Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Are People Saying That Kucinich Wants A Massive Gasoline Tax Increase?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 06:46 AM
Original message
Why Are People Saying That Kucinich Wants A Massive Gasoline Tax Increase?
Just the other night, I heard Dennis Kucinich express total opposition to a three dollar a gallon increase on the gasoline tax. He said that such a thing would be a very regressive tax, and the wrong thing for our country, and for our economy.

He said it would hurt the people that are most vulnerable.

I heard it with my own ears.

Yet people, right here on DU, keep saying he endorsed such a tax increase.

I'm having trouble finding this quote with Google. Or Google News.

But I swear to God, I heard it with my own two ears.

Can anyone with TV confirm that I haven't lost my mind?

I know Kucinich said he was against the gas tax increase. Yet people seem to want to spread the opposite.

And for the record, I've been an Edwards guy. I'm a poor lost soul that thinks Kucinich can't win.

Still, I wonder why people are lying about Dennis like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
5X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Operatives. n/t and k and r.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmatthan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. After the last debate


Every major Liberal Talk Show Host has said that Kucinich is the only real Democratic candidate.
This has caused Randi Rhodes in desperation to push for her favourite, Al Gore, because he kissed her and she cried!

Hilary has taken aboard Wesley Clark who said that the big problem in Iraq is that the Iranians are providing health care, power, water and even educating Iraqis in their universities. That to him is the BIG PROBLEM!

Clark stands for a permanent military presence in the Middle East and is pushing for the Hilary agenda of further war and military victory.

So also is Obama and Edwards.

Hence, Kucinich has to be demonised as he is only one on the same page as the American and world people.

So do not expect any good things to be heard about Kucinich in the main stream media.

This is my personal analysis as a non-American who has no personal interest in your elections!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. stop lying, Clark has been running http://www.stopiranwar.com/ for the past year
Sheesh..

Stop fucking lying here!

http://www.stopiranwar.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmatthan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Lying?
Listen to the sound of the Sam Seder on Sunday of last week

http://samsedershow.com/node/1337#comments

and I think you should then apologise publicly to me.

Listen to Clark say - "Decades of involvement".

Does not sound like an "Anti-War" platform!

Already over a million Iraqis dead!

Another few decades of that?

I have received all of Clark's emails.

He has two different takes on the war and his stand is to drum up the war beat against Iran.

And that is NOT a LIE!

Clark is NOT a Military Man any longer - he is just a politician.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. the establishment is scared shitless by this guy..
they will say and do anything to further marginalize him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazyriver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yup. Like crop him out of photos, dismiss their own polls
when he wins them, tell us he's too short, distract from his message by talking about his young wife, how unelectable he is, leave his name out of other polls as a choice, tell only half the story about his early experience as mayor of Cleveland and the scam he prevented by refusing to sell their public utilities...it's really sickening. If he manages to draw 10% in the polls, the smearing will get exponentially worse.

The media is owned by the corporate masters and those masters will not permit a candidate to win who threatens to bust up their little racket. They will select two candidates for us, one with a "D" after their name and one with an "R", but they will have one very important thing in common...they will be corporatist. I think it's that simple.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. They're the same ones who say SCHIP will cover illegal immigrants
they have been fed a load of ethanol from the ol' corn peddler Rush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. What is your solution?
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 01:00 PM by wuushew
There are only a few options

(A) higher CAFE standards

(B) higher gasoline taxes

(C) rationing

(C) do nothing, let the market decide(and fail)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. "I'm a poor lost soul that thinks Kucinich can't win."
Why do you allow propagandists' lies to influence you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. tell a lie often enough and it becomes a halftruth.
bush and rove. etc., have obviously successfully passed on this tidbit to 'the good guys'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. This isn't exactly what you're looking for, but Dennis chaired a committee
which examined "hot fuel," the discrepancy between what American consumers pay for gas in the summer and in the winter. Drivers get less mileage-per-gallon in the summer because they actually receive less gas during the higher temperatures. They adjust for this in Canada and DK wants to know why we aren't doing that here, since Americans are already paying so much for gas. Dennis's reply starts at 2:21 into the video... :hi:

"Hot Fuel" Hearing: Cummings & Kucinich Exchange
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkftukPu3Fs

His opening speech is here, though it's a lot longer...:-)

"Hot Fuel" Hearing: Kucinich's Opening
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trw1_nUIVcM&mode=related&search=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. Here are the videos in response to the thread in GD: Politics
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3556419&mesg_id=3557787


Videos, Kucinich said NO to $3.00 gas tax and 6 candidates said
YES to the national ban on smoking in public places.

Gas tax

Start at 2:25 on the below video re the $3.00 gas tax


penguin7 (438 posts) Fri Sep-28-07 12:44 AM
Response to Original message

21. This post is false
Kucinich answered no to the 3$/gas tax question.

I think a gas tax a good idea, but I also think Edwards house is bad for the environment so I am in the minority.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=tpG2CshQ7xU


Smoking ban


slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Fri Sep-28-07 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #21
36. THANK YOU & all other candidates said YES to smoking ban
except Clinton and Obama who said they would prefer to have local bans and see the outcome first.

Here's that video, start at 5:25.

Biden, Dodd, Richardson, Kucinich and Gravel all raised their hands in response to the question. When Russert was doing the second summary and moving on to the next question, Edwards wanted to join the other five.

NEW HAMPSHIRE DEMOCRATIC DEBATE SEPT 26, 2007 part 12
http://youtube.com/watch?v=gBwCUw60aZI



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's the best they can do without a "Dean scream" to hobble him with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. I heard him say that too! DK AGAINST THE TAX! hmmmf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. because their are shameless liars here n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. Someone posted it the other day but they were wrong. I watched...
the debate and his answer was simple...no!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. He not only said, "NO" to the gas tax,
Edited on Sat Sep-29-07 12:36 PM by LWolf
he also said something Democrats don't want to hear. Here's a transcript of the question and answer, the bolding mine:

<snip>

Would you be in favor of a phase-in $3.00 a gallon gasoline tax?

KUCINICH: No. And he said something else that didn't receive
much notice. He said that the Iraq war was about oil, something that
I said on "Meet the Press," Tim, on February 23rd, 2003.

I think that we need to make sure that the next president was
right about Iraq, was right about the Patriot Act.

You can have a president like that, who was right about Iraq, who
voted against it from the beginning and against the funding. You can
have a president against -- who was for a single-payer, not-for-profit
health care system, one who will stop the Patriot Act...



RUSSERT: Time.

KUCINICH: ... or you can have a president who's tall.

http://ipol-2008.blogspot.com/2007/09/transcript-of-dartmouth-debate.html

There are many Democrats who don't want a president who's right; they want Washington to be a choreographed theater that will put them in the "VIP" box in the audience, without looking at what goes on behind the curtain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. You heard correctly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
18. The OP of the original thread already apologized several times,
having stated that he misheard Dennis's answer. I was half-listening to the debate at that point and thought I heard the same, and replied favorably to the OP ; I, too, have both apologized and K-and-R'd threads attempting to correct the untruth.

Anyone else who's repeated that got it from that thread, and didn't see the OP's later correction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC