Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Right-Wing New York Sun Declares: ‘Attack On Iran Said To Be Imminent’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 06:18 PM
Original message
Right-Wing New York Sun Declares: ‘Attack On Iran Said To Be Imminent’
Right-Wing New York Sun Declares: ‘Attack On Iran Said To Be Imminent’
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/28/iran-sanctions-prophecy/

Attack on Iran Said To Be Imminent
By BENNY AVNI
Staff Reporter of the Sun
September 28, 2007

UNITED NATIONS — In a sign that U.N. Security Council-based diplomacy is losing steam, a number of sources are reporting that a military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities may be imminent. France and America also are pushing for tighter economic sanctions against Tehran, without U.N. approval.

Yesterday's edition of Le Canard Enchaîné, a French weekly known for its investigative journalism, reported details of an alleged Israeli-American plan to attack Iran's nuclear facilities. The frontpage headline read: "A report sent to the Elysée — Putin tells Tehran: They're going to bomb you!"

The Saudi foreign minister, Prince Saud al-Faisal, also expressed concerns to reporters in New York that an attack on Iran might be imminent.

Like most stories in the French paper, the article was based on unnamed sources who said that in order to reduce casualties, the attack against Iran is planned for October 15, the end of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan. Israel would bomb the first targets while America would orchestrate a second wave of strikes, the report said.

more at:
http://www.nysun.com/article/63561
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. There were people on this board assuring us that war with Iran would come in June, 2005
And now, the goalposts have been moved back to October 15, 2007.

Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Seems to match Cheney's master plan as reported in Newsweek.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=3002775

Have the Israelis strike first and wait for an Iranian military response. Then use the Iranian counter-strike as a pretext for American bombing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. What a propaganda tool. Ignore this and pay attention to IRAQ!
Don't fall for this crap. Keep your eye on the issue, IRAQ!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I'm Not Ignoring Iraq,
but we need to be careful not to let the NeoCons unleash yet another War on Iran
because it will make the occupation of Iraq worse. ALL War should be stopped!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think this helps explain why Edwards, Obama and Clinton were
so depressing with their deployment time frames.....they need to keep forces in Iraq to hold the region (HA) after, long after, the U.S. bombs Iran......and probably Syria. Could it be they learned through their sources that the attack is imminent thus, what I would call, the turn around on re-deployment?

Tonight on Hardball Mario Cuomo (sp?) was Chris' guest and he adamantly said the president does not have the right to go to war without Congress' approval...on Constitutional grounds. He was very fired up and said Congress needs to make this clear, since the president obviously thinks otherwise, to the president and inform him that discussion must take place between the two branches of gov't. before anymore attacks. When is it going to end?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. New York Scum, like the eggboy Matt Drudge, is notoriously fact-challenged
Not to be trusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarface2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. i say we lose may 10..
20 million tops!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC