Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AGRA's 'green revolution' biotechnology thrust is wrong headed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 05:48 PM
Original message
AGRA's 'green revolution' biotechnology thrust is wrong headed
original-pambazuka

Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa – a blunt philanthropic arrow

Nnimmo Bassey (2007-09-27)

Rather than proposing techno-fixes to problems of agricultural development in Africa, donors could better assist in the development of rural infrastructure such as roads and water supplies, and education to empower the younger generation in the study of useful science. African farmers, along with peasants around the world, are seeking respect for their right to decide on what to plant and how to plant it, as well what to eat and how.


It is a common saying that when a man has a hammer in his hand every problem appears to be a nail. It takes a wise man to know that a hammer is just one of the tools in the craftsman’s box. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation made money from technology. It is understandable that they should think that problems can always be solved with a technological fix. Nor is it surprising that the Rockefeller and Gates Foundations should plan to jointly plough $150,000,000 into their so-called Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA). Tragically, the biotech solutions proposed by AGRA are likely to deepen rather than solve problems of hunger, poverty and malnutrition in Africa.

The Gates Foundation has recently taken on scientists from the biotech industry. It is expected to fund projects in areas such as biotechnology to improve seeds and crop yields; fertilizer, irrigation and other farm management systems; access to markets; and advocacy for improved agricultural policies. They may claim otherwise, but the idea of AGRA is anchored around agricultural modern biotechnology or genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Yet, genetically modified crops, on the admission of the US Department of Agriculture, do not give better yields than conventional crops. In addition, the plan’s entire framework would turn African farm practices on their heads, wiping out local knowledge and creating more poverty, hunger and strange new diseases.

~snip~
.
.
.
complete article here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. tools for fighting AGRA
Inter Pares is doing great work with African farmers to make sure their traditional knowledge isn't lost and that AGRA does what African farmers want/need instead of Big AgriCorp.

Look for your local farmers union. I, personally, have joined the National Farmers Union even though I live in a city. So when politicians ignore the rural vote, they can't ignore the NFU 'cause city people belong to it.

Google the Ban Terminator campaign. These guys are looking for the global moratorium on terminator technology to become permanent. They also need city people to understand the importance of protecting a farmer's right to save seed.

Google Food Sovereignty. So Much to learn! And it thrills the soul to see it all happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. This absolutely defies common sense.
Instead of making new crops, going back to old crops that thrived in the area before we started to screw up the food chain would be a much better idea.

We don't know what the hell we're doing with genetically modified crops. We don't know what effect these things will have on the people involved, let alone the environment. Since we don't, the crops that have grown in the area in harmony with nature are a much better idea, no?

Until we know, for absolute certain sure, what we're doing playing around with the gene pool, we shouldn't attempt to let the products of our experiments loose.

These things can be harmful; I, for instance, cannot eat genetically modified corn. It screws up my blood sugar and leaves me nauseous, which means there are a lot of things I can't eat.

It's not a wise or sustainable move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC