Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just What We Need! A Candidate Who Will "bring strong spiritual values into the White House"!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 05:41 PM
Original message
Just What We Need! A Candidate Who Will "bring strong spiritual values into the White House"!
And JUST in the nick of time! Because if there's one thing we need MORE of in government, it's SPIRITUAL VALUES.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/08/21/usnews/whispers/main3191148.shtml


(US News) During yesterday's Democratic presidential candidate debate, the most interesting exchange, in this observer's opinion, came in the form of responses to a question on religion. The man who posed the question, Seth Ford of South Jordan, Utah, e-mailed: "My question is to understand each candidates' view of a personal God. Do they believe that, through the power of prayer, disasters like Hurricane Katrina or the Minnesota bridge collapse could have been prevented or lessened?"
...
KUCINICH: "Now, the founders meant to have separation of church and state, but they never meant America to be separate from spiritual values. As president, I'll bring strong spiritual values into the White House..."


Bye, Moonbeam McCrazypants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. yeah your hilarious
whos crazier? the guy who thinks of religion in non concrete terms? like a form of positive energy that can be used for positive uses? or the guy who "god" personally talks to and gives him "mandates" in the form of war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It's like asking me which Oompa Loompa is shorter. I'm certain there's one correct answer...
... But I'll be damned if my eyes are sharp enough to tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LearnedHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. DUzy!!! OMIGOD, that's the funniest thing I've read all day!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Glad somebody liked it. They pick oddball posts of mine for DUzys these days though. :( ...
... Oh well - it's better than not getting them at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. I'm with Kucinich ..I don't do
Edited on Sat Sep-29-07 06:07 PM by zidzi
Fucking Dogma..Dennis is right.. "KUCINICH: "Now, the founders meant to have separation of church and state, but they never meant America to be separate from spiritual values. As president, I'll bring strong spiritual values into the White House..."

There's a 180 degree difference between listening to WAR being preached from the pulpit and recognizing the Spirit in us all that makes us want to be kind and helpful to others as well as ourselves.

I like it that Dennis isn't talking about "God, Religion, and Jesus" like so many fakes are..Yeah, they'll talk about Jesus, Prince Of Peace and vote to give the monkeysquad to go ahead to kill innocent people.

Fucking bobbing heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's an irrelevant, stupid question and shouldn't have been asked. Stop pandering
to the religious right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe Kucinich understands the difference
between religion and spirituality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't want EITHER being a significant component of how I'm governed...
... People of course differ on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Agreed eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
38. Actually, what you have now
is a profound lack of spirituality in the white house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. peace and love are spiritual values. Are you in favor of peace and love? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. There is zero chance
of having any serious candidate in the democratic primaries who is not going to speak about religious/spiritual values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. We do need spiritual values in the White House,
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 06:45 PM by Raksha
as long as the are Dennis Kuchinich's brand of spiritual values, which just HAPPEN to be mine too! I have never seen anything the least bit spiritual about what the Robertson/Dobson crowd claims are "spiritual values."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sad, how * has damaged even this basic part of life for so many
Americans. Now, even the broad term, "spiritual values," is tainted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. What is a "strong spiritual value" anyway?
Haunting creepy houses?

Anyway, I'm still voting for him over any of the other lumps running unless and until Gore runs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Spiritual value: Crown Royal on sale.
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDenton Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. I bet alot of people prayed they wouldn't get hit
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 08:12 PM by PDenton
by Katrina. The theology of Paul Tillich and the suffering God would probably be alien to most of these people. No, they want to believe in the shaman God who blesses the righteous and smites the wicked. Good things happening to bad people don't make any sense in their theology, unless the people were secretly wicked. Even Jesus warned about this kind of thinking, when the apostles asked them if a city that was destroyed was especially wicked. His answer was "no" and that God " makes the rain fall on the just and unjust".

Just shows you most Americans understanding of spirituality. "Personal God"... being from Utah of course he means the God and Mrs. God, the fleshly alien beings up living in Kolob (a star in Mormonism), no doubt. Or something like that. Most people don't understand that "person" in the theological sense doesn't mean "personal" in the everyday sense, I guess. To most Americans "personal" God means like George Bush, you've got a hotwire to revelation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. I agree. It would be wonderful to have someone with strong spiritual values in the WH!
Religion mostly sucks, but I'm all for spiritual values. Thank you for posting this, it just makes me appreciate Dennnis Kucinich all the more.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rwalsh Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. President Carter
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 08:36 PM by Rwalsh
had strong spiritual values. . . is he a moonbeam,too has strong spiritual values.

So I guess you consider him a "moonbeam", too. You won't find a lot of people who agree with you. Including me.

Edited for elaboration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. At least Kucinich isn't hobnobbing with the rich, crazy and religious right, unlike Hillary
"Through all of her years in Washington, Clinton has been an active participant in conservative Bible study and prayer circles that are part of a secretive Capitol Hill group known as the Fellowship. Her collaborations with right-wingers such as Senator Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) and former Senator Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) grow in part from that connection." <http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2007/09/hillarys-prayer.html>

Hmm, Kucinich who wants separation of church and state, or Hillary, who's actively working with those who want a theocracy. Who to choose, who to choose:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Theocracy=autocracy=
Fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. Oh...I thought this would be about Hillary and her prayer group.
I'm guessing her religion is ok with you.

Bye,hypocritical DUer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. No, I don't think that B in B wants to touch that one for some reason
Really a shame, I was looking forward to the excuses and accusations of bias against an award winning magazine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Oh - I didn't hear she was gonna make a cabinet-level position out of her prayer group...
... Thanks for the update.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Doesn't have to make it a cabinet level position,
Just listen to those fine folks like Santorum and Brownback, whispering in her ear. Is this really what you want? Dedicated theocrats advising a president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Of course not. Then again, I don't buy the premise...
Edited on Sat Sep-29-07 06:53 PM by BlooInBloo
... That Clinton has Santorum (not a Senator) and Brownback as advisers.

EDIT: And I don't really care, in any case, because Clinton is my 3rd or 4th choice already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Then I would suggest that you read the MoJo article I linked to upthread. n/t
Edited on Sat Sep-29-07 07:00 PM by MadHound
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. So if you don't care because Hillary is your third or fourth pick...
why go after Kucinich who I'm sure is even lower than that on your list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Just to poke fun at Moonbeam McCrazypants lovers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. About what I thought.
Edited on Sat Sep-29-07 07:08 PM by Forkboy
Just trolling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. John Ashcroft didn't make it a cabinet level position either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Since Ashcroft didn't have the ability to make cabinet-level appointments, that's not surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. It doesn't have to be a cabinet level for it to be dangerous.

I'm sure you're smart enough to get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. At no point did I say, suggest, or imply otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlowDownFast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
22. Moonbeam McCrazypants.

:rofl:

You're terrible...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
27. As a person with similar spiritual beliefs as DK. I find your OP offensive. Do you
make fun of other's beliefs too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. Trying to swing some of the religious voters his direction..
However: "NO PREACHERS FOR PRESIDENT."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zandor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. Kucinich is Catholic
Would that be a blow to his followers that thinks he's 'just spiritual'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Oh, well yes it would..
I guess I miss read the OP...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larry Ogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
37. You don’t have to be religious to treat other people the way you would like to be treated,
or tell the truth, but some would consider these to be spiritual values.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
41. I don't get it.
What's the outrage or antipathy from? He just said a generic 'spiritual values'. While emphasizing separation of church and state. Lots of people make decisions informed by their faith and still act in accordance with the law. Everyone has some kind of values they incorporate. Some are just more overtly religious. This is coming from someone with an overall skepticism to religion.

If anything, Mike Gravel is your moonbeam:

GRAVEL: "What I believe in is love. And love implements courage. And courage permits us all to apply the virtues that are important in life."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC