Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The anti-Universal Health Care people lost out to Michael Moore today!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:34 PM
Original message
The anti-Universal Health Care people lost out to Michael Moore today!
The U.S.A anti-Universal Health Care people keep emphasizing "long waiting times" when referring to health care in my country and others with Universal Health Care!
I'm so glad Michael Moore, on today's Oprah show, finally got the chance to point out that in Canada, France, U.K. and Germany etc., the waiting times are for elective or non-life threatening or serious problems. That phony scare tactic....that you Americans will be dying in the streets waiting for care....he exposed for the lie it is. I know this from personal experience. Someone close to our family had a sudden emergency out of the blue and was helicoptered to Hamilton, Ontario for immediate, life-saving surgery. (Cost...zero.) It was good to see Michael able to really speak to the insurance person. He showed her up for the shill she is. Oprah's show was so much better than the phony so-called debate John Stossel had going on 20/20 a week or so ago!

Hang in there America. You'll get Universal Care like the rest of the civilized world! YOU DESERVE IT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. You know what pissed me off, that fucking Insurance industry President...
She used damned near EVERY single buzzword to prop up the idea that a government run system is a bad idea. She even called it "foreign"! Which, to Americans is damned near a slur, if there ever was one. She kept up talking about a "Uniquely American" solution to the problem, every time I hear that phrase I think, "Oh shit, somebody's going to fuck it up".

Seriously, why the fuck should we in the United States try a system that hasn't been proven to work yet, and ignore systems that DO work already. What the fuck is wrong with taking "foreign" ideas and adopting them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. sounds like she can only make her point through deception/ lies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I also keep hearing anti Universal H. C. people referring to "government controlled"
health care....or "government run" care. This is another lie. Our doctors and hospitals run everything and make all decisions. All the government does is pay the bills!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I had to click off 35 minutes into it or my foot would have been
through the screen. I can afford to replace the set, but large item pickup was yesterday and the catharsis wasn't worth it.

Fluffy was definitely playing to the 30 something churchgoing suburban base of the GOP.

As long as she keeps getting paid for it, she doesn't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Her thought processes were slowed by the amount of botox in her face.
I'm surprised she could blink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. I'm watching now and that's what I was thinking.
She got that medical procedure--for denying how many others???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Right. People are getting terminal cancer because insurance won't cover...
...the more-expensive-but-thorough tests, yet she gets enough botulism injected into her face to drop an elephant, and probably wrote it off as a business expense. After all, this was a PR gig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. All her talk about "experimental" procedures...
I'm able to write this because of an experimental procedure that FIVE of my doctors went to bat for me for.

Three of them actually called the insurance companies THEMSELVES.

I needed a stent placed in my cranium to open an artery and would not be sitting here without it (I might be sucking up oxygen in a hospital bed, but not much else).

My insurance coverage--and I supposedly have a great plan--said no three times.

God help me, I cost my fellow CIGNA "customers" money. Somehow, I don't think many of them felt the pain that much--but CIGNA sure as hell seemed to.

My premiums paid for her wrinkle-less neck (although of course, CIGNA didn't, but we still did), but it wasn't going to pay to let blood into my brain.

What a sick, fucking, disgusting tool she was. May I never meet her face to face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #24
53. I can't prove it, but I think they automatically deny almost every claim.
They save all kinds of money because at least half of the people won't challenge the initial denial, whether they are supposed to be covered or not. Then, those that do challenge it, they can tell the denial was a clerical or computer error. I fucking hate them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sweet Freedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
50. I was thinking she had all that botox pumped into her
because it's the only way she can keep a straight face when she lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. That may have been part of the decision process on it, I don't doubt. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sweet Freedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #52
60. What do you want to bet that she got her insurance to cover it? /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. What's wrong with it? No profit for those on the take, that's what.
I'm so frickin sick of being lied to about why our dem leaders refuse to support the ONLY sane solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. She also said hospital and doctor's offices HAVE TO MAKE A PROFIT....
even though she didn't elaborate on that at all. The fact is that that is a LIE, the hospitals in my area are run by one of two health care system, BJC and SSM, both of which are NON-PROFIT, and affiliated with either Catholic or Jewish charities and religious organizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Not to mention that single payer doesn't cut out profits for doctors or hospitals...
only insurance companies.

Spin, spin, spin... and hardly any dems willing to stand up and set the record straight... most are happy taking insurance industry $$$$ so they just stand by and let the lies stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. There is a presidential candidate that wants the profit out of health care.
He also saw that the war was about oil ( once again $$$ ) and voted no. I dont think Americans want honesty in politics though. Too bad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nealmhughes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. What a crock! Every hospital in North Alabama is a non-profit! The large ones in Bham are either
affiliated with the University of Alabama or else the Catholic Church!

The largest in Alabama is in Tuscaloosa and is part of the UA system!

I guess 4 and a half million people don't count by her math. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #35
54. All they have is lies. n/t
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 10:09 AM by redqueen
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #17
49. Hello!
Your right on the money. NO one should make a profit on sickness and suffering. They can break even, and pay they bills not the Bill Frist's and Karen Ignagni's should not reap a whirlwind on our pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Aw jeez man...
...the last time I heard that phrase "uniquely American," it was Bush* referring to a woman working 3 jobs, like it was a fucking good thing.

Hearing "uniquely American" in reference to solving the health care crisis here, I'm thinking that they mean protecting the current profit margins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. ding




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. "Uniquely American" almost always means that someone is making a buck off it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. That woman should be ashamed of herself. She obviously has NO conscience!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Botox can do that to a person. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Yup and so can greed. nt
Edited on Thu Sep-27-07 08:24 PM by TheGoldenRule
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty quoin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Can you answer me a question.
A friend of mine, who is an ex-pat Canadian, threw a curve ball at me last month. She and her brothers are in their seventies. One of her brothers needed hip surgery and she said it took six months to get it in Canada. Then she explained that each doctor is only allowed to do two surgeries a week. Then she went on to say that he would have gotten surgery sooner here in the USA, to which I replied that he also would have to pay for it. It's my usual retort to Canadians or Brits who have bought into the myth of our health system being superior and their being awful.

However, what is this meme of limiting surgeons to two surgeries a week? Is this a provincial thing. Said brother does live in Manitoba, which I understand is quite conservative. Is she right or is she just listening to some propaganda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Sounds like Bullshit to me...
I was talking to my Mom, who is an Oprah Winfrey fan, and of course watched the show, she also saw Sicko, and she mentioned that my grandpa had to wait almost a month for open heart surgery because the cardiologist was unavailable, this was in the mid 1980s, in the United States. So waiting lists wouldn't be unique to either Canada or Britain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I have never heard of such a thing so I really haven't an answer for you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. It's probably BS that her brother told her.
I'm going to call her on it and see if she'll find out the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Propaganda.
Besides, my surgeon had to fight with his insurance carrier for THREE YEARS to get his hip replacement. It seems that they didn't care about how much pain he was in, if he could bear weight, it wasn't necessary.

They are assholes. They need to go. A rational culture would have lined them up against the wall decades ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. In BC here and have not heard that in this Province... My sister just went...
thru hip surgery and is scheduled for the second hip in a mater of weeks... The Canadian health system is far from perfect, but it is one hell of allot better than what you have in the US... (which is basically nothing) I suppose if Harper stays in power for much longer though, we probably will be in jeopardy of loosing what we have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
36. I've been thinking about this and perhaps what it was is that her brother's doctor
only wanted to do two surgeries a week. That's the only thing I can think of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
41. A doctor only allowed two surgeries a week?
Where did they get that crap from? The orthopedic surgeon who replaced my wife's hip would be surprised to hear that. He does at least 15 surgeries a week.

Oh, and my wife's waiting time for the new hip? About four months. It would have been three months, only my wife wanted to finish off her school year (she's a teacher).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
47. My brother did Internal Medicine at Toronto Gen
My dad had heart surgery at Toronto Gen (They paid for it, as the dad of a House doc they allowed for it as long it was paid since my parents still live in Mexico)

The Cardio Thoracic surgeon did that surgery that day, five hour deal and had another one scheduled for the next day.

Not true...

The only reason my brother ended up at the Cleveland Clinic is that they recruited him after finishing his specialty.

He can tell you horror stories on both systems, they do happen... but in the US, at least in my view, they happen more often.

My brother has changed his view that there is more research done here... after the last seven years

He's a research doc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
61. whoa, someone told you a whopper
Manitoba ain't conservative. Its got a socialist government, and the people are the most left-wing on the continent. However, the few conservatives that are there rant louder than usual. My brother lives there; moved there from a right-to-work state (Mississippi) to Canada, partially because the job was better paying, partially because the health care was so much better. He says there are wait lists for non-essential services, but its because the Conservative national government won't fund medicare properly. The idea the Conservatives have is to starve medicare, then turn around and say "see, it doesn't work! We need the wonderful American system!", which, unfortunately, will happen as long as that Christian fundamentalist nut Harper remains as the national leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
62. Complete and utter bullshit.
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 04:17 PM by Evoman
If anything, specialists are overworked. They aren't limited to two surgeries a week, unless they want to be. If it was up to the province, the doctor would be on call 24/7.

And if he WAS limited to two hip surgeries a week, its probably because he has more important surgeries to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hang in there America. You'll get Universal Care like the rest of the civilized world! YOU DESERVE I
From your lips to God's ears... I sure hope my neighbors get decent health care, cause they do deserve it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. Thank you, eh? (Ex-Montanan).
And a recipient of some excellent ER care in your fair nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thank you so much! I love hearing of Canada's health care system from
one who truly knows! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alstephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. Thanks for the nice thoughts, glarius!
Unfortunately we don't have a choice and have to "hang in there". And yes, EVERYONE deserves decent health care. Thanks again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. You're more than welcome!
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
25. I've NEVER--not once--watched Oprah before. But hats off to her for
having a very reasoned and respectful debate on the issue. She POLITELY asked each guest to let the other finish and no shouting matches.

And how many people does she reach?

I think the tide may have made a BIG turn today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. I agree with you. Michael seemed more relaxed than usual and therefore
able to get his important points across. Usually, I get the feeling that he is sort of rushed because he knows the show he is on is really out to get him, and therefore doesn't explain himself properly, so he does a lot of joking. Today was different. He seemed to know he would get a fair shake from Oprah and he was great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. That's the kind of political debate I'd love to see more of.
Bring the issues to the people--Oprah is about as "average" as it can get, I imagine.

If it only expanded the dialog it was worth it--and on Oprah, I think the issue was put right out there no longer to be ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. She has a huge audience too......so lots of folks will see it!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
34. Also pointed out that we wait less because 50 million arent in line.
A point I never caught when thinking about the argument of wait times, of course its faster here, the line is allot shorter it has less poor people in it.

Dennis Kucinich, Non profit Medicare for all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. That was a GREAT point and should be part of every debate on the issue.
As Moore said, I'd, too, would be willing to wait if it meant my neighbor could get care too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piesRsquare Donating Member (960 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
39. Waiting times, my butt!
The wait times in this country can be just as bad--if not worse. The only difference is that OUR wait time is spent fighting with the insurance companies for approval of necessary treatment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #39
58. We have tip-top primo union insurance & my husband had to wait
SIX MONTHS to see an endocrinologist and FIVE months to get a freaking hearing test :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
40. It is all Nixons fault we have the 'health care system'...
if you want to call it that, we have. He should be dug up and burned for this treason.

Any country that works against UHC, is a facist/corperate loving pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
42. I just watched the rerun. The insurance shill lady is a liar.
She said we pay more but we have better outcomes. Uh, no we don't, not if you look at our overall health statistics. Yes, if you can pay you get excellent care in this country. However, for the population as a whole, our health indicators suck - highest infant mortality of any developed country in the world, huge disparities in chronic diseases, huge disparities in all cause mortality, etc etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
43. It was a great I especially liked it when Oprah yelled,"I can't wait for a bone marrow transplant."
"I don't have time to shop around if I need a transplant --I need it NOW. I'm sick. Don't make me shop around."

(Not the exact words -- but that was the gist of it.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
44. It was also great when that guy from Princeton said we shouldn't be called "consumers"
He said if we are referred to as "consumers" instead of "patients", then there is something wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. Professor Reinhardt was great.
He pointed out that "socialized medicine" is a scare word. Moore pointed out that we have socialized police and fire and utilities.

Moore's best lines:

1. To the insurance lobbyist: "I don't want ONE DOLLAR of my taxes to go to your profit!".

2. Saying that all major religions say you should take care of your less fortunate brother, that instead of "socialized medicine" we should call it "Christianized medicine" and he quoted from Jesus saying you should feed the hungry etc.

I've seen him use that term before, and it's a good sound bite.

3. He pointed out that soldiers have socialized medicine in the V.A. to take care of them.

4. Telling the lobbyist "You own those guys", referring to the Congresscritters.

The lobbyist woman kept babbling about "centers of excellence we send people to in Houston, at the Mayo Clinic, blah blah blah" totally avoiding the question.

When she said they paid 5 billion claims a year, Moore pointed out that with 300 million Americans, did that mean that the average American went to the doctor 20 times a year?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #44
63. To digress slightly: EVERY U.S. institution labels us "consumers".
The MOST egregious, IMO, is in education, where children are "products". Of course, superintendents LOVE to think of themselves as "CEO's", and want to be paid as if.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
46. I have insurance and it took me six months to
see the skin doctor... for a non life threatening mole.

That is average for Canada too

Read the above, non threatening.

Oh and my coverage is pretty good.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
48. Many Americans know that what you say is true. According to Harper's
Index, 51% of republicans want universal health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #48
55. That's why I can't stand the excuses why they won't pass single-payer.
It's there in the house, right now, with over 80 co-sponsors.

Which senator will stop sucking up to the industry and spouting their lies, and just introduce a matching bill already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
51. Michael Moore on Oprah (video)
I just posted this episode of the Oprah show in the DU video forum. Here's part 1 of 6 parts:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x58325
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
56. It will take time, but eventually the Republican talking points will be
chipped away and exposed as the pandering to the insurance industry that they are. I read a New Brunswick newspaper online in an area where we're thinking of moving to. There was a story about a little boy on an island in the Bay of Fundy who hadn't been feeling well and accompanied his mother on her doctor's appointment on the mainland. Turns out the little kid had a life-threatening condition and he was immediately transferred to a center that specialized in treatment of that particular illness - in Ontario, I think. He was treated for months and months, but finally recovered and was able to return to his home on the island. His family didn't lose their home. They didn't require bake sales to pay for his care. He had no appointment on the day he was diagnosed and not a second of waiting time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
57. ok, here's one statistic I don't get-
She said the insurance industry pays out 5 billion claims a year, only 3 percent are denied. Of those denied, 80 percent are denied because of experimental status. So, only 0.6 percent of claims are denied in the course of 'normal' medical procedures? If true, then why is there so much dissatisfaction?

I will say, she's got some guts, or the money drives the pangs of conscience far, far away. She's standing up in front of Americans and saying, basically, 'I'm the one pulling the plug on Grandma!'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
59. Adding to my original thread: this concerns manufacturers & health care.
One of the reasons businesses, like Toyota, for instance, locate in our country is because they don't have to worry about health care deals for their employees....I just this morning heard the woman on CNN who talks about business matters, saying that a big problem with Ford and General Motors is that it costs them a fortune for health care for their workers. You would have thought this would have lead the conversation to discussing universal health care, but of course they ignored the point all together.
Since saving or making money is of prime importance to manufacturers, this is something the American advocates for Universal health care should be emphasizing, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC