I find it ironic that when Matthews talked about this exchange yesterday, the part he didn't discuss, posted below, was more newsworthy than what he did concentrate on. Typical.
War Protesters Flock to Sen. Byrd at Hearing
The chamber’s oldest member finds a cheering chorus in Code Pink — a group many lawmakers seem uneasy about.
by Julian E. Barnes
WASHINGTON — After 4 1/2 years of combat and hundreds of billions of dollars in funding, the debate over the Iraq war — at least on Wednesday — came down to two dozen people dressed in fluorescent pink and the oldest member of the U.S. Senate.0927 05
Sen. Robert C. Byrd (D-W.Va.), who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee and turns 90 in November, denounced President Bush and vowed not to rubber-stamp the administration’s request for nearly $200 billion more in war spending. Cheering loudly were war protesters from the group Code Pink, now a fixture at every Washington hearing even tangentially related to Iraq.
“Are we really seeking progress toward a stable, secured Iraq? Are we?” demanded Byrd.
“No!” shouted protesters.
“What do we mean when we say, ‘Support the troops?’ ” Byrd continued.
“Bring them home!” one Code Pink member shouted.
On went the call-and-response, protesters shouting approval as Byrd preached.
“In the fifth year of this terrible, misguided conflict, this senator — yeah, this man from the hill country — believes that it is time for a thorough evaluation of the Bush war in Iraq,” he said.
“Amen,” shouted his chorus.
As he finished, the Code Pink members rose in applause. “That is what a Democrat looks like,” shouted one.
Most Democratic lawmakers seem uneasy with Code Pink. Its name mocks the Bush administration’s color-coded terrorism alert system, and members frequently get arrested in protests.
more...
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/09/27/4137/