Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why do you effing iced tea drinkers always take Limbaugh and O'Reilly out of context?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 05:38 PM
Original message
Why do you effing iced tea drinkers always take Limbaugh and O'Reilly out of context?
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 05:48 PM by BuyingThyme
I’ve been surfing around AM radio today, hearing all about the latest Bill O’Reilly and Rush Limbaugh flaps. It seems that they’ve become victims of people (like you) who dared to take their words out of context. I figure I should defend these patriots by adding a little context. Limbaugh first:

In his defense, Rush today explained that when he used the phrase “phony soldiers,” he was only referring to one phony soldier. That, of course, may or not be the case; you can’t really tell from the context of the broadcast in question. Luckily, Rush added some context today. He said that there were “others” (other phony soldiers). Among the other phony soldiers, Rush specifically identified one John Murtha.

So, in context, Rush believes it’s fine and dandy to attack the patriotism and military service of people like John Murtha, but has a completely different standard for people like David Petraeus. All we need to do now is figure out how one soldier’s service differs so greatly from the other. Wikis for your reference:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petraeus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_murtha

Now as for Bill, this is an easy one. Bill and his supporters claim that you folks and the fine people at Media Matters “distorted” his words to make him look like a racist – like the kind of guy who might support some kind of white power structure. Well, that may or may not be the case, as it’s hard to tell without context. Luckily, Bill clarified his position a few months ago. He came right out and explained that, “They want to breakdown the white Christian male power structure of which you are a part, and so am I.” He made this point twice, via two different media. It was apparently a part of his notes. The context is pretty solid:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,276732,00.html

So, to understand what he was saying in regards to the restaurant Bill recently visited in Harlem, we must consider the context. The words came from a self-professed white supremacist.

I hope this clears things up. We have to put these things in context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. I see I see....How could I have thought such things
But now with that fine explanation it is all too clear to me that i was wrong to think that they were just a bunch of bigoted fools.

Note to self;
Must writ to them and apologize and give them my suport....
NOT
:sarcasm:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am not an effing iced tea drinker.
But I do demand a MF-ing iced tea now and then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Besides drinking iced tea, I'm also a "maggot infested, pot smoking ,

long haired............" Thankfully, no one has noticed except Ol' Rush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. because those mofo's hate it when the shoe is on the other foot. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Excellent.
Yes! Those two have made their "context" clear for years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC