Conservatives indulge in wink-and-nudge dalliances with far-right nativists and outright racists....

[marmar]

.... to court its base. But who's really calling the shots?


from OurFuture.org:


The Right’s Base Behavior
Submitted by David Neiwert on October 1, 2007 - 1:04pm.



So Republican candidates were busy finding better things to do this week than appear at a forum where they could debate minority issues. Rudy's excuse was the best: he had to go off and hobnob with Bo Derek.

Digby's right, as usual: It's not just that the no-show reveals the undercurrent of racism that runs through the conservative movement like an ancient underground sewer -- the snub also played an important role in sending a signal to the conservative base.

We've known for some time that the GOP's fake inclusiveness -- hosting black children onstage at campaign events, trotting out big-name minorities in key public positions -- isn't actual minority outreach. It's part of its strategic appeal to fence-sitting white voters as somehow racially sensitive, while continuing to empower and indulge in wink-and-nudge racial politics that sends coded messages to the more naked racists in their base. It also gives them cover even as they pursue policies that reduce civil-rights enforcement on a broad scale.

A big part of playing that game is to keep the signals going to the base. Sometimes it's plain old race- and gay-baiting, couched in ways that let them erect flimsy facades of deniability. At others, it's making subtle snubs like this week's to make sure no one's deluded into thinking that defending white privilege isn't the first and most important job on the right's agenda.

So in the meantime you get a broad range of right-wingers, from Rush Limbaugh to Glenn Beck to Bill O'Reilly,, and all points in between, finding themselves increasingly comfortable coming out and saying things that no one in their right mind would have found acceptable or reasonable as recent as a decade ago. And the troops are taking note; they're even openly frothing along with their icons at the very thought of an African American running for the presidency.

The big opening for this shift in the dialogue towards near-open acceptance of old-fashioned bigotry is the immigration debate:

Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of all this is the big picture: the anti-immigrant push really represents a significant incursion of right-wing extremism into mainstream conservatism. Each is busy empowering the other, with the end result being an American right pushed even farther to the right.

The nativist right has effectively captured a significant segment of the Republican right, and it's playing out nationally in the immigration debate, most often on the local level. There was, for instance, the immigration forum held in Colorado a couple of weeks ago that was nothing more than an exercise in Latino-bashing:

Tuesday's immigration forum arranged by Weld County District Attorney Ken Buck was orchestrated to play on the worst fears of residents anxious about changes to their community.

... On the one hand, Buck has repeatedly acknowledged publicly that only a small fraction of illegal immigrants commit crimes — beyond their unauthorized entry into this country. On the other, he attempted to whip up a crowd of 600 that gathered at an auditorium Tuesday night by flashing a slide show of photos of Hispanic men and the crimes they've committed. It was accompanied by an "ominous soundtrack," according to a Rocky Mountain News story.

Coupled with a Weld County Sheriff's Color Guard presentation and a recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance, the mood was cast for an us-versus-them event.

... There is no doubt Weld County has undergone significant demographic change over the last decade. The foreign-born population of Greeley went from 7,421 people in 2000 to 11,907 in 2006, a 60 percent increase in a city of 76,000.

When a place begins to undergo that kind of change, there is sure to be anxiety. The newcomers may look different. They may practice a different religion or speak a different language. Historically, this country has suffered waves of tension as groups of immigrants have brought with them their own traditions.

Rather than point out how much different "they" are, as Assistant U.S. Attorney Cliff Stricklin coyly did when he said he was glad to see so many "cowboy hats, boots and American flags" in the largely white audience, it would be far more productive to highlight the things we have in common. We want safe neighborhoods. We want our children to be well-educated. We want friendly communities. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://commonsense.ourfuture.org/right_s_base_behavior?tx=3

[liberaldemocrat7]

1. That's why I call their party the REPUBLIKLAN Party.

That's why I call their party the REPUBLIKLAN Party.

Oh and the major Republiklan candidates did not even show up for the women in their base, skipping the convention of the National FedeRATion of Republiklan women.

[Tommy_Carcetti]

2. It's called "racism laundering"

They pick an argument, such as illegal immigration, where there is at least a legitimate argument as to why people should follow proper procedures and customs when immigrating to the country. Enforcement of codified border and immigration laws is in fact a legitimate argument.

But they'll then use that legitimate argument as a basis to denegrate people on the basis of their nationality or race as an exercise in pure bigotry. They'll talk bad about the language and culture of Mexicans, and demand token measures be taken, like making English the "official" language. They'll accuse them of being violent and involved in criminal activity (as if there are no Americans who are violent and involved in criminal activity). They'll accuse them of being involved in smuggling terrorists over the border. They'll say they are bringing in diseases into the country, like leporsy. In the end, the discussion is no longer about enforcement of immigration laws, but now it's about those dirty, criminal Mexicans who are coming into the country to take your jobs and rape your wives.

Or think terrorism by Islamic radicals. I think we can all say terrorism is a horrible, horrible thing. However, many on the right have taken upon using terrorism as an excuse to denegrate the Muslim religion. They love to quote bits and snippets of the Koran to indicate that it is somehow this ultra-violent movement, or say that there is no relationship between the Muslim Allah and the Christian God (whereas a review would have them being one and the same.) The fact that there are terrorists out there like Bin Laden who also proclaim to be Muslim and doing Allah's work gives some on the right an easy excuse to hate, hate, hate billions of people because they don't share their religion.