I'm not a political science major, so please excuse my lack of understanding the nuances of what I'm asking. At a brokered Convention, which historically is a very rare occurrence, deals are "brokered" to release delegates from their commitment to a particular person. Per wiki:
The last attempt to release delegates from their candidates came in 1980, when Senator Ted Kennedy sought the votes of delegates held by incumbent Democrat Jimmy Carter. The last major party convention whose outcome was in doubt was the 1976 Republican National Convention, when former California Governor Ronald Reagan nearly won the nomination away from the incumbent, Gerald Ford.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_nominating_conventionSo lets say Al Gore makes a shocking late entry into the race, even after some of the Primaries. I do believe that the resulting tidal wave of financial support, volunteer commitments, and bumper sticker replacement orders would be unprecedented in American politics. Al is the ONLY candidate I would exchange my vote for DK with. I'd speculate there would be lots of folks switching alliances if Al made a late entry. This could create all sorts of chaos at the convention; or then again, one could say all sorts of wonderful possibilities. Guess that is a matter of perspective.
I hold out very little hope that Al will jump in at all; but I will admit to signing the petition at
http://draftgore.com/ QUESTION: Is a brokered Dem Convention a political pipe dream, or is it a possibility? :shrug: