Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Removes Lawyers Because Of Their Support For The Jena 6

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:42 PM
Original message
Judge Removes Lawyers Because Of Their Support For The Jena 6
This morning when black lawyers went into the courtroom of judge Ann Pugh with a lapel pin on in the shape of a six,showing their support for the Jena 6 they were told by the judge to remove the lapel pins or get out of her court.

All the black lawyers wearing the pin refused the request of the judge and reset their cases until another day. The lawyers wondered why the judge would tell them that the pin was a distraction, and that the pin represented a pendingcase.

One of the lawyers who refused to remove him pin is attorney T. Flowers who felt that the act by the judge was wrong and racist. Flowers also states that their is no provisions that gives the judge the right to tell an attorney that a lapel pin can not be worn.

Later in the day after probadly hearing that the black lawyers were preparing to sue, Judge Pugh reversed her ruling allowing the lawyers to wear and conduct business in her courtroom. Flowers will be my guest tonight on "Express Yourself" as we take a grapic look at racism in Memphis. The program airs from 6-7pm on Am 990 KWAM.

http://thadmatthews.blogspot.com/2007/09/judge-ann-pugh-removes-lawyers-because.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. white Southerners sure go out of their way
to convince everyone how racist they are. Geez, what a putz of a judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. And we're ALREADY convinced. ROFL!!! They do it simply because they like it.
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 02:57 PM by BlooInBloo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good for them, getting the judge to back down
This was in Tennessee?

Some pathetic anonymous comments on the blog in your link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. I agree with the judge.
Attorneys are officers of the court. They should not be wearing anything that promotes any social, political, or legal agenda. Attorneys are officers of the court, and should not be wearing lapel pins, babies' feet pins, black armbands, or Grateful Dead t-shirts in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. even an "Al Haig Rocks" tee shirt?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. No.
Al Haid sweatshirts should be mandatory -- as punishment, of course. Likely "unconstitutional," but we have ways of making people talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I agree that the third season got off track.
Regardless of how much racism we think has transpired, attorneys are officers of the court, not protesters. Furthermore, no one should be influenced by anything worn in court, since decisions are supposed to be based on fact, not on how many thousands of supporters - or NO supporters - show up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. You mean you agree with the judge before the judge reversed the decision?
Yeesh. Apparently the judge doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. what about
wearing a "skin head" haircut?
or
a crucifix?
or
a tattoo?
or
a military uniform?
or
a masonic ring?
or
a Claddagh?
or
a peace sign?
or
an american flag?
or
birkenstocks?
or
a Yamika?
or
a kilt?
or
a payos?
or
a bindi?
.....????????????????????????????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. Shades of My Cousin Vinney
"And the next time you come into my courtroom, you will be wearing cloth, do you understand me?"

"Yeah, yeah, yeah..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC