Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What will become of the Blackwater Army when Dems take control of the White House?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:05 AM
Original message
What will become of the Blackwater Army when Dems take control of the White House?
Obviously, given Waxman's hearings, there have been a number of threads about Blackwater. I can't find one asking this question:

When (if) the Democrats take control of the White House on January 20th, 2009, what will become of Blackwater? Obviously, his history shows that Erik Prince was not much until the Iraq War fattened him up quite nicely. The Feds are his only substantial customer. Without those fat federal contracts, he'd go back to being a right wing nutter, a religious nutter, and a dangerous thug ....... but no longer the world's richest and most powerful general.

Will the Dems support him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. The same thing that happened when Dems took control of Congress. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yup
Zilch change. Especially considering the "inevitable" outcome of the primaries.

Wouldn't want to upset the "moderates" by persecuting the mercenary "patriots" or so it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLib at work Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. They will march thru the gates of hell back to where they came from..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hard to say if you go on what the dems have been doing so far. They
don't seem to be doing anything much different than the republicans.

Americans are against the war but now you have the dems in control of congress and they keep going along with funding the war which in turn funds Blackwater.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good question, what we've been TOLD for many years..
is that Blackwater and Halliburton are the ONLY companies who can effectively do the work that they do. I find this rather hard to believe, given the potential money involved.

I suspect tha if and hopefully when the Dems are back in power, other companies, in theory not so cozy with the repubs, will magically appear that will be able to bid on this kind of work, either that, or the Dems will federalize it, which is probably the best answer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I also would hope that "if" & "when" the dems get control of the WH and
congress, they would really tear into the contracts given Halliburton and Blackwater and if anything substantive was found, would then hit them hard and heavy with fines. I would not care if those two companies were driven into bankruptcy. Also, would really be interested to see how Bush & Cheney's companies were given the contracts and how those are the only two companies able to do Bush & Cheney's work on the backs of the taxpayer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. Depends which Democrat is sworn in.
Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 08:20 AM by AtomicKitten
Even China has invested in Blackwater. I am afraid some might find something warm and fuzzy about this out-of-control corporation and keep them around to, um, enforce the now expanded presidential powers.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. Give em a raise and hire more given whats happened since the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. At the present rate, nothing
Remember, the Iraq war was primarily a giant make-work project for the rich.

To eliminate the jobs that are primarily done by contractors would take a herculean effort. Besides, those contracts will take billions to cancel out. There are probably built-in "poison pills" in case of just such an attempt.

Contractors are there to stay. About the only thing that can be done is to *try* to impose some rules of engagement and financial responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mumon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. One word: Pirates.
Regardless of when it happens, at some point, Blackwater will become irrelevant, burdensome, and must be pushed under the bus whether it's done by Repubs or democrats. Then, like Japan's ronin morphing into the yakuza or the privateers morphing into pirates, or the Sicilian protection groups & vigilantes morphing into the mafia, you'll have a whole new band of splintered organized crime organizations springing from the carcass of Blackwater.

Count on it. You read it here first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reality based Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. The last time the US faced significant problems with privatized military forces was when
Aaron Burr murkily schemed to seize Mexico and the (then) western US with a private army in the early 1800s. That led to a series of private filibustering expeditions into Texas (where else?) and northern Mexico by frontier riff-raff and and disaffected Mexican revolutionaries. The early Republic of Texas governments were continually plagued by their adventurism. Texas President Sam Houston once proclaimed that they should "plant corn" rather than pursue their many crackpot schemes which threatened to involve a perpetual war with Mexico and discourage recognition of the legitimacy of the Texas Republic. I regard Bush/Cheney as their spiritual heirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
29. Good point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiregrass Willie Donating Member (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. Scattered to the four winds -- I hope.
Then maybe Prince can sell Amway for a living instead of hustling taxpayers.

Prince is the brother of Betsy DeVos, a former chairman of the Republican Party of Michigan and wife of former Alticor (Amway) president and Gubernatorial candidate Dick DeVos. (DeVos is son of Amway founder).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Prince
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
12. Same contract, different war
The Dems in Congress have shown reluctance in reining in the Junta's pet mercs. Why should this change just because the Administration changes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. If they clean out the Pentagon civilian brass from top to bottom..
which I hope they will, it could happen. There's a lot of corruption, and most if not all of the profits are going to Republicans. Realistically, I doubt the Democrats are going to sit by and let that continue on. Perhaps, if you want to be cynical, you can think that the corruption will just shift from one party to the next, but I doubt Blackwater will be privy to it much longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. I hope it happens too, but I'm not holding my breath n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. It will happen .......
As said in the post just above (Virginia Dare) the worst case is that the corruption shifts from one party to the other. I am more hopeful. I think the ideologues at the Pentagon will be ousted/replaced. There is a virtual 100% certainty that the appointees will all be gone. The deeper issue is the military ideologues.

I suspect Blackwater will no longer have free access to the Public Teat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
13. This is why the unsecured voting machines bother me
Certain rogue corporations have every incentive in the world to cough up the $$$$ to keep a Dem from taking it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
14. Nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
15. "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss." In other words, nothing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
16. If there were a god, they would be left there without US troops as backup.
Of course, the executives of the company should also be deployed to the war zone.

But, realism says that not a damn thing will change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
18. Blackwater will still need a conflict to profit from
even if the Dems regain congtrol of the WH and end the war in Iraq.

If not in Iraq, BW will go wherever they can cause trouble, then provide the "solution." Sudan, Darfur, perhaps now Burma.

You can bank on it. Organizations like that simply don't just disband.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. They will continue on to be sure..
but I doubt the gravy train they're on now will last forever, especially once the repubs are (hopefully) summarily dispatched in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
21. They will be working for and with Carlyle, other billionaires, dictators, evil regimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. This is the correct answer IMO...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
23. For those who think they'll continue on ..... status quo ........
..... do you really think the Democrats will leave them alone and continue to pay their fees? <---- Not a rhetorical question.

Really? <---- Not a rhetorical question.

I find that hard to believe.

I can believe the Democrats will leave them unpunished, not by ideological choice, but by pragmatic choice. But failing to punish them is quite different from 'continue to pay them'.

What I can't believe is that the Democrats will continue to fund Blackwater. Right now, Blackwater funds go mostly through State. There's little (palatable) that Congress can do about that. But when State is again controlled by grownups, I suspect that will change. We all know that State has two factions - the career diplomats and the ideologues put in place by The Cabal. (And Blackwater is yet another reason why both Powell and the Rice woman need to brought up on charges of crimes against humanity ... but that's another story.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Congress also appropriates the money for the State Department..
so they could easily axe them from the budget, and I'm quite sure they will at the first opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
24. Their contract will be renewed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
27. they could be used to feed the poor in Africa
put them to good humanitarian use in say the Sudan.

Except you would have to watch them carefully in case they shot someone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
30. new no bid contracts...business as usual...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC