Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Attorney Talks About Lawsuit Against Bush, NSA Over Wiretaps

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 06:47 PM
Original message
Attorney Talks About Lawsuit Against Bush, NSA Over Wiretaps
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092707A.shtml

Attorney Talks About Lawsuit Against Bush, NSA Over Wiretaps


By Jason Leopold, t r u t h o u t

VIDEO at link~

Recently, I sat down with attorney Jon Eisenberg who sued George W. Bush, the National Security Administration (NSA), and other federal agencies, on behalf of two Washington DC-based lawyers who allege their telephone calls were illegally monitored by the NSA in March 2004.

The lawyers, Wendell Belew and Asim Ghafoor, appear to be the only American citizens who say they have hard evidence that proves the government spied on them.

Belew and Ghafoor had represented the Islamic charity Al-Haramain. The US Treasury Department accused the charity of funding al-Qaeda and in 2004 froze the organization's assets. During the exchange of documents between Belew and Ghafoor and the Treasury Department in August 2004, the lawyers were sent a top secret document Eisenberg claims is evidence the attorneys' phone calls with the Saudi director of Al-Haramain were monitored in violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which requires the US government to obtain a warrant from a special court in order to spy on American citizens.

The top secret document the Treasury Department said it inadvertently gave to Belew and Ghafoor has since been retrieved by FBI agents and is being held in a secure facility in San Francisco. By law, Eisenberg is prohibited from discussing the specific contents of the document because it remains classified.

As the case made its way through the courts, the government asserted the "state secrets" privilege. Justice Department attorneys argued the case should be dismissed on grounds that national security would be at risk if details of the government's warrantless surveillance activities against US citizens became public.

But an Oregon district court judge disagreed with the government's position and said the case could proceed. The government appealed the ruling and the case landed at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco last month.

In a wide-ranging interview, Eisenberg, one of the attorneys who represented Michael Schiavo several years ago in his battle with Congress and Florida Governor Jeb Bush to have his wife, Terri, removed from artificial life support, discussed the David vs. Goliath battle he has taken on and how it could lead to the unraveling of the Bush administration's warrantless spy program if the appeals court rules in favor of his clients.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC