Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House: No cover-up of Bush's flub

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 09:56 PM
Original message
White House: No cover-up of Bush's flub
Posted on Thu, Sep. 27, 2007

White House: No cover-up of Bush's flub
By BEN FELLER
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON --The White House has been setting the record a little too straight.

Anyone reading the official transcript of Bush's statement on education Wednesday would see that he said "children do learn."

Except that's not what he said.

Bush flubbed the line and said "childrens do learn" - a particularly embarrassing gaffe given that he was surrounded by young students and talking about the importance of education. It also harkened back to another infamous misstatement, when Bush rhetorically asked "Is our children learning?"

On Thursday, press secretary Dana Perino said the White House never meant to clean up Bush's language after the fact.


-snip-

Perino said no one in Bush's press operation had ordered the stenographers office to fix Bush's slip-up in the transcript.

She did, however, order that the transcript be amended later so that it would accurately include the president's mistake.

Sure enough, it now reads "childrens (sic) do learn."

Source: http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/politics/story/153187.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's the proper way to do it.
(sic)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yes, (sic)
(sic) (sic)

Although, only once will do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Would that DUH-bya did likewise. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yup. President (sic) Bush n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
O.M.B.inOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. LOL! Groucho would've been proud.
Marx/Dumont '08!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. How about Hackenbush/Upjohn instead?
The Upjohn part might succeed in hoodwinking Big Pharma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Wagstaff/Huxley
"I'm Professor Wagstaff of Huxley College."

"That means nothing to me."

"Well, it means nothing to me, either. I'll try it again: I'm Professor Huxley of Wagstaff College."

"Well, you didn't stay at the other college very long."






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. You got my vote.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomreedtoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. If it's good enough for Chef McElroy, it's good enough for Dubya!
I'm waiting for him to greet a group of children "you 'dorable li'l crackers."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piesRsquare Donating Member (960 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Children(s) do learn"
Wow. How profound. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. How could anyone in their right mind vote for George W. Bush for ANYTHING?
Edited on Thu Sep-27-07 10:37 PM by Bobbieo
It was the 2000 "Bushisms" that did it for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. And, he just had that realization, all by himself. NOT. Speechwriter found this gem!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is our Dana Perino full of shit?
Dana Perinos is full of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oh, bull. Is Mandela still dead? I wonder if THAT remained in the transcript? I also
noticed that that IDIOTIC remark wasn't all over the news that day OR the next. The Corporate whores just ignored it. At least I didn't see it anywhere, but I heard it played on every Air America show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. Since Bush took office, the stenographers have been editing the official transcript...
...ending decades of stenographers accurately recording what the president said.

That's not a coincidence.

It's part of the Bush Administration indifference to the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. Here's the clip
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-3FSUafZqk

He really does not care about education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. "White House never meant to clean up Bush's language."
She is such a freakin' liar.

It was done on purpose & changed when they got busted, as usual for the Busholini Regime.

Why is the Pres. still in office when it is a fact that he violated the FISA Law ( A Felony) 32 times?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC