Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBC: Graham (R- S.C.) claims Bush will Veto money for troops

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 11:27 AM
Original message
BBC: Graham (R- S.C.) claims Bush will Veto money for troops
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Senate attached hate crimes legislation to a must-pass Pentagon spending bill Thursday, but opponents predicted it ultimately would fail either in negotiations with the House or by presidential veto.

``The president is not going to agree to this social legislation on the defense authorization bill,'' said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. ``This bill will get vetoed.''

Nonetheless, the Senate agreed by voice vote - with no dissenting votes - to attach the hate-crimes provision to a pending defense authorization bill that designates billions of federal dollars to the Defense Department and the Iraq war.

Writing violent attacks on gays into federal hate crime laws is an appropriate add-on to legislation funding the war, Democrats argued, because both initiatives are aimed at combating terrorist acts.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6953772,00.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. i think bush will just conjure up a signing statement for this amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I am happy to see him backed in a corner - to veto armor for troops
and pay raises. It was a shrewd move by the Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusEarl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Perhaps this is a good reason, not to have a line item veto!
I predict Bu$h will use one of his famous signing statements to disregard this legislation, but it's a good effort by the Dem's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLib at work Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. I cannot believe that asshat Cornyn called this "SPECIAL INTEREST LEGISLATION"!!
``I think it's shameful we're changing the subject to take care of special interest legislation at a time like this,'' Cornyn said on the Senate floor.



After all the dirty tricks and underhanded crap they have pulled, it is jaw-droppingly, breath-takingly, incredibly, outrageously disgusting of the Repukes to object to this....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC