Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Military Contractors: ‘Can’t Win With ‘Em, Can’t Go to War Without ‘Em’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 12:23 PM
Original message
Military Contractors: ‘Can’t Win With ‘Em, Can’t Go to War Without ‘Em’
‘Can’t Win With ‘Em, Can’t Go to War Without ‘Em’: Six Questions for P.W. Singer
BY Scott Horton - Sep 30, 2007
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/09/hbc-90001311

Peter Warren Singer is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, widely viewed as Washington’s premier think tank. He has been writing about military contractors and particularly the transformational role of security contractors in U.S. military strategy long before this topic became vogue. Indeed, among the small library of books this subject has engendered, his ‘Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry’ has emerged as the go-to work. Singer’s writing has been nuanced and detached—respecting the innovations, the flexibility and the accomplishments of this new industry while at the same time carefully cataloguing its problems. But a couple of days ago, Singer released a new Brookings report entitled “Can’t Win With ‘Em, Can’t Go to War Without ‘Em: Private Military Contractors and Counterinsurgency.”(PDF http://www3.brookings.edu/fp/research/singer200709.pdf). It adopts a far more critical posture towards security contractors, concluding that they are actually undermining the American military’s achievement of its declared objectives in a counterinsurgency operation in Iraq. I put six questions to Singer based on his new paper.

..................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is old hat. Machiavelli wrote somewhat disparagingly of mercenaries back in his day.
They are only accountable to the money given to them, not to any policy objectives that the rulers may have in mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verse18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nice cartoon I saw in our left wing local paper this week
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And, give them large piles of taxpayer money too! Then we understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC