's enough for me is a Dem who is a fighter in a campaign who will put decent
people on the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedinglib Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'm very concerned??
Why did Hillary sign-on with Joe Liarman to give more authority to the king? was it to invade Iran or what? she never answered the question?
Will she be another Bush company working for the weapons contractors?
B-lib
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
14. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
So. That's how she WINS all the debates ....she won't answer any questions. HA HA HA HA HA ..Those Obama guys can't stop can they.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Wins. Now that's a funny word.
You keepin' score or is Fox News?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
21. Wise women as it is no win response. Now she has posts like this one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
23. I believe in the separation of Sport and State
Whose country do you want to live in? A Cubs fan or a Yankees fan?

Pretty soon, you'll have a baseball club owner as president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
33. It's a stupid question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
35. No shit. She was terrible last night. And that f'ckn laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
42. So you must pick a baseball team?
in order to be qualified for the presidency?

I have news for you: lots of people don't have a favorite team. I've lived my adult life in five major cities, four of which have baseball teams. I like them all. I could not care less. I don't care between the Cubs and the White Sox. I'm happy if the Twins or the Yankees or the Red Sox win.

Yo, this is the stupidest objection to Hillary Clilnton I've ever heard.

Go Cubbies.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. What has baseball to do with the presidency? ...
or even biblical passages?

Why do our candidates even agree to go into a confrontation with each other under Russert's leadership?

Sheesh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
46. This might actually be a good time for her to return to her Cubbies roots
seeing as how their AAA farm team is located in... Iowa.

The issue* first came up when she ran for the Senate in NY. Originally her opponent was to have been uber-Yankees fan Rudy Giuliani. It was a subtle way for the repukes to continue their "carpetbagger" meme. Funny how they never called out Mike Bloomberg, from Lynn, Mass., as a lifelong Red Sox fan, which he was (he says he's now in "recovery").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
48. Cubs or Yankees?
Odd question. Are these two teams traditional rivals. Dude can't even ask in intelligent baseball question. Yankees or Sox, Yankees or Mets...those would at least make sense.

I don't mind the occasional "fluff" question. At this point, don't most of us know where the candidates stand on major issues (or at least know what the candidates want us to think their position is)? You can learn (I think) a lot about each candidate in their responses to fluff questions. Thats why I enjoyed the UTube debate and have appreicated the number of debates the Dems are holding this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Hillary says she is a Cubs and a Yankees fan
She grew up in the suburbs of Chicago as a Cubs fan.

When she was running for Senate she said she was a Yankees fan since she was a little girl.

Both the Cubs and Yankees have an opportunity to be in the World Series this year. They might play each other for the title.

The question makes perfect sense (if one was paying attention) and this "fluff" question illuminates a possible piece of disingenuous that is charge against her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
53. Clinton sits on the fence and many people buy her bullshit!
The corporations pay her to sit the fence and spread political lines and her supporters eat it up as the truth. How anyone doesnt see that a vote for Clinton is a vote for war is not reading between the lines, they are closing their eyes and believing her every word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC