Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Couric: ‘Not My Job’ To Critically Report On Iraq, ‘Unless Something Is Really Egregious’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:13 PM
Original message
Couric: ‘Not My Job’ To Critically Report On Iraq, ‘Unless Something Is Really Egregious’
Couric: ‘Not My Job’ To Critically Report On Iraq, ‘Unless Something Is Really Egregious’

Recently, CBS anchor Katie Couric traveled to the Middle East for a “heavily promoted week in the war zone,” reporting the situation on the ground from Iraq. Her reporting was superficial and uncritical, airing several “puff pieces” mouthing Bush administration talking points.

This week, Couric spoke at the National Press Club with host Marvin Kalb to discuss “Democracy and the Press.” Couric explained that her goal in Iraq was to appear neutral and avoid “a Walter Cronkite moment,” as she put it:

Is it my job to go over and say this war is terrible and withdrawal is necessary? I don’t necessarily think that is the case. … I don’t necessarily feel that (I should pass judgment) unless there is a clear cut factual element to it. … I have never really saw it as my role, unless something is really egregious and without question wrong.

more at:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. She is afraid of a Walter Cronkite moment?
Well, that pretty much sums up the state of network news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. "And that's the way it may or may not be, but who am I to decide?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. see the Dan Rather lawsuit
She likes her job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow.
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. There is no danger whatsoever of her having a walter cronkite moment....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wrong Katie, that's what the PR dept does. Idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. She was never a journalist or a reporter. She's a corporate hack
Katie you disgust me. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
38. She's a BFEE whore. No less. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #38
47. yeah, her sister Emily, a VA Dem is rolling in her grave n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Egregious" must be Katie's favorite word. She used it while critizing Dan Rather yesterday too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Better to have a Joseph Goebbels moment
cuz that's what you did Katie dear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Done Donating Member (680 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. "unless something is really egregious and without question wrong"
What do you call invading another country and KILLING a million people?

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
31. Here's one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. Losing the war isn't egregious?
The presence of a mercenary army with no oversight and no governing laws isn't egregious?

The butchery of Iraq to fatten a few corporations isn't egregious?

American kids coming home daily in pieces or in boxes isn't egregious?

Katie fucking Couric trying to pass herself off as a newscaster is egregious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Pretty disgusting that she thinks she is even in the same league as Cronkite.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. I have never really SAW it?
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 02:20 PM by Fridays Child
She's dangerous AND stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. Couric, I'm not interested in the news.
and that concept of 'investigative reporting' its so 1970s......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Gees, CBS News sure has fallen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. Made up Couric quotes -
I can tell if its newsworthy by measuring it on the egregious scale. If its not in the red, people don't need to know about it.

I like my news obvious. If you have to work to find it...its not newsworthy.

My ideal of the role of news reporting under democracy is, if its not egregious the citizens don't need to know.

As an newsperson and American citizen, I believe that an ignorant citizenry if the best choice for democracy in the USA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. She is not even in the same league as Cronkite, or even Scieffer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. And Nothing Has Ever Been "Egregious" About Iraq
Couric: "I don’t necessarily feel that (I should pass judgment) unless there is a clear cut factual element to it. … I have never really saw it as my role, unless something is really egregious and without question wrong."


And nothing has ever been wrong about Iraq ever. It's been a smooth operation from day one.


:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. The entire fuggign invasion and occupation are
really egregious and without question wrong. Fuck off Katie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scorpiogirl Donating Member (662 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. WTF is your job then?
Oh, wait, I know! It's making money for corporate media. You think that MIGHT be why she's not questioning shit? What a fucking chickenshit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Damn you stole my header!
So by her definition she is not a journalist only a mouthpiece. I guess she should get kudos for at least letting everyone know she is worthless. If they didn't already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scorpiogirl Donating Member (662 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
49. Sorry about that! :-)
I wonder how that bit of info will affect her ratings? She is an idiot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
41. I share your outrage but must note that corporate media exist
only to make money for shareholders. In that sense, corporate news exists only to attract viewers in order to sell ads and not to serve any public interest (despite what they may tell themselves or us). Depending on corporate media for anything other than "fill" before the next commercial break is a fool's errand, I would wager.

If you have access to a local Pacifica radio station, I suggest you avail yourself of it. Our local Pacifica station is KPFK (90.7 FM). I alternate between KPFK and Air America radio (Randi Rhodes and Rachel Maddow mainly) now and no longer watch network TV news nor read the LA Times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scorpiogirl Donating Member (662 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #41
55. I am more than aware of that. I was being tongue-in-cheek.
I watch very little tv these days and am sick to death of commercials or whoever trying to get me to consume something. I never, ever watch local news anymore. These people have zero credibility. I always wonder how putting on a suit and coiffing one's hair makes one respectable and credible, especially after hearing the shit they spew. Don't worry about me, I read a lot and know what's going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. avoid a "Walter Cronkite moment"!! You mean you aren't a journalist who tells the truth
as you see it, but must be a cheerleader for the war effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastLiberal in PalmSprings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
57. She probably wants to avoid an "Edward R. Murrow moment", too
God forbid she would stand up and tell the truth about a politician who is abusing his power to destroy innocent lives.

Katie is living in a perpetual Paris Hilton moment: all fluff and no substance (but a ton of money!).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. well then whats the point of reporting?
Just replace Couric with an industrial robot that can read teleprompters. It would be as enlightening as she is, and a lot cheaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. LOL 50 bazillion dollars cheaper!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. I think that's Brazillion... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Don't worry, it's coming. Remember Max Headroom?
We have the technology right now, it is just a matter of accelerating the rendering and synchronization process so that they can meet daily deadlines.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zandor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. As a network anchor, she has a point
She is terrible as any type of news person, but she probably shouldn't be passing opinions on the war while she's an anchor, and certainly shouldn't incorporate them into her reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
48. Then she needs to stay behind her desk and not make trips to Iraq
Thats what journalists do. They GO. Newsreaders sit. And avoid being like Cronkite. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. Please, people. Give the poor woman a break.
Can you even begin to imagine how difficult it must be to remain perky after 50?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
23. If the Iraw War isn't "egregious" then nothing is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
25. As an interesting side note
The viewers appear to be avoiding her as she avoids a Walter Cronkite moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
27. Nobody will confuse you with Cronkite, hon. HE RAWKED at his job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
30. Uh, whoever wrote that headline was massively off.
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 02:32 PM by Kagemusha
She used the words, "say this war is terrible and withdrawal is necessary". Where does anyone get "to critically report" out of that!!?? That's not what critical reporting means!!

That's advocacy, editorializing, i.e. the sort of thing Olbermann does all the time, because that's HIS job. I am startled and outraged at the idea that critical reporting means propagating political conclusions about foreign policy. Critical reporting certainly can include "the war is terrible"; the "and withdrawal is necessary" part is problematic.

Critical reporting means criticizing things like the manipulation of facts and excess happy talk. Therefore, she in no way said it's not her job to critically report on Iraq, either in those words, or in the full context of her actual words.

(Edit: ...Which in no way means that I accept the idea that she IS doing critical reporting on Iraq, but that is, as they say, another story.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
33. Katie Couric: The Definition Of Shallow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheUniverse Donating Member (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
35. Well I guess its "not my Job" to watch your crappy program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #35
53. You are exactly right. We need a media boycott of crap 'n pap courics. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
36. And there's nothing egregious about the Iraq war?
Barring these facts:

That there's over two million Iraqi refugees living in other countries. Another two million Iraqi people displaced within Iraq. Another 1 million Iraqi people dead.

That there were no WMD's and that the WH knew that fact but chose to push on with their war. Which makes the entire premise for the war illegal.

That an entire countries infrastructure has been demolished.

Does she mean other than that there's nothing egregious about the war?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
37. Is it her job to report?
If the situation is a disaster, it is, indeed, her job to report it. I guess that's why they need reporters reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
39. "...really egregious and without question wrong"??
That settles it. She is a bimbo.

Give her back her cheerleader outfit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
40. Call me crazy, but the current concept of "objectivity" is highly over-rated these days.
Imagine Mark Twain being "objective" about slavery, for instance.

I would prefer to have opposing SUBJECTIVE reporters who told you where they stand and backed it up with facts that they investigate- instead of this non-opinion, non-news, nothingness that passes for "journalism" these days...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allisonthegreat Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
43. is she taking payments from the White House
Geez come on girl...Let's here some real journalism. If you are capable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
44. "Navy Seals RAWK!!"...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
45. LEAVE KATIE ALONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
46. What does the CBS eye represent? The damn thing should be closed for Katie's sake!
Maybe they should change their logo to some Zzzzs to represent sleeping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
50. What I find truly bizarre
is that here we see a network news anchor being called out for shoddy reporting (i.e. the "nine questions" Kalb mentions). Let's forget for the moment that she has no defense for this; the fact that that a network news anchor's journalism skills are being questioned by one who truly knows something about reporting (no less than Edward R. Murrow recruited Kalb to CBS) says more about Couric and CBS News — if not TV news in general — than anything else I can think of.

You'd think that by the time someone becomes the anchor at one of the "Big Three," it would be they who are the teachers. But here we see Kalb taking Couric to school, and she doesn't even seem to think the lesson is warranted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
51. What a piece of fluff ! Issue some HB1 visas for Jounalists-we have a desperate shortage.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
52. Because she is not a real journalist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
54. WTF-And she calls herself a journalist?
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. Her "job" & Dana Perino's are interchangeable.
They could switch places & it would be hard to tell the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
59. What a vapid little twit she is...
...and I guess she'll wait for Bush and his minions to inform her if something is "egregious" in Iraq. Heaven forfend she might do -- gasp -- any RESEARCH on the story she is covering.

No, per Katie, the Iraq occupation is nothing more than a "human interest" story, about people caught in the unavoidable natural disaster that happened in Iraq. Good thing the Americans are there to save the day!

Billions unaccounted for, planeloads of unmarked bills distributed without any accounting, huge munitions stores unguarded and allowed to fall into the hands of our enemies there, thousands of armed men put out of work, infrastructure that continues to worsen, mercenaries who fire upon civilians at will and without accountability, blatant corruption by our contractors there, soldiers going without proper protection -- but hey, none of that is "egregious" enough for Ms. Perky.

I truly despise Katie "Navy Seals Rawk!" Couric, and hope karma comes along and gives her the tremendous ass-kicking she deserves. Preferably on camera.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC